Being limited to Naval Bombers and Interceptors on Aircraft Carriers is restricting to the game and does not correctly represent real-life. For example the Doolittle Raid is a great example of Tactical Bombers on early aircraft carriers, and nowadays large planes and bombers always land on aircraft carriers. This addition will be very beneficial as ground attacks from carriers are more feasible, and players are not limited to only effectively attacking ships, and incoming interceptors. My suggestion is that higher level aircraft carriers (after level 3 or 4), are able to hold tactical bombers.
The snow is speaking Finnish. The trees are speaking Vietnamese. Dog Bombs. Manned kamikaze rockets. Giant railroad guns. War is weird.
9 Replies
4 Jun 2019, 18:54
..applies to any aircraft carrier level
Browser games are an ingenious business idea to lure out money .. ..... >> more or less cleverly camouflaged as a real game << .... .. so beware of caltrops, spring-guns and booby traps. Warning! Texts above this signature may contain traces of irony! :D
4 Jun 2019, 22:56
As Restrisiko points out, simply research your tactical bombers to level 4 and they will have a tailhook added for carrier operations. Early versions are not suitable for the short runway landings and takeoffs.
War is a game that is played with a smile. If you can't smile, grin. If you can't grin keep out of the way til you can. - Winston Churchill VorlonFCW Retired from Bytro staff as of November 30, 2020. >>> Click Here to submit a bug report or support ticket <<<
26 Feb 2020, 19:29
Itz_Daniel_Yo_Boi wrote:
Being limited to Naval Bombers and Interceptors on Aircraft Carriers is restricting to the game and does not correctly represent real-life. For example the Doolittle Raid is a great example of Tactical Bombers on early aircraft carriers, and nowadays large planes and bombers always land on aircraft carriers. This addition will be very beneficial as ground attacks from carriers are more feasible, and players are not limited to only effectively attacking ships, and incoming interceptors. My suggestion is that higher level aircraft carriers (after level 3 or 4), are able to hold tactical bombers.
In reality this is not possible because a fully loaded bomber needs more runway to take off
Doolittle had to lighten up his bombers JUST to take off
27 Feb 2020, 00:12
They probably aren't carrying full load bombs in the sea and it probably isn't needed.
27 Feb 2020, 00:37
I would say no to the bombers, Dolittle had to take all guns and anything else not needed to save weight JUST to take off the flight deck, also they were smaller than later bombers and they each only took 4 --500lb bombs.
Also, what most people did not know, was that while those bombers were sitting on the flight deck, the carriers fighter protection was below deck not protecting it.
they could not launch their fighter patrols to protect the carrier
So , overall, it would be stupid to launch a less than fully armed bomber from a carrier
27 Feb 2020, 09:25
As pointed out above, bombers DO have carrier-basing ability after L4. Are you now arguing that it should be removed?
27 Feb 2020, 14:45
Probably he wants it to be removed but in the WWII does bombers take off from carriers?
27 Feb 2020, 14:49
Ask the citizens of Port Darwin when the Japanese carrier fleet sailed by...
..applies to any aircraft carrier level 
