Hello all,
Though PL 2 is far from finished, I am starting the thread for PL 3. Because I value the input from players to make this...well, a players league, I'd like some opinions about a few ideas that were suggested in the PL 2 game.
Please post your opinion about them (optionally of course
) if you want to join this game.
1: Alliances must always be published in the newspaper
2: A maximum of 2 allies per player, other players can only be NAP partners.
3: NAPs have a maximum length of 7 game days. They may be extended
4: NAPs will include the automatic promise, that you will not allow others to (ab)use this agreement to attack the NAP partner from your lands. Say France NAPs Spain, but allows ally Germany to attack Spain through French lands.
Some other ideas for the next game I personally have:
5: A game on the historical map with country selection. Players choose the country that they feel is best suited to their abilities. First come first go.
6: A game where rockets and nukes are forbidden (rocket fighters are fine if you want to research them).
Majority will decide. If votes are equal, I will be the deciding vote. I will aim for 10 player map, unless interest is so high 22p map is viable.
Participants:
- Miech
- Butter Ball Bill
- Trycster
- CzarHellios
- Outdated
- Xarus
- Galmea
- Nimbrel
- Pablo22510
- Dasrafa
- Desert-foxx
- RogodeterSnowl
- FilipALFA
- BoccaccioP
- Buyaka
- iSpecter
- adrianovicius
- Shodanar
I know, I told him in real lifemiech wrote:
, I have actually, sent him an ingame message in our current game. He said he was interested, but he has to apply here to formalize things. Not meaning to be a dick, just for oversight and equalness
Hello!
I'd like to get beat up on again if there is still room available? 
Miech, could you make the country selection random for more fun ?
Yes, we will do it in this way.
Aha ok, good.Xarus wrote:
Yes, we will do it in this way.
Hello guys.
Some issues here:
Thank you
Well, count me in.
Also, think about displaying final rules somewhere.
Final rules will be posted once I accumilated all the preferences of the players. Standard rules are found in a seperate thread in this subforum. Many have not written their preferences for this PL game yet so far.
Im thinking of getting this one started on Friday, since new signups have been slow last week.
Adding new players.
I think 15 players is quiet enough for a good battle. 
Count me in
Regarding the alliances write in newspaper, I don't think it will be a good idea, because it'll kill the surprise attacks.
Regarding the NAP, I guess in a real war there is no NAP. If I decide to attack my neighbor country why should I wait 7 days?
Let's hope that we'll play with 22 active playersXarus wrote:
I think 15 players is quiet enough for a good battle.
Would be EPIC 
I think that 15 is also enough for now.
You have to consider that some will go inactive. I think we should wait until we get to 22.
I think inactive players must be removed from PL.Pablo22510 wrote:
You have to consider that some will go inactive. I think we should wait until we get to 22.
No! Don't remove players that become inactive.
Sometimes players have problems to become online, because they have technical problems. Last year I missed a partner, he came back after two weeks, the reason was he had an accident an was two week in hospital. 
The player that become inactive once will be recognized by the other league players , if he did't twice, he will not find any partner for the future.
Did fixed the starting date to Friday?
I make some advertisement for the PL and this game 3 in the German forum.
As much as I would love 22 active players, I dont think we can achieve this (yet) with the current speed of signups. Therefore Friday is the chosen day. I think I will start it somewhere around noon GMT+1 so the American timezoners also have a fair chance to jump in soon.Buyaka wrote:
I think inactive players must be removed from PL.Pablo22510 wrote:
You have to consider that some will go inactive. I think we should wait until we get to 22.
So, uh, THIS Friday then?
