Historical Map is bad

Historical map need more difference than normal maps , firstly they need to change two things

If I would want extreme balance I would play 22p map not historical map

1- Finland is not playable

2- British India , British Egypt ,Oman are not belong to United Kingdom

1- at historical map no heroic defence opportunity against soviet union , but you can play , venezuela , If a player wants to play with normal countries he can go to 22p or 100p maps why they think a player wants to play venezuela at historical map ??

2- about weakness of United Kingdom , they say it is related with balance but If I would go to win easier at map I would choose United States of America or Germany firstly not United Kingdom , If they give india and egypt to United kingdom , map will be more fun and playable , players who choose egypt or india dont play even to map unnecessary inactive players and these countries are not funny at historical map , no role play , noone wants to be inactive governors there , if they give more power to UK , people will start to play actively UK noone care what egypt or india doing at this map

why players should play british egypt or venezuela at historical map ????

as a extra , germany is so strong now you can fight against 5 player at the same time at europe , give more power to UK and war will be more fun at europe , I'm bored to see at day 1 half of france and poland goes to germany , is this real ?

what do you think about historical map ? please share your ideas , thank you