How many people of each nationality on the forum

Can we talk about Ordovician period (in which case I have no ides in depth about them, but it seems like a great topic to start with), please?

It’s not about Einstein, it’s about the bomb. To honest, even if Einstein’s research was required the U.S. still invented and built the nuke, so it wouldn’t really matter anyway.

The egg came first, as whatever species of “Dinosaur” that became chickens laid more and more chicken-like eggs until it finally become the modern chicken.

Carking the 6th wrote:

It’s not about Einstein, it’s about the bomb. To honest, even if Einstein’s research was required the U.S. still invented and built the nuke, so it wouldn’t really matter anyway.

The egg came first, as whatever species of Dinosaur that became chickens laid more and more chicken-like eggs until it finally become the modern chicken.

But there's this one bird that tickles me...

Cassowary... I mean, sure... they come from Dinosaurs..

How about now we changed it into "Who came first? The dinosaurs of the egg"?

The dinosaurs, which laid eggs slowly but surely until they evolved into avians and then Chickens?

Carking the 6th wrote:

The dinosaurs, which laid eggs slowly but surely until they evolved into avians and then Chickens?

From what I know, most life forms started in the water as a very very teeny tiny microscopic creatures...

They soon evolve and evolve... soon developing a more complex body parts.

Back then, there's no plants in the land, so the oxygen are mostly from the planktons.

*Pretend this is an Anomalocaris jumpscare*

(Fun fact: Mammals existed before the Dinosaurs )

Plants developed very later, that's when land creatures started developing.

From the waters, I guess...

cmiiw.

Earlier animals like dimetrodon, etc… if you go back far enough it’ll just be the first bacteria.

After those tiring evolutions of chickens... then we have this delicacy.

Is it worth it for those billions of evolutions? I'd say it is.

I mean don’t they say dinosaurs would taste like chicken? Tasty…

Carking the 6th wrote:

Earlier animals like dimetrodon, etc… if you go back far enough it’ll just be the first bacteria.

Especially back then when the situation of the atmosphere is very very uncertain... where there would a big mass extinction either from meteors, asteroids or whatever those plankton died from creating too much oxygen where one barely turns it into the opposite and slowly causes the atmosphere around them to cooldown and freeze... and eventually back at it again

Chicken came first. I say this as a creationist. Although then there's the whole thing about the development of different varieties of chicken, or of poultry in general, and how much of that happened after creation, and I'm not going into that until I've had time to do more reading up on this.*

Honestly the whole Einstein/bomb debate isn't going anywhere at this point: my skim-read of the argument suggests that the last few posts have mainly been a back-and-forth about whether Carking's sources prove the point he says they prove, whether as sources they are reliable, whether the backing-up with his own opinion was sufficient, and whether noblebright actually read them properly. It looks like an overly elaborate argument of contradictions at this stage, so I suggest you both drop it and accept a stalemate.

*Which will probably be never unless a number of people insist I do go into this in more detail. I'm fine with 'my religious beliefs clash with your scientific understanding'.

Lady Aragosta wrote:

Chicken came first. I say this as a creationist. Although then there's the whole thing about the development of different varieties of chicken, or of poultry in general, and how much of that happened after creation, and I'm not going into that until I've had time to do more reading up on this.*

Honestly the whole Einstein/bomb debate isn't going anywhere at this point: my skim-read of the argument suggests that the last few posts have mainly been a back-and-forth about whether Carking's sources prove the point he says they prove, whether as sources they are reliable, whether the backing-up with his own opinion was sufficient, and whether noblebright actually read them properly. It looks like an overly elaborate argument of contradictions at this stage, so I suggest you both drop it and accept a stalemate.

*Which will probably be never unless a number of people insist I do go into this in more detail. I'm fine with 'my religious beliefs clash with your scientific understanding'.

Ahh, those trilobites.

Our beloved number show of the star in the Cambrian and Ordovician period.

I prefer hunger games style fight to the death

Volcanos in Siberia and Phytoplankton:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Lady Aragosta wrote:

Chicken came first. I say this as a creationist. Although then there's the whole thing about the development of different varieties of chicken, or of poultry in general, and how much of that happened after creation, and I'm not going into that until I've had time to do more reading up on this.*

Honestly the whole Einstein/bomb debate isn't going anywhere at this point: my skim-read of the argument suggests that the last few posts have mainly been a back-and-forth about whether Carking's sources prove the point he says they prove, whether as sources they are reliable, whether the backing-up with his own opinion was sufficient, and whether noblebright actually read them properly. It looks like an overly elaborate argument of contradictions at this stage, so I suggest you both drop it and accept a stalemate.

*Which will probably be never unless a number of people insist I do go into this in more detail. I'm fine with 'my religious beliefs clash with your scientific understanding'.

What if God created Evolution?

True. Our lord and Saviour Comrade Marx-Freezy created the earth and heavens.

Steezus Christ will win the next election in America

Who is 'Steezus'?