Odd gold pay out

22 Jan 2022, 18:32

I seldom pay much attention to the gold pay-outs. So maybe this is how it always was. It does not seem logic though.

A long game just ended with my coalition winning. To my surprise, I see the newspaper mention the pay out in this way:

These players got the following pay outs:

(Italy) : 2200,- gold COALITION 1, 1500 points, 1st place of nations.

(USA) : 1720,- gold COALITION 2

(Canada) : 1170,- gold COALITION 2

(Manchukuo) : 960,- gold COALITION 2

(Xinjiang) : 2260,- gold NO COALITION, 560 points, 3rd place of nations.

(Australia) : 2200,- gold COALITION 1

(Sweden) : 2200,- gold COALITION 1

Coalition 1 won. But why does Xinjiang get more gold than the winning coalition players? And why do the players in coalition 2 get different pay outs when coalition 1 players get the same?

I don't care if Xinjiang gets 60 extra gold I just wonder if this isnt wrong?

4 Replies

26 Jan 2022, 16:14 (edited)

It's gold for won map + gold for points, while xin got gold for points only. He was close to winning solo I guess

@edit:

or not. This is strange honestly

28 Jan 2022, 22:18

Oh, I didn't realise points counted too. I thought position was all. Well, that may explain it. But still odd that the player with the most provinces ends up getting less rewards than someone with much less provinces IMO.

29 Jan 2022, 03:10

Be like me. If you don't use gold, you won't care about it. Simple.

Kind regards,
Donk
Bytro game addict and avid CoW player.
"Þ" > "th"
Слава
Україні!

4 Replies

Post a Reply