lol that's true. Well, with that said, where were we?
Something about storing weapons within the forum....Is this alliance for users with "Gen." Or "Generals" in their username only?
smh you should use the ban hammer on yourself for thinking about such dangerous things (Really storing weapons in a forum full of war enthusiast).
I would have loved for the alliance to have all names with "Gen." or "General" in their names. But, Call of War makes it quite difficult to change names (I don't even know how to do it myself ). That and the fact that not all members will be staying in the game for long.
I might make it a sort of milestone reward (e.g. whoever stays for one month in the alliance gets the title of "Gen.")
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - George S. Patton
"In a man to man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine" - Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel
15 Jan 2016, 04:59
kitanga_nday wrote:
smh you should use the ban hammer on yourself for thinking about such dangerous things (Really storing weapons in a forum full of war enthusiast).
I would have loved for the alliance to have all names with "Gen." or "General" in their names. But, Call of War makes it quite difficult to change names (I don't even know how to do it myself ). That and the fact that not all members will be staying in the game for long.
I might make it a sort of milestone reward (e.g. whoever stays for one month in the alliance gets the title of "Gen.")
I have yet to see you in chat mate haha. Dont be afraid...
It would be cool to have titles to give to folks as leader. I can already think of a couple hehe. Your alliance requirements seem pretty laid back id say.
smh you should use the ban hammer on yourself for thinking about such dangerous things (Really storing weapons in a forum full of war enthusiast).
I would have loved for the alliance to have all names with "Gen." or "General" in their names. But, Call of War makes it quite difficult to change names (I don't even know how to do it myself ). That and the fact that not all members will be staying in the game for long.
I might make it a sort of milestone reward (e.g. whoever stays for one month in the alliance gets the title of "Gen.")
I have yet to see you in chat mate haha. Dont be afraid... It would be cool to have titles to give to folks as leader. I can already think of a couple hehe. Your alliance requirements seem pretty laid back id say.
I have so many games to control that I forget about chat.
I'd like to hear your opinion on the names. Will they be like for rank or will it just like a milestone. (btw how does one change the name of another player).
What do you mean by my Alliance requirements are laid back. Am I missing something?
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - George S. Patton
"In a man to man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine" - Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel
15 Jan 2016, 20:20
kitanga_nday wrote:
I have so many games to control that I forget about chat.
I'd like to hear your opinion on the names. Will they be like for rank or will it just like a milestone. (btw how does one change the name of another player).
What do you mean by my Alliance requirements are laid back. Am I missing something?
Only the folks at the top can change names. And what I meant by your alliance requirements is that it makes it easy for generals to join. Some alliances are RP for example or may require a certain lvl etc..
I have so many games to control that I forget about chat.
I'd like to hear your opinion on the names. Will they be like for rank or will it just like a milestone. (btw how does one change the name of another player).
What do you mean by my Alliance requirements are laid back. Am I missing something?
Only the folks at the top can change names. And what I meant by your alliance requirements is that it makes it easy for generals to join. Some alliances are RP for example or may require a certain lvl etc..
I see. And frankly I think I best place in a sort of min. level range too. Especially now. A new guy asked if he could still join the alliance later when it is bigger. I wasted no time and kicked him.
I forgot to put loyalty in the rules (it's now been corrected).
So what's the best min. level range?
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - George S. Patton
"In a man to man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine" - Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel
17 Jan 2016, 22:53
Usually I go with the folks who want to join because they like the alliance or are friends with me or a member. Its up to you if you want a lvl requirement or not.
Usually I go with the folks who want to join because they like the alliance or are friends with me or a member. Its up to you if you want a lvl requirement or not.
I see. And if you had to choose a minimum what would it probably be.
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - George S. Patton
"In a man to man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine" - Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel
). That and the fact that not all members will be staying in the game for long.
