I would like to play in players league April. Got my Butt whooped as a newcomer in March. Need to know I don't suck that bad
21 Mar 2019, 21:18
Pinned
Players League April 2019 Sign UP
Players League April 2019 Sign UP
Greeting Generals,
April will see our latest Player's League match, and your chance to win Gold 
Please post below if you wish to play in the next round and participate in the Player's League for March. Post in-game username if it is different from the forum and state that you have read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler
Please also note that the Points awarded begining Jan 1 2019, have changed from the 2018 rules
Game will start April 1st.
Only sign-ups here please, take discussion and questions to a different thread
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
27 Replies
22 Mar 2019, 10:54
Please sign me in. I read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler.
24 Mar 2019, 17:15
- XXXXXX1234
I agree to the Players League Rules
25 Mar 2019, 08:02
Robert Huszaluk
I have read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler.
25 Mar 2019, 08:09
Roland.sebastian
I have read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler.
25 Mar 2019, 08:43
I agree to the Players League Rules
25 Mar 2019, 09:47
I have read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler.
25 Mar 2019, 16:42 (edited)
I Agree to rules. Spetsnaz_
30 Mar 2019, 12:54
I agree to the rules, including the spoiler.
31 Mar 2019, 05:50
I do solemnly swear to abide by the rules which I have read. The spoiler has a contradiction, rule 3 coalitions disabled nullifies rule 10 b.
31 Mar 2019, 08:22
not quite sure it is a contradiction, but good findpjrobbo wrote:
I do solemnly swear to abide by the rules which I have read. The spoiler has a contradiction, rule 3 coalitions disabled nullifies rule 10 b
you are correct that rule 3 prevents 10 b and that rule 3 will be used
Thank you
31 Mar 2019, 13:15
Its not a contradiction. A contradiction is a valid statement, which can not be valid because of another valid statement. This results in a situations that states both A and B to be valid. While both A and B exclude each other from being valid.
A go to example of a contradiction is "a married bachelor". Hence if it is true that you are married, it can not be true that you are a bachelor. If it is true that you are a bachelor, it can not also be true that you are married. A contradiction in terms arises.
Rule 3 and 10B do not have this trait. Rule 3 not comming into play just means rule 10B is non aplicable. It becomes an empty statement. Without meaning. Both rule 3 and rule 10B are decorations. They point at nothing in this world so their status as rules becomes questionable.
Go Aristotle and Witgenstein
31 Mar 2019, 14:14
ivery well said and it matches closely to what i attempted to say, with one exceptionEdepedable wrote:
Its not a contradiction. A contradiction is a valid statement, which can not be valid because of another valid statement. This results in a situations that states both A and B to be valid. While both A and B exclude each other from being valid.A go to example of a contradiction is "a married bachelor". Hence if it is true that you are married, it can not be true that you are a bachelor. If it is true that you are a bachelor, it can not also be true that you are married. A contradiction in terms arises.
Rule 3 and 10B do not have this trait. Rule 3 not comming into play just means rule 10B is non aplicable. It becomes an empty statement. Without meaning. Both rule 3 and rule 10B are decorations. They point at nothing in this world so their status as rules becomes questionable.
Go Aristotle and Witgenstein
rule 3 is not an empty statement it points to No Coalitions are allowedEdepedable wrote:
Rule 3 not comming into play just means rule 10B is non aplicable. It becomes an empty statement. Without meaning
31 Mar 2019, 17:12
Hah you are right! Only 10B is empty. Rule 3 is actually valid in the current format.grandpooba52 wrote:
rule 3 is not an empty statement it points to No Coalitions are allowed
31 Mar 2019, 20:50 (edited)
i'm interested in joining the April game.
I have read and agree with the rules.
Androv0210
1 Apr 2019, 06:30
I think we are splitting hairs on the meaning of contradiction but I'm sure you guys got my point.grandpooba52 wrote:
ivery well said and it matches closely to what i attempted to say, with one exceptionEdepedable wrote:
Its not a contradiction. A contradiction is a valid statement, which can not be valid because of another valid statement. This results in a situations that states both A and B to be valid. While both A and B exclude each other from being valid.A go to example of a contradiction is "a married bachelor". Hence if it is true that you are married, it can not be true that you are a bachelor. If it is true that you are a bachelor, it can not also be true that you are married. A contradiction in terms arises.
Rule 3 and 10B do not have this trait. Rule 3 not comming into play just means rule 10B is non aplicable. It becomes an empty statement. Without meaning. Both rule 3 and rule 10B are decorations. They point at nothing in this world so their status as rules becomes questionable.
Go Aristotle and Witgenstein
rule 3 is not an empty statement it points to No Coalitions are allowedEdepedable wrote:
Rule 3 not comming into play just means rule 10B is non aplicable. It becomes an empty statement. Without meaning
Rule 3 nullifies 10B
24 Apr 2019, 22:01
I have read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler.
25 Apr 2019, 05:57
Please sign up on the May sign upPokerface735 wrote:
I have read and agree to the Players League Rules effective January 1, 2019 including the spoiler.
24 Mar 2020, 03:34
Razz123
26 Mar 2020, 21:01
about 10 months too late, rzz
community events are no more
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
