Patton is kinda overrated though, sometimes.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
More polls!
Please log in to post a reply.
Patton is kinda overrated though, sometimes.
Patton wanted to army the German army to invade USSR. What a scum.
Guys I want whoever voted for the panther to either watch the yarnhub cologne tank duel video or read an article on the Pershing
can you give more info? Never heard this before. And ive watched a lot of documentary about ww2.resetname57063228 wrote:
Patton wanted to army the German army to invade USSR. What a scum.
It was because the Soviet Union was gaining power in Eastern Europe and Patton knew that when ww2 was over another war would comeMarshalOfVictory89 wrote:
can you give more info? Never heard this before. And ive watched a lot of documentary about ww2.resetname57063228 wrote:
Patton wanted to army the German army to invade USSR. What a scum.
He was wrong, seeing as we are not extinct.
Carking Pershing or panther
Idk Pershing?
Vote then
i understand, but i want o read it or watch it myself, wont believe in rumors lolThat polish guy wrote:
It was because the Soviet Union was gaining power in Eastern Europe and Patton knew that when ww2 was over another war would comeMarshalOfVictory89 wrote:
can you give more info? Never heard this before. And ive watched a lot of documentary about ww2.resetname57063228 wrote:
Patton wanted to army the German army to invade USSR. What a scum.
Just flying through the ranks thanks to the Argentine Castro
Places
It's just not a fair comparison. Panther is 1943, Pershing is 1945. It is like comparing bow&arrow and howitzers.That polish guy wrote:
Guys I want whoever voted for the panther to either watch the yarnhub cologne tank duel video or read an article on the Pershing
Itβs only two yearsβ¦ more like comparing a Bolt action rifle to a Sub Machine gun.K.Rokossovski wrote:
It's just not a fair comparison. Panther is 1943, Pershing is 1945. It is like comparing bow&arrow and howitzers.That polish guy wrote:
Guys I want whoever voted for the panther to either watch the yarnhub cologne tank duel video or read an article on the Pershing
I canβt believe he armied their army to attack the Red army in combination with the army!resetname57063228 wrote:
Patton wanted to army the German army to invade USSR. What a scum.
Why TF is the Chi-ha even on the list?
Japanese tanks in WW2 are worth about the same as a summers end.
In wartime, two years of weapons development is like a century. Something like the difference between a PzKfw III and a T/34. I think we all know how a poll over those would fare.Carking the 6th wrote:
Itβs only two yearsβ¦ more like comparing a Bolt action rifle to a Sub Machine gun.K.Rokossovski wrote:
That polish guy wrote:
resetname57063228 wrote:
Comet vs T-34? Or even late-war Cromwell vs T-34?K.Rokossovski wrote:
In wartime, two years of weapons development is like a century. Something like the difference between a PzKfw III and a T/34. I think we all know how a poll over those would fare.
Italian too. Exempli gratia the M11/39, or as I call it the "Chi-ha Grant"Carking the 6th wrote:
Japanese tanks in WW2 are worth about the same as a summers end.
But they weren't made to fight British, American, or Soviet tanks. They were meant to fight poorly-equipped infantry in Greece, Ethiopia, and China.
Oh don't get me started on British tanks. They could win polls against Italian and Japanese tanks, sure, and MAYBE even a Valentine vs. M3 Lee... but nothing against German or Soviet tanks.Lord Crayfish wrote:
Comet vs T-34? Or even late-war Cromwell vs T-34?
More polls!
Please log in to post a reply.