Countries should not be allowed attacking anymore if they have no more land!!!

I defeated British Odisha earlier this week and took all of his land, and I also thought I killed all of his troops. Turns out I am wrong as he sent like 30 troops throughout the waters and took Oceana which is my home country. I think that countries should either be punished if they have no more land or they should at least surrender. Idk this might just be me, but it seems like a cuck move to have all of your troops just avoid defending his capital and his land and instead he sent all of his troops to my land.

2 Replies

this is called a stratagem of war, if you didnt want to fall prey to it, u should've defended ur cores

"In my humble opinion, on the subject matter, topic and content discussed beforehand; I would like to humbly propose, convey my idea on the subject and remark; this, with the help of the afforementioned post" - Karl von Krass
"The Golden Spire is looking for members, Anyone with good sense of game mechanics and a discord account can apply"
Secretary of Nova0213

Leaving your cores undefended is begging to be meme'd - you got played by a bait 'n switch. As Karl observed, it's a legitimate, albeit uncommon strategy.

Word of advice: Accept the loss, learn the lesson, and make sure you've got your bases covered in the future, up to and including naval and land defenders in your home territory.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Discussions
Quick Launch