Crude Aircraft Carriers and Sea Aerodrome

I dont care if it's a super late game feature that's ungodly expensive to produce. I think we should have mobile aerodromes in the water to create new routes for airplanes. The navy would obviously need to defend these new units as they should be very squishy. I'm even down to restrict them to only fighters. This would allow the player to move fighters around in ways they simply cannot due to their range of motion.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

21 Replies

Slyx

This is my personal opinion and not a statement from Bytro:

Having aircraft carriers in a ww1 game is nonsense.

Slyx, I agree with you COMPLETELY. No way should we have any kind of aircraft carrier in a WW1 game.


NOW, how about my idea that when HT's are heading south on a board they should be able to move faster because they're going downhill? :D:D:D

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch