Bytro sucks recently

Lmao. I'm speechless. I thought she was mentioning some older thread but literally "Modding" thread, holy smokes. Perhaps, she should check the threads before saying anything.

Brug

Taffeta must combust.

if YOU checked both threads you would see Zhokov is making the same point in both of them, that he wants to be a Mod.

Therefor he could have just made one saying both things.

im on Taffetas side

Claudio NVKP wrote:

That's about allowing level 100 people for moderation, not about BYTRO SUCKING! TAFFETA!

-VIP- wrote:

im on Taffetas side

-VIP- wrote:

if YOU checked both threads you would see Zhokov is making the same point in both of them, that he wants to be a Mod.

Therefor he could have just made one saying both things.

-VIP- wrote:

im on Taffetas side

I would love to join the revolution too

REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!

URRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Carking the 6th wrote:

-VIP- wrote:

if YOU checked both threads you would see Zhokov is making the same point in both of them, that he wants to be a Mod.

Therefor he could have just made one saying both things.

-VIP- wrote:

im on Taffetas side

Just because Claudio is smelly doesn’t mean you have to agree with Taffyta on everything. In this case the threads were made for different reasons. Claudio is still smelly and in the wrong, but it doesn’t change the truth here.

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Please stop supporting that creepy old man that’s been picking fights with me for no reason. OFC i didn’t read the fucking thread, so i just assumed!

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

-VIP- wrote:

if YOU checked both threads you would see Zhokov is making the same point in both of them, that he wants to be a Mod.

Therefor he could have just made one saying both things.

-VIP- wrote:

im on Taffetas side

Just because Claudio is smelly doesn’t mean you have to agree with Taffyta on everything. In this case the threads were made for different reasons. Claudio is still smelly and in the wrong, but it doesn’t change the truth here.

Please stop supporting that creepy old man that’s been picking fights with me for no reason. OFC i didn’t read the fucking thread, so i just assumed!

Claudio NVKP wrote:

allowing level 100 people for moderation

Some of þe best and most respectful/mature CoW players are under lv100, while I've also seen many above þat limit þat are toxic and disgusting. I personally am level 90, so I don't even meet þose requirements. Getting to level 100 is easy if you spam matches. Something else þat indicates player experience and maturity should be used. In my case, I prefer to play very few matches, but þe ones I do, I play well on.

Donk2.0 wrote:

Claudio NVKP wrote:

allowing level 100 people for moderation

ngl, þat's a horrible suggestion.

Some of þe best and most respectful/mature CoW players are under lv100, while I've also seen many above þat limit þat are toxic and disgusting. I personally am level 90, so I don't even meet þose requirements. Getting to level 100 is easy if you spam matches. Something else þat indicates player experience and maturity should be used. In my case, I prefer to play very few matches, but þe ones I do, I play well on.

Donk2.0 wrote:

Claudio NVKP wrote:

allowing level 100 people for moderation

ngl, þat's a horrible suggestion.

Some of þe best and most respectful/mature CoW players are under lv100, while I've also seen many above þat limit þat are toxic and disgusting. I personally am level 90, so I don't even meet þose requirements. Getting to level 100 is easy if you spam matches. Something else þat indicates player experience and maturity should be used. In my case, I prefer to play very few matches, but þe ones I do, I play well on.

TheZhukov wrote:

Donk2.0 wrote:

Claudio NVKP wrote:

allowing level 100 people for moderation

ngl, þat's a horrible suggestion.Some of þe best and most respectful/mature CoW players are under lv100, while I've also seen many above þat limit þat are toxic and disgusting. I personally am level 90, so I don't even meet þose requirements. Getting to level 100 is easy if you spam matches. Something else þat indicates player experience and maturity should be used. In my case, I prefer to play very few matches, but þe ones I do, I play well on.

It was just a placeholder. You know an Idea. Just that modding would be WONDERFUL

WE NEED MODDING!!!!

Uh, I htink you misunderstood, in this thread modding meant creating new scenarios with maps, borders, troops etc....

TheZhukov wrote:

Uh, I htink you misunderstood, in this thread modding meant creating new scenarios with maps, borders, troops etc....

Donk2.0 wrote:

TheZhukov wrote:

Donk2.0 wrote:

Claudio NVKP wrote:

allowing level 100 people for moderation

ngl, þat's a horrible suggestion.Some of þe best and most respectful/mature CoW players are under lv100, while I've also seen many above þat limit þat are toxic and disgusting. I personally am level 90, so I don't even meet þose requirements. Getting to level 100 is easy if you spam matches. Something else þat indicates player experience and maturity should be used. In my case, I prefer to play very few matches, but þe ones I do, I play well on.

It was just a placeholder. You know an Idea. Just that modding would be WONDERFUL

Ah, I see. I þought þat þis was þe entire idea. Some new sort of moderation is needed, for sure, but I don't þink þat giving it to people þat achieve certain game progress benchmarks, without any sort of screening, in þe right choice.

WE NEED MODDING!!!!