Hello all,
As the first season draws to a close, it is time to ask the players for their input for season 2. What was good (please say so, everyone likes praise
), what was bad, what do you feel that needs to be changed...or stay?
Talk about anything really, be it rockets be allowed, the coalition system, the NAPs, the maps, the point system, anything.
We will gather all the comments and they will help us decide on the course for season 2. The discussion is open as far I am personally concerned, so no polls or anything, just add your constructive criticism (as in: dont just dump a oneliner here, argue your case, or rebut/support another players case).
Let the discussion begin!
Please log in to post a reply.
You all will undoubtedly prevail with your greater wisdom regarding how to perfect this game.
I will happily read the rules when they are published and then decide if I want to participate or just wait for the wailing and gnashing of teeth on the forum.
I have not played in the PL, but I would like to. I also will state that I like F. Marion's idea.
The whole point of a coalition is to better me and my country. To keep me alive and growing, and to give me an opportunity to win. That is the same reason another joins with me. Because he/she feels the coalition will better them, or put them in a better position to stay alive or win the game.
Coalitions come and go. Allies grow... and war... and change.
Good idea F. Marion
historically there is precedent for point sharing. Did not France administer a part of Germany after WWII, equally with US and UK, though maybe USSR was the coalition jumper when considering the cold war that followed.
Food for thought.
Are we going to start Feb. list soon?
Please log in to post a reply.
