Players League 3

I dont?

dasrafa wrote:

I dont?

The players league on historical map is not good. The differences between the nations is to big that is gives us fun for all. This is a international league and if we make the start time in the afternoon of central Europe is after midnight in Bombay.

The historical map is only playable with fix alliances or for good players to try out if they are winning when the take Yugoslavia and fight against the rest of the world.

@miech: Please, you as the chief of the league open a new thread only for the rules. In this thread you declares the rules and if some one not pleased with this rule he must make they own league!

We never will find laws for a league who is every body is happy with.

If we had make one ore two games with this regimentations we can start to talk about some changes.

miech wrote:

Please post your opinion about them (optionally of course ) if you want to join this game.

1: Alliances must always be published in the newspaper

2: A maximum of 2 allies per player, other players can only be NAP partners.

3: NAPs have a maximum length of 7 game days. They may be extended

4: NAPs will include the automatic promise, that you will not allow others to (ab)use this agreement to attack the NAP partner from your lands. Say France NAPs Spain, but allows ally Germany to attack Spain through French lands.

Some other ideas for the next game I personally have:

5: A game on the historical map with country selection. Players choose the country that they feel is best suited to their abilities. First come first go.

6: A game where rockets and nukes are forbidden (rocket fighters are fine if you want to research them).

Count me in, btw!

May i join too?

Yes, we need some cannon fodder.

Funy guy... I like it

Added players.

I will make a general outline regarding the (basic) rules of the PL that is the core of what the PL is about. Because personally I like to have some game-by-game house rules on occasion to keep things fresh and varied, those will be posted seperately per PL game if applicable. This will always be in a democratic 'referendum' kind of way, like in this thread.

Ok, we have 11 players now, so 10p map is not possible anymore. Since more people continue to apply, I will keep things open for a while.

The world map sounds like an excellent idea - the only thing I fear is that its 40+ nations and with 15 or so people playing...I dont think thats a good idea (yet). Of course, I can make a seperate world PL game as nr 4 and see how things go. For this one, it will be 22p map (unless we get 20 more signups in a week )

I think that's a great idea. We could have some monstrous empires.

Sign me up - learnt a lot from PL2 - lol

I have to say I quite like the idea of published alliances and NAP's - after all historically these were a known quantity and it was to the advantage of the allies/NAP participants for other nations to clearly recognize their existence. In game terms, for example, if I had known (as Poland) that Germany and Communist Russia were allies if would have made me much quieter and have searched more diligently for allies to counteract that alliance - it would IMHO add a more interesting flavour to the game

RogodeterSnowl wrote:

I have to say I quite like the idea of published alliances and NAP's

Say Butter, shouldnt you tend to PL game 2? It seems your country suddenly switched color overnight? Bug?

No, school.

Sign me up for the game, I'd like to play.

I like the choosing country idea and publish alliances and NAPs, it would make it fun I think (and the max of 2 allies too)

@miech

You know the game where in? You know how you offered @aquex34 to join? He never goes into the forum, so I think you should pm, if you want.

@ Dasrafa: Choosing army will only be so if the historical map is chosen (players picking to their self judged skill level), the 'regular' map never has chosen countries, because thats unfair to the people that join last.

@ Pablo, I have actually, sent him an ingame message in our current game. He said he was interested, but he has to apply here to formalize things. Not meaning to be a dick, just for oversight and equalness