PL rule changes poll

Oh I see...

but relax, it is all (just) a game, although a good one ...

MarkAchkar wrote:

Roko u said earlier july with no points, we need reply on this pls, playing without points is useless! Points should always be rewarded

@Xarus where do I signed up for the German league?

follow the link in my signature.

Ok so I guess there is no July game. To bad I was looking forward to it. Generally the Players League did not make changes without some discussion and voting so I am assuming the Players League has dissolved and we are now playing in Roko's league which is ok by me but let's not call it the player's League.

i seem to have missed this post and am unable to vote now

i want to express myu opinion here

while i dont agree with the way the options are worded i would have selected #2

i also agree that roko has done a great job of maintaining the PL and certainly doesnt deserve all the abuse that he has recieved from many

i will continue to support him and the PL

I really cant understand why we need half round. We played 5/6 game in 22p map.

Now you want half point for 22p map, so its mean this will be a 1/4 game. Because 50 P map 4x points you can earn... Its a joke...

In the other hand pls half point for august, lots of people go holiday.

Pls half point to September, school is start.

Pls half point to december, because Christmas And winter holiday....

Other ideas Maybe work. Maybe... turtle tactic will forbidden... everybody need for rush, because need first capture, first in newspaper rank etc...

Half pt , full pt i dont care anymore i will kill u all

I agree that the logic of giving a half point for July is questionable. It sounds like there are about enough to fill up a 22p map so what is the argument? If someone happens to be on holiday, the players who work there butts off for a month shouldn't have to suffer for it. It also seems like the bonus stuff is to somehow make up for the half point which seems strange. As far as all these extra bonuses go, PL is time consuming and stressful enough as it is without having a bunch of other things piled on top to worry about.

That being said, I do appreciate Roko stepping up to keep PL going and I do think he should have some leeway in steering the direction of the league, assuming it's reasonable and not for personal reasons.

DxC wrote:

I agree that the logic of giving a half point for July is questionable. It sounds like there are about enough to fill up a 22p map so what is the argument? If someone happens to be on holiday, the players who work there butts off for a month shouldn't have to suffer for it. It also seems like the bonus stuff is to somehow make up for the half point which seems strange. As far as all these extra bonuses go, PL is time consuming and stressful enough as it is without having a bunch of other things piled on top to worry about.

That being said, I do appreciate Roko stepping up to keep PL going and I do think he should have some leeway in steering the direction of the league, assuming it's reasonable and not for personal reasons.

Xarus wrote:

That's the reason we playing in the German League always now the 100 player world map.

Given that most PL players aren't gung ho psycho killers, a larger map might not be a bad idea for all you turtles But maybe we should make a gung ho psycho killer league

MarkAchkar wrote:

Half pt , full pt i dont care anymore i will kill u all

great i agree

Nimbrel wrote:

Xarus wrote:

That's the reason we playing in the German League always now the 100 player world map.

I have mentioned this for over a year. I think all PL games should be on the 100 player map. This stops new players from getting run over within the first week of the game. It does not diminish player skill in any way, but does make it harder for the same folks to team up each round, due to random placement on a large map.

With 25 active players, everyone would have to clear out 3 inactives (plus the usual neutrals) before land ran out and inter-player conflict began. If you wanna clear inactives,just sign up for any random 22p map under "new games", usually everyone except two or three is out after a few days and you can kill inactives all you want.

I think the PL is about fighting real living opponents, and map choice should be about the least amount of inactives possible.

You are right in this question Rocco. But we can earn half point in 22p map Than 50.. And now, your decision , we can earn 1/4 points

Hi again!

I suggest that make maximum coaliction member limit in 22 PPL map to 3.

In my opinion it makes the diplomacy more difficult, cause more local and global war and game will be more amazing.

A good new rule next game would be: when 2 alliances are in war, a 3erd alliance can't attack that 2 alliances that are in war, upto the war finish. So in that way, never 2 alliances are going to fight against one alone alliance, and the game will be more equal.The last to game finished in a very unequal way. Example in august pl, 7 players agains 2. No make sense playing that way. If we have 4 members coalition, is for do equality to the game. but, that doesn't happen in the game, So the 4 membres coalition rule doesn't have sense if then 7 players of 2 alliances are attacking 2 members of one alliance. At the is is like the rules allow 7 coalition members in one side and 2 in other.

Other way to do more equal the pl games: only 2 coalitions allowed: for example, if there are 22 players signed in, only can be 2 coalitions of 12 each. If one coalition have 10 members the other only can join one more, 11, and can't join the 12th member until the other incorporate the 11th member.

If one member of a coalition become inactive, the other coalition have to quit one player, and he can play alone.

And, dice the start of the game, players can choose to play alone all the game, but that players have 15 day of immunity (nobody can attack them) but they can attack the others.