You wouldnβt have been able to cheat to win in the first place!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Big Daddy Elections
Alright, I admit that this idea is *influenced* by Forums Elections thread.
This is basically an election but a rather cool one. This is the race to become Forums' Big Daddy. Are you interested?
Tell me if you are willing to stand in this election. I will arrange voting
Please log in to post a reply.
You wouldnβt have been able to cheat to win in the first place!
Sickening. Who wants three daddies?
Technically me and Donk are the daddies while Mister is a second in command.
Look. Get your act together. What daddy has a "second in command"? Who is that, the oldest son/daughter or something, or maybe a nanny, an aunt, or a neighbor?
And while two daddies may be fine, there can obviously be only one Big Daddy. Just merging and merging all your candidacies just waters down the Bigness of the Daddy concept.
Vote for one, not for three.
And thus I still object to ballot number three. THEY are 3, or 412, or 142, or whatever fashion statement they want to use to attract voters; it is clear that I am only one.
@Carking the 6thK.Rokossovski wrote:
Look. Get your act together. What daddy has a "second in command"? Who is that, the oldest son/daughter or something, or maybe a nanny, an aunt, or a neighbor?And while two daddies may be fine, there can obviously be only one Big Daddy. Just merging and merging all your candidacies just waters down the Bigness of the Daddy concept.
Vote for one, not for three.
And thus I still object to ballot number three. THEY are 3, or 412, or 142, or whatever fashion statement they want to use to attract voters; it is clear that I am only one.
I'm finding it really hard not to like this other big daddy candidate. I say we invite them to the coalition. We will take ballot number 4312.
I agree with your idea, and I second this plan.Donk2.0 wrote:
@Carking the 6thI'm finding it really hard not to like this other big daddy candidate. I say we invite them to the coalition. We will take ballot number 4312.K.Rokossovski wrote:
Look. Get your act together. What daddy has a "second in command"? Who is that, the oldest son/daughter or something, or maybe a nanny, an aunt, or a neighbor?And while two daddies may be fine, there can obviously be only one Big Daddy. Just merging and merging all your candidacies just waters down the Bigness of the Daddy concept.
Vote for one, not for three.
And thus I still object to ballot number three. THEY are 3, or 412, or 142, or whatever fashion statement they want to use to attract voters; it is clear that I am only one.
I agree, I would like to support you all, but I would say limit coalitions to 2 people.K.Rokossovski wrote:
Sickening. Who wants three daddies?
Then who will we vote for? There will only be one choiceDonk2.0 wrote:
@Carking the 6thI'm finding it really hard not to like this other big daddy candidate. I say we invite them to the coalition. We will take ballot number 4312.K.Rokossovski wrote:
Look. Get your act together. What daddy has a "second in command"? Who is that, the oldest son/daughter or something, or maybe a nanny, an aunt, or a neighbor?And while two daddies may be fine, there can obviously be only one Big Daddy. Just merging and merging all your candidacies just waters down the Bigness of the Daddy concept.
Vote for one, not for three.
And thus I still object to ballot number three. THEY are 3, or 412, or 142, or whatever fashion statement they want to use to attract voters; it is clear that I am only one.
I don't believe in four Big Daddies. Let the opposition have their sacriligious orgies, I will run alone as nr 1.
I will become deputy daddy
You are number 3. Maybe 300.K.Rokossovski wrote:
I don't believe in four Big Daddies. Let the opposition have their sacriligious orgies, I will run alone as nr 1.
CRUCIAL INFORMATION
(This thread contains some vital information you need to know!)
ANNOUNCEMENT OF VOTING DAYS:-
The election will officially start on Friday(3/11) and end on Sunday(5/11). Voting would be open for 72[color=#000000] hours after I make the official thread on Friday announcing Voting. Since there are 3 days there would be no time-zone issues. Once voting starts, contestants are not supposed to boost their propaganda anymore. Also there will be a strict no chit-chat rule enforced during the voting period. Kindly talk about elections on the chit-chat thread from Friday (Voting day)
CHIT-CHAT THREAD LINK: Daddy Electons "Chit-Chat" - General Discussions - Call of War- Forum[/color]
FEW MORE RULES:-
(ii) Member of forums for at least 1 month
(This is done to avoid the "bot" claims of the presidential elections, if need arises so, few exceptions will be their for legit people who do not fill either criteria)
REVISIED CONTESTANT LIST:-
Also shoutout to rokossovski for standing in the election and not killing the spirt of the election.
Agreed. He should conduct it the next time.Claudio NVKP wrote:
Finally! We need Joe to host the next elections!Every single wrong thing has been banned in this election. This way a Hippo/Think can't join. You can't cause drama. You can't just start revolution. I swear if these rules were thare I would've stayed PM.
All forum elections from now on are best led by him.
voting will begin under 1 day, contestants remember to inform your followers to vote for you!
TEAM 4312 FOLLOWERS... UNITE
Gentlemen, I am running for this forum's big daddy.
Reasons why you should vote for me:
>I am a hippo, so I am big.
>People like to call me daddy.
>If you do not vote for me the forum gang will bust your kneecaps.
Reasons not to vote for me:
>If you're dumb.
Joe already said itβs all locked in, too late.GreatbigHippo wrote:
Gentlemen, I am running for this forum's big daddy.Reasons why you should vote for me:
>I am a hippo, so I am big.
>People like to call me daddy.
>If you do not vote for me the forum gang will bust your kneecaps.
Reasons not to vote for me:
>If you're dumb.
MamaCarking the 6th wrote:
Joe
just for this he deserves a spotGreatbigHippo wrote:
MamaCarking the 6th wrote:
Joe
Please log in to post a reply.