Racist comments directed to me

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

See the OP and the first few posts after that

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

But where is the connection to biological race?

Macedonia97 wrote:

On the topic of racism, I have repeatedly been called a "monkey" by a Serbian nationalist.

Oh damnnn…yeahhh…something is going down…

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

But where is the connection to biological race?

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

russ_russ1 wrote:

I need sum’ background on this thread tho. What’s going on

@AnonymeggABC1234 accused @vonlettowvorbeck of racism.

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

But where is the connection to biological race?

What? When did we mention biological race?

But you are right; let's not forget the other races, like Formula 1 or the 24hrs of Le Mans!

Okayyyy?

Romania as a country is a joke. Complete JOKE. The rest of Europe should be ashamed that Romania is on their continent.

Actually, it feels weird to even refer to Romania as a “country”. Because it is not an actual union, it is, in fact, a gathering of primitive gypsy-nomads and other tribal beings. No wonder why everyone is upset about Romania being in the EU.

But how does Romania function as a “country”, anyway? How does it stick together? These gypsies seem to have just enough mental capacity to refer to themselves as one “people”, for the sole purpose of ensuring their nation’s survival, when all they actually want to do is move abroad and steal the wealth from the host nations, because that is all Romanians know how to do.

If I were in charge, I would ensure that Romania is under complete and permanent NATO/EU occupation.

Europe most protect itself from Romania and from the invasion of Romanian gypsy-nomads. Therefore, all arms sales to Romania must be stopped IMMEDIATELY. There is an underground gypsy-led organization that seeks to overthrow powerful Western governments and create total anarchy and chaos; the Romanians would be able to steal all the wealth and all of the Western civilized world would collapse.

I look at it this way: Europe is represented by a farm. The crops represent the wealth of the Western world. The farmers represent the international Western organizations, for example NATO/EU. The farmers must be equipped with adequate tools (i.e. military) like pitchforks, shovels and scarecrows to defend their farm and their crops from aphids, worms, vermin and crows, which represent Romanians and other nomadic peoples of the world.

The Western world must ensure that they protect their countries from the Romanian invasion. This can only be achieved by dismantling the government of Romania and subjecting the gypsy-nomads to rigorous re-education and assimilation programs.

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

Phillip Bosley wrote:

russ_russ1 wrote:

I wanna be racist to racists. I think that’s totally fair and agreeable

No.

Can you like actually stop being mean?

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

russ_russ1 wrote:

I need sum’ background on this thread tho. What’s going on

@AnonymeggABC1234 accused @vonlettowvorbeck of racism.

Correction: @AnonymeggABC1234 accused vonlettowvorbeck unjustly of racism. Anony pulled the race card in a dishonorable attempt to save himself by deflection, notably after he made a fool of himself.

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

But where is the connection to biological race?

What? When did we mention biological race?

@Anonymegg brought it up.

But you are right; let's not forget the other races, like Formula 1 or the 24hrs of Le Mans!

For example, hypothetically 25% of the world's female population becomes trans. They would identify with the male community despite being a biological female. Thus, s*xual identification is different from biological s*x.

russ_russ1 wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

See the OP and the first few posts after that

Okey dokey

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

Biological race is different from culture. It's an example of "nature vs. nurture"

For example, hypothetically 25% of the world's female population becomes trans. They would identify with the male community despite being a biological female. Thus, s*xual identification is different from biological s*x.

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

But where is the connection to biological race?

What? When did we mention biological race?

@Anonymegg brought it up.But you are right; let's not forget the other races, like Formula 1 or the 24hrs of Le Mans!

Biological race is different from culture. It's an example of "nature vs. nurture"

For example, hypothetically 25% of the world's female population becomes trans. They would identify with the male community despite being a biological female. Thus, s*xual identification is different from biological s*x.

Biological race refers to the concept of categorizing human populations based on distinct physical characteristics and genetic traits. This classification often hinges on observable features such as skin color, hair texture, and facial structure, which have historically been used to delineate groups of people. The notion of biological race has been a subject of extensive debate within the fields of anthropology, genetics, and sociology, as it raises questions about the validity and implications of such classifications in understanding human diversity.

The scientific community increasingly recognizes that the concept of biological race lacks a solid foundation in genetics. Research has shown that the genetic variation within so-called racial groups is often greater than the variation between them. This finding challenges the traditional view of race as a biological determinant and suggests that the differences among human populations are more accurately attributed to environmental factors, cultural practices, and social constructs rather than inherent biological distinctions. Consequently, the emphasis on biological race can perpetuate stereotypes and social inequalities.

In contemporary discourse, the focus has shifted towards understanding human diversity through the lens of population genetics and evolutionary biology. This approach emphasizes the interconnectedness of all human beings and the shared ancestry that underlies our species. By moving away from the outdated concept of biological race, researchers and scholars advocate for a more nuanced understanding of human variation that acknowledges the complex interplay of genetics, environment, and culture, ultimately fostering a more inclusive perspective on human identity.

HenrikSchreiber wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

Biological race is different from culture. It's an example of "nature vs. nurture"

For example, hypothetically 25% of the world's female population becomes trans. They would identify with the male community despite being a biological female. Thus, s*xual identification is different from biological s*x.

THAT'S BULLSHIT!!!

Because it makes sense like...not.

General Sherman wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

But where is the connection to biological race?

What? When did we mention biological race?

@Anonymegg brought it up.But you are right; let's not forget the other races, like Formula 1 or the 24hrs of Le Mans!

Biological race is different from culture. It's an example of "nature vs. nurture"For example, hypothetically 25% of the world's female population becomes trans. They would identify with the male community despite being a biological female. Thus, s*xual identification is different from biological s*x.

This is what chatgpt says about biological race:

Biological race refers to the concept of categorizing human populations based on distinct physical characteristics and genetic traits. This classification often hinges on observable features such as skin color, hair texture, and facial structure, which have historically been used to delineate groups of people. The notion of biological race has been a subject of extensive debate within the fields of anthropology, genetics, and sociology, as it raises questions about the validity and implications of such classifications in understanding human diversity.

The scientific community increasingly recognizes that the concept of biological race lacks a solid foundation in genetics. Research has shown that the genetic variation within so-called racial groups is often greater than the variation between them. This finding challenges the traditional view of race as a biological determinant and suggests that the differences among human populations are more accurately attributed to environmental factors, cultural practices, and social constructs rather than inherent biological distinctions. Consequently, the emphasis on biological race can perpetuate stereotypes and social inequalities.

In contemporary discourse, the focus has shifted towards understanding human diversity through the lens of population genetics and evolutionary biology. This approach emphasizes the interconnectedness of all human beings and the shared ancestry that underlies our species. By moving away from the outdated concept of biological race, researchers and scholars advocate for a more nuanced understanding of human variation that acknowledges the complex interplay of genetics, environment, and culture, ultimately fostering a more inclusive perspective on human identity.

There's also someone talking shit about Romanians.

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

General Sherman wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

CrnaGora2006 wrote:

So is institutionalized race different from biological race?

Isn't that a bit crazy? (pun intended...)

Damn it! Stop promoting faggоt ideals and the gay agenda!!!