ROUND HAS BEGUN, GAME ID 1450610 PASSWORD SENT IN CONVERSATION
Players League
The PL is a series of games which is created by players for players.
The League starts every 1st. of a month a new game on different maps, with the players that have signed for the next game. Nobody needs to play every game. The winners of a match get points for the hall of fame.
Rules
the use of GOLD is forbidden
a maximum of 2 allies per player¹ (SM), other players can only be NAP partners with ROW or lower.
a NAP must have runtime or an exit condition.
the use of rockets is forbidden
the use of nukes is forbidden
after start we have a peace period of 24h² for AI and players, in these time is forbidden to attack enemy
Espionage with economic and with military sabotage is an act of war
It's not allowed to enter a game after day 3
Footer:1 = Build an alliance of three players - like this way: A allied with B & C; B allied with A & C; C is allied with A & B - no D and no E
2 = from the moment of the game is running, see Newspaper
Just a heads up to even the field. My experience with entering one of these games was very negative. I was falsely accused of using gold in the Herald. After I had been defeated for about a 2 weeks I was falsely accused of multiaccounting in the Herald. It was an unpleasant experience for me.
6 Mar 2016, 12:43
DxC wrote:
Just a heads up to even the field. My experience with entering one of these games was very negative. I was falsely accused of using gold in the Herald. After I had been defeated for about a 2 weeks I was falsely accused of multiaccounting in the Herald. It was an unpleasant experience for me.
Hey DxC.
I think you should ignore accusations from players that are as inexperienced as the one who accused you!
And please join us for another round, it is very seldom that we get these accusations.
Also we have discussed, that if anyone thinks someone is cheating he/her must contact Xarus instead of flaming/accusing in the World Herald, since it is very destructive to the game to throw around such accusations.
Add my name to the list please. I am hoping for a 10P map for a change
11 Mar 2016, 04:39
I would like to sign up for the April game ...thanks
11 Mar 2016, 23:15
I would like to join this too please
13 Mar 2016, 03:26
I was able to make it into the March game. Loving it very much. Please add me to the list for April.
14 Mar 2016, 12:37
Sign me up please. I won't let anyone get the jump on me next month!
16 Mar 2016, 07:32
CAn you sign me up for april game plz
16 Mar 2016, 07:38
i would like to sign up for the April game please wildL
16 Mar 2016, 13:26
Please sign me up for the April game
18 Mar 2016, 02:50
Sign me up again - I still have a ways to go, things to do, enemies to beat, humble pie to be consumed
19 Mar 2016, 21:56
Please add me to the April game
19 Mar 2016, 23:16
Sign me up please
21 Mar 2016, 03:26
I liked to join the april game please.
23 Mar 2016, 18:45
Hey I have been working alot and wont be able to be active enough to play the April game so you can take my name off the list so someone else can play...thanks
25 Mar 2016, 00:14
It is unfortunate that this league developed in this way. When I considered joining, it was stated that game will have some rules and that those rules will be bound by players' honour. I see now that many people lack that aspect of personality. Concepts of allies and NAP were introduced in these games. Those are defined by some rules which we agreed to.
I have an alliance in one of the games. There is also another alliance. We agreed to some sort of non-attacking relationship, called NAP. We defined running time and exit condition like the rules demanded. Now, member of other alliance decided that he doesn't like our agreement anymore and says that he never agreed to it. Childish, irresponsible and dishonourable.
It happened in earlier games that people made mistakes, having too much allies or making forbidden units. They fixed them. Now, this guy decides that he will ignore what he agreed to. So, first he ignores concept of alliances by not accepting inter-alliance deals. Second, he ignores concept of NAP by breaking it without meeting exit conditions. While there are prooves that his ally confirmed that this guy accepts the deal and also prooves that he accepted the deal by explaining me some specific situation and telling me that he "will not violate the terms of agreement", he now throws all that away and pretends that map started day ago and there are no deals between us.
My question is next. If alliance and NAP means nothing, why we have rules that define them? Why don't I have shared map with half of them map since making and breaking alliances doesn't have to follow any rules? Or I could make alliance with some people and after that make with some other people and say that first ones didn't understand my words? If we already have those rules, why are they not followed?
I have played in two games, I am also playing third one right now. Until now nobody break his word or any agreement he made with other people. I thought it was because of the rules we had. But now I think it was because people who played in previous games respected their allies and enemies too and acted maturely. It is hard to expect those things from people who can say one thing today and other thing tomorrow.
I enjoyed playing with people like Xarus, wildL, RogodeterSnowl (great opponents every time) and many other people who keep this league alive, but people with no respect to the game or other players will not contribute to this league.
🔒This thread is locked. No new replies can be posted.