5 new nations were added to the 1939-Historic World War map. The nations were, Venezuela, Peru, Netherlands, South Africa and British Egypt. Today I'm going to show you the guide to South Africa. Hope you like it.
South Africa is a small country with a small military. But full of resources. All of the cores produce double resources, but Windhoek produces 1 food. So there is no shortage of resources, South Africa is capable to handle a giant military. So here are the steps.
1) Do NOT invade British or French Africa. Africa is a giant wasteland of nothing and if they bring their navy and army down your dead! (Unless they're inactive though). If you want, you can waste your resources on Portuguese and Belgian Africa, using your already researched Light tanks at armored cars, they're very fast, thus not waste your time in Africa and take it fast, instead of spending militia in the allied doctrine as they're very slow. So you got 4 options:
A) Invade South America through Argentina or Brazil.
B) Invade India, through Karachi, Bombay, Madras, Calcutta.
C) Invade the Dutch East Indies, Easiest option, for beginners as East Indies Indies are least defended at the start.
D) Invade Australia, It isn't impossible but can be done with a big enough navy you can bombard the coast.
E) Invade British Egypt, invade through RoW through UK, or France. Or just Invade by sea.
2) Don't waste money on industry, You don't need better industry as South Africa produces enough resources. Just focus on army.
3) Diplomacy is crucial in every games.
hey we only have 1 option in the poll thats UNDEMOCRATIC!
having a no is unnecessary
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
They didn't like it bcz they're biasefRBoi200 wrote:
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
Proof? Chimere provided relevant proof on why the guide is bad. You have any proof the Chimere is biased?Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like it bcz they're biasefRBoi200 wrote:
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
It proved him wrongRBoi200 wrote:
Proof? Chimere provided relevant proof on why the guide is bad. You have any proof the Chimere is biased?Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like it bcz they're biasefRBoi200 wrote:
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
His evidence proved him wrong?Comrade genz wrote:
It proved him wrongRBoi200 wrote:
Proof? Chimere provided relevant proof on why the guide is bad. You have any proof the Chimere is biased?Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like it bcz they're biasefRBoi200 wrote:
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
I proved him wrong, and he doesn't say this is badRBoi200 wrote:
His evidence proved him wrong?Comrade genz wrote:
It proved him wrongRBoi200 wrote:
Proof? Chimere provided relevant proof on why the guide is bad. You have any proof the Chimere is biased?Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like it bcz they're biasefRBoi200 wrote:
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
...it was the other way around...Comrade genz wrote:
I proved him wrong, and he doesn't say this is badRBoi200 wrote:
His evidence proved him wrong?Comrade genz wrote:
It proved him wrongRBoi200 wrote:
Proof? Chimere provided relevant proof on why the guide is bad. You have any proof the Chimere is biased?Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like it bcz they're biasefRBoi200 wrote:
Why? Oh, I know, the "guide" is bad.Comrade genz wrote:
They didn't like itRBoi200 wrote:
Chimere, whowh, all saw this "guide", why didn't they vote yes?Comrade genz wrote:
No, proves that this got low viewsRBoi200 wrote:
proves the guide is badComrade genz wrote:
so what?RBoi200 wrote:
Only you and Dmitri even voted yes.Comrade genz wrote:
having a no is unnecessary
No it's not, check it. @RBoi200 vote pls.
ill vote if you add noComrade genz wrote:
No it's not, check it. @RBoi200 vote pls.
You proved nothing, and it is bad :
- No industrialization is a disaster for a small countries,
- Unlike Egypt, you have no easy expansion except in Africa. There isn't a lot of cities, but there are enough to start growing,
@Comrade genz please rewrite this "guide" by taking note of the reactions below and improving the quality. While waiting for your draft I'll close this thread.
