Feedback on coalition member limitation

With the latest update we introduced limits for coalitions. A future update will enable shared victories amongst coalition members.

Here you can vote if you think that the chosen numbers for the limits are reasonable, or if they are too low or too high.

Current member limit is depending on map size: 0-21p = 2 members, 22-31p = 3 members, 32-50p = 4 members, 51-100p = 5 members.

Please specify in your post how you would alter them and why.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

22 Replies

My fault, shouldn't have used the "P" word. There are better threads for that issue to be argues about.

My point, which was clearly made, was that the community does not forget about what they want because a couple months have passed. Six months is a good time to re visit the task of this thread, which is coalition size. Two thirds for players currently think it is good where it is at. In time, this might shift one way or another. Even as small as it is, the poll has already showed that this is exactly what the community wanted. Random rogues complaining will always be happy, as some will simply never be satisfied. The bulk of players on a 2:1 ratio like where it is.

Free Time looks good on me

They are too low and should be for 51- lower player games 1 extra coalition member and for larger than 51+ 2 extra coalition members to be more realistic

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Discussions
Quick Launch