I try to start a multi alliance battle. The idea is to get 10 allies on the world map for a ultimate team fight!
Idea:
I've split the World in 10 regions, one for each ally. Each ally, send five players for they team.
Regions and available Nations:
1. North America
2. Central America
3. South America
4. Europe
5. North Africa
Brit. Columbia
Colombia
South Argentina
France
Algeria
Alberta
Venezuela
North Argentina
Germany
Mauritania
Saskatchewan
Caribbean
South Brazil
Italy
French Sudan
Northwest USA
South Mexico
São Paulo
Sweden
Upper Volta
North USA
North Mexico
Bolivia
United Kingdom
Libya
Ontario
Texas
Goiás
Spain
Nigeria
Quebec
South USA
East Brazil
Romania
Maranhão
Yugoslavia
6. South Africa
7. Middle East & Orient
8. Russia
9. Asia
10. South East Asia & Oceania
Angola
Iraq
Arkhangelsk
Japan
Borneo
Belgian Congo
Syria
Cent. Russia
Korea
Sumatra
South Africa
Persia
Volga Nzhny
Comm. China
Philippines
South West Africa
Saudi Arabia
Volga Perm
Nat. China
Papua New Guinea
Madagascar
Pakistan
North Ural
Manchukuo
Indochina
Benchuanaland
Turkestan
Siberia
East Yakutia
Burma
Tanganyika
North India
Khabarovsk
New Zealand
New South Wales
Queensland
Western Australia
Time-line:
If one ally will playing with us the leader or a mod must leave a reply here in this thread. (from now!)
The regions will be scattered randomly. (one week before start)¹
The five players of each team choose they starting nation in they region (last days)
Closing date is Monday 04/11/2016 -18:00 C.E.T. I - At this time the polls are closed and I post the final rules!)
The game will starts on 04/15/2016 - 08:00 C.E.T.
Rules:
The use of GOLD is forbidden
The use of rockets is forbidden (Update! - see voting! - click)
If a team is already attacked by two other teams, it will be forbidden to attack this team. (no body-stripping) (Update! - see voting! - click)
Players must enter the game during the fist 48 hours, after these time his team must play with less players
No cooperation between the teams! (no shared map; no right of way; no exchange of resources)
Game language is English
Respect you opponent, it's a game and we are all gentleman!
Note:
¹) Randomized Choice: The signed allies will give tip for the last both dots from the exchange course between us dollar and euro at the noon of the next day. (Central European Time)
Team A says the course at next day is xx45
Team B says xx56
Team C says xx85
and so on. The team with the closest tip gets the first chance tho choose they starting region!
Questions?
please ask!
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
270 Replies
20 Mar 2016, 10:06
Hi,
Start date must be at 04/15 because if be until 04/10 in Vacation, without Internet!
to point 1)
OK, i will open a poll about the rockets.
to point 2)
Every ally can be in war with a maximum of to other allies, that was the idea.
first example form you, team D is not allowed to attack A.
second example team A is not the right to attack B,C and D. The last war must be canceled. It's not allowed for team E to attack team A.
to point 3)
Good question! I like to say no, to every kind of cooperation, it's a team fight and only the last team wins. We must believe in honor of the players and our spies!
20 Mar 2016, 10:12
Only the leaders (or only one player) of each team has the right to vote!
20 Mar 2016, 10:28
So, if I understand you well, alliance can be only in two wars, no matter if it attacks or it is attacked... Interesting. So, if I am at war with someone and want to avoid being attacked by another strong neighbour, I will attack some alliance on other side of map so that strong neighbour can't attack me, which can potentially lead to... unusual situations.
Is that right?
20 Mar 2016, 11:18
I think we should define active wars as having either territorial or troop losses or both. Cold Wars and trade wars don't count? So a war has to follow the spirit of the war, meaning death, destruction and conquest.
Was there a peace period between players and/or AIs?
Are NAPs counted as cooperation?
Kalantigos
Master Chief Petty Officer.
Game Moderator
EN Community Support
Bytro Labs | Call of War
20 Mar 2016, 11:22
What if i send 1-2 troops in random location to atk far away enemy alliance while i am already waring 1 other alliance. That means no other alliances cant atk myn alliance? Because it is an active war.
20 Mar 2016, 11:28
sadapta wrote:
What if i send 1-2 troops in random location to atk far away enemy alliance while i am already waring 1 other alliance. That means no other alliances cant atk myn alliance?
Not really big enough to be a war, so my personal opinion is this wouldn't protect you.
Kalantigos
Master Chief Petty Officer.
Game Moderator
EN Community Support
Bytro Labs | Call of War
20 Mar 2016, 11:39
yeah, that's right. I it's right that we have a problem in this way.
To prevent a misuse I think we have to say that not the declaration war is deciding. The act of war in the news, between two units will be decisive.
Simultaneously wars against AI are allowed.
Good?
20 Mar 2016, 11:54 (edited)
But it be act of war in news? Plus how you know how active the war is realy?
20 Mar 2016, 11:56
5 people are far more than enough to win world map, if 5 and 5 ally and cooperate, shame on them, if you are that coward and bad, better dont play this map and i will satanize you in newspapers and where ever i can!!
maximum 2 enemies is very bad idea. Its not just about abuse, its about killing sense of game. I'll make you example of us, south africa.. If North Africa starts war with Europe and Middle East,which is posible, it meants we from south cant attack anything on our continent.
If Asia starts war with Russia and Middle East, it means Australia cant attack Eastern Asia ? not good
20 Mar 2016, 13:18
im all for declaring war in the news paper, having different levels of cooperation between alliances. Makes things fun and interesting
Forum Gang Divine Entity
Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.
20 Mar 2016, 13:27
Ellio_98 wrote:
im all for declaring war in the news paper, having different levels of cooperation between alliances. Makes things fun and interesting
let's go all vs ellio's alliance, to be fun and interesting
20 Mar 2016, 13:34
nemuritor98_ wrote:
Ellio_98 wrote:
im all for declaring war in the news paper, having different levels of cooperation between alliances. Makes things fun and interesting
let's go all vs ellio's alliance, to be fun and interesting
But with you on the other team we'll still beat you.
The past is a foreign country.
20 Mar 2016, 13:51
Pablo22510 wrote:
nemuritor98_ wrote:
Ellio_98 wrote:
im all for declaring war in the news paper, having different levels of cooperation between alliances. Makes things fun and interesting
let's go all vs ellio's alliance, to be fun and interesting
But with you on the other team we'll still beat you.
Keep dreaming
20 Mar 2016, 14:03
If we want to limit the number of teams that fight against a other team or not?
Every team has one vote!
20 Mar 2016, 14:37
nemuritor98_ wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
nemuritor98_ wrote:
Ellio_98 wrote:
im all for declaring war in the news paper, having different levels of cooperation between alliances. Makes things fun and interesting
let's go all vs ellio's alliance, to be fun and interesting
But with you on the other team we'll still beat you.
Keep dreaming
Mate, you better get two empty buckets, because when I invade you, you'll need them for all of the tears that are going to drop from your eyes.
The past is a foreign country.
20 Mar 2016, 14:39
Pablo22510 wrote:
nemuritor98_ wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
nemuritor98_ wrote:
Ellio_98 wrote:
im all for declaring war in the news paper, having different levels of cooperation between alliances. Makes things fun and interesting
let's go all vs ellio's alliance, to be fun and interesting
But with you on the other team we'll still beat you.
Keep dreaming
Mate, you better get two empty buckets, because when I invade you, you'll need them for all of the tears that are going to drop from your eyes.
Plus how you know how active the war is realy?
