Tactic bombers attacking infantry as armored

GameID=1450837

I am bombarding one infantry with 5 tactic bombers, I calculated that with only one attack is enough for kill the infantry but my bombers are proceding as if the enemy is an armored unit instead of an infantry:

5 tactic bombers lv 1 do 15 of damage to infantry.

Infantry lv 1 has 15 of hp.

100% moral.

I have made several attacks and it's bombarding the enemy units yet.

Gyazo: https://gyazo.com/d325e39ef319771438921c2922b1a269

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

19 Replies

Hello.

This is not a bug, the combat depends on several factors.


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

What factors? The city has not a fortifications and I calculated the moral factor.

gacob wrote:

What factors?
Morale of the units, the unit level. Land of the city where it is fighting...

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Please, read again my post. I told everything.

The X-Factor

More information in the link.


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Maximilien wrote:

The X-Factor

More information in the link.

I don't think it. My tactic bombers was hiting the same hp than to an armored unit in each attack.

EDIT:

A proof: in the gyazo the infantry had 33%(4.95 hp) and only one attack more kill them(5 tactic bombers with approximately 92% of hp).

If you think this is one bug, send one bug report with captures and details.


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Already I did but I reported it in this section too.

gacob wrote:

Already I did but I reported it in this section too.
You will have to wait for the response from the English team.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

There is something fishy going on actually. Not even just bombers. I just attacked a level 1 infantry with 1 light tank and 2 armored cars in the plains. My light tank was at 100%. After the first round of battle, it is now at 70%. I also noticed something fishy in a previous attack with 10 infantry 2 at 2 aa. They all hit and did only 6 points of damages to an infantry in the plains. Yet first round I lost 1 infantry and before the single enemy infantry died, lost another.

There is something strange going on. Maybe a randomiser? Something.

Redd Baron wrote:

There is something fishy going on actually. Not even just bombers. I just attacked a level 1 infantry with 1 light tank and 2 armored cars in the plains. My light tank was at 100%. After the first round of battle, it is now at 70%. I also noticed something fishy in a previous attack with 10 infantry 2 at 2 aa. They all hit and did only 6 points of damages to an infantry in the plains. Yet first round I lost 1 infantry and before the single enemy infantry died, lost another.

There is something strange going on. Maybe a randomiser? Something.

The X-Factor <–– Click there.

purplepizza117 wrote:

Redd Baron wrote:

There is something fishy going on actually. Not even just bombers. I just attacked a level 1 infantry with 1 light tank and 2 armored cars in the plains. My light tank was at 100%. After the first round of battle, it is now at 70%. I also noticed something fishy in a previous attack with 10 infantry 2 at 2 aa. They all hit and did only 6 points of damages to an infantry in the plains. Yet first round I lost 1 infantry and before the single enemy infantry died, lost another.

There is something strange going on. Maybe a randomiser? Something.

The X-Factor <–– Click there.
Mighty big X factor.

Redd Baron wrote:

purplepizza117 wrote:

Redd Baron wrote:

There is something fishy going on actually. Not even just bombers. I just attacked a level 1 infantry with 1 light tank and 2 armored cars in the plains. My light tank was at 100%. After the first round of battle, it is now at 70%. I also noticed something fishy in a previous attack with 10 infantry 2 at 2 aa. They all hit and did only 6 points of damages to an infantry in the plains. Yet first round I lost 1 infantry and before the single enemy infantry died, lost another.

There is something strange going on. Maybe a randomiser? Something.

The X-Factor <–– Click there.
Mighty big X factor.
It is significant, if that's what you mean.

When an infantry can defend against armor in the plains and do 6 points of damages to a light tank, and the infantry's defense against armor is 1.5....I calculate the X factor of at least 4X. Significant is an understatement.

Redd Baron wrote:

When an infantry can defend against armor in the plains and do 6 points of damages to a light tank, and the infantry's defense against armor is 1.5....I calculate the X factor of at least 4X. Significant is an understatement.
What is the statement then?

Your statement? You stated this is no bug just an X factor. My statement is that while maybe not a bug? Who knows? But the combat is certainly running different...A LOT different than it did even a short while ago. Just happened again in fact. I hit a single solitary infantry with 7 infantry, and in one swing it killed an infantry. This time unlike the last, at least I killed the infantry back. But the X Factor variations as you call them are really out there beyond reasonable expectations having played the game for a long time.

Hello @Redd Baron

I recommend you to read this: The X-Factor


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

I'm really tired about this bug.

When the Developers will look than this is not normal? 15 tactics bombers lv 2 can't kill 3 enemy militia lv 1.

Maximilien wrote:

Hello @Redd Baron

I recommend you to read this: The X-Factor

Hello Maximilien,

Yes I read about the X factor, but I believe there may be something wrong with it. Been closely following my battles........some ridiculous results are happening on too consistent a basis. Sitting here for example watching a battle play out. So far my planes have done 1/2 damages, 0 damages, 0 damages, 0 damages, and the ground battle under my infantry did 1/2 damages, and took 4X damages. An extreme result from time to time is one thing, but this is somewhat ridiculous and for certain one sided.

I actually like the concept of an X factor. But the incorporation of it at least in my game has been less than good for sure.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Bug Reports and Issues
Quick Launch