Locked

Normal Infantry, Motorized Infantry, or Mechanized Infantry

I use motorized infantry because it is fast and cheap unit to produce. It's more powerful then infantry, but cheaper then mechanized infantry. Its damage values can compare with most mechanized infantry units. In fact it deals more damage against infantry then mechanized infantry does. Just to clarify I am asking what is your preferred type of infantry.

86 Replies

whowh wrote:

RBoi200 wrote:

whowh wrote:

RBoi200 wrote:

whowh wrote:

I always keep my infantry at a low level as a reserve troop that can be spammed in emergencies.
I prefer to spam militia.
That's why you never do playthroughs!!! :D
What does that have to do with playthroughs?
Bad tactics.
Edit: I prefer to spam militia in emergencies.
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

Larry is god lol lol wrote:

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

whowh wrote:

What doctrine do you mainly play? That stack seems extremely effective for pan-asian.
I think Pan-Asian is literally the best doctrine right now. I frankly think it's unbalanced. In an active player's hands it's very hard to fight against. This composition definitely works extremely well for Pan-Asian, but I prefer to focus on more mobile forces with them. They are just so fast. For later game Pan-Asian I would use self-propelled rocket artillery and SPAA instead and stay away from medium and heavy tanks. Infantry stops being a follow up force and is used to hold territory the armored forces storm through. I still use the infantry army throughout the game though and will keep researching upgrades for infantry/ordnance forces also, but it becomes much less of a priority after infantry hit level 5.However, I also play allies and I think this composition works well for them as well. The ability to keep all your forces upgraded and focus your technology on fewer units gives you a serious tech advantage against rivals. In my opinion, this composition is best suited to Allies who are already pretty slow. Your mobile army will just never be that good. Embrace the slow behemoth, build lots of heavy and medium tanks and artillery to support your infantry and they will walk over everything.

Probably wouldn't be ideal for axis or comintern.

i think eather axis or allies is best i love both of them allie infatry is good to as then thread is about
I'm not a big fan of Axis. I see why people like it, but it doesn't really favor my playstyle.
i get it but im good at it so i like it
when being betrayed betray

RBoi200 wrote:

whowh wrote:

RBoi200 wrote:

whowh wrote:

RBoi200 wrote:

whowh wrote:

I always keep my infantry at a low level as a reserve troop that can be spammed in emergencies.
I prefer to spam militia.
That's why you never do playthroughs!!! :D
What does that have to do with playthroughs?
Bad tactics.
Edit: I prefer to spam militia in emergencies.
***Looks the other way pretending not to be doing that right now***

Comintern is quite good. I saw this guy with comintern USSR, he didnt upgrade a thing but instead had 1200 units.....

hIS eUROPE campaign cost him 1500 units, and 1200 was his height AT ONE time

Overall i think he topped 3000

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

GrandEmpire wrote:

Comintern is quite good. I saw this guy with comintern USSR, he didnt upgrade a thing but instead had 1200 units.....

hIS eUROPE campaign cost him 1500 units, and 1200 was his height AT ONE time

Overall i think he topped 3000

That's insane. I can see how that could be effective, murder on your kill-to-death ratio though. I think I would love to fight against someone using that strategy. ;)

Yep, I saw him invade Spain with 500 units he lost 300 of those i think. his armies melted but he brok through. It was interesting to watch

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

GrandEmpire wrote:

Yep, I saw him invade Spain with 500 units he lost 300 of those i think. his armies melted but he brok through. It was interesting to watch
Yeah that just runs totally counter to my playstyle. I've lost 557 total units in 15 games, and a lot of that was in 1.0 where it was much more difficult to keep your units alive. I have probably lost less than 50 units in the last six games.

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

Yeah that just runs totally counter to my playstyle. I've lost 557 total units in 15 games, and a lot of that was in 1.0 where it was much more difficult to keep your units alive. I have probably lost less than 50 units in the last six games.
Nice Flexing
WHOS GONNA CARRY THE BOATS?
WHOS GONNA CARRY THE LOGS?
THEY DON'T KNOW YOU SON!
- David Goggins

BrutusTrump wrote:

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

Yeah that just runs totally counter to my playstyle. I've lost 557 total units in 15 games, and a lot of that was in 1.0 where it was much more difficult to keep your units alive. I have probably lost less than 50 units in the last six games.
Nice Flexing
Hah! It's the truth though. My kill-to-death has been steadily increasing since the introduction of 1.5. I haven't lost a unit in my current game, so technically infinite KTD. I don't play a lot of games so I'm still nothing in the rankings. I guess it makes sense to incentivize people to play as many as possible, more gold gets spent that way. I have been playing HWW for the last three games though with strong countries which makes things a little unfair. In balanced maps, the hardest part of the game for me is the first couple days, my strategy usually starts giving me clear advantage by day 3 or 4. I tend to lose units in early wars because I just don't have the composition to take territory without losses.

but sorry ussaly i really love axis mech inffantry i would alsways use that

when being betrayed betray

whowh wrote:

@Spite_Is_Right your k/d scares me. 6.49 seems very hard to get.
It's actually the highest I've seen other than Gustav The Great who is the number one ranked player. His was around 7.5 last time I looked.

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

whowh wrote:

@Spite_Is_Right your k/d scares me. 6.49 seems very hard to get.
It's actually the highest I've seen other than Gustav The Great who is the number one ranked player. His was around 7.5 last time I looked.
the ranking changed a lot since I last looked. It used to be people with high economic scores(ie play a ton of games) were high but I'm happy to see that the #1 military person is now #1 overall

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

whowh wrote:

@Spite_Is_Right your k/d scares me. 6.49 seems very hard to get.
It's actually the highest I've seen other than Gustav The Great who is the number one ranked player. His was around 7.5 last time I looked.
What about this lol
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!

RBoi200 wrote:

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

whowh wrote:

@Spite_Is_Right your k/d scares me. 6.49 seems very hard to get.
It's actually the highest I've seen other than Gustav The Great who is the number one ranked player. His was around 7.5 last time I looked.
What about this lol
Yeah, that's pretty crazy. I'm guessing that's a new account that hasn't played much yet though. Maintaining it over 120k kills like Gustav has is incredible. I'm still just a baby compared to that guy, I don't even have all my blueprints.

whowh wrote:

Whose's k/d pic is that?
I would rlly like to know that too.
Ѐарис Π‘ΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ›, Π‘ΡƒΠ½Π°

i am thinking of making SP AA or really high AA... i think i should ditch SPAA for AA high levels

"In my humble opinion, on the subject matter, topic and content discussed beforehand; I would like to humbly propose, convey my idea on the subject and remark; this, with the help of the afforementioned post" - Karl von Krass
"The Golden Spire is looking for members, Anyone with good sense of game mechanics and a discord account can apply"
Secretary of Nova0213

whowh wrote:

@Spite_Is_Right your k/d scares me. 6.49 seems very hard to get.
dont forget your friend or rather mine... Aoi... she has 6.63 KD, though she has been really busy lately she had 7.5 something KD when i inducted her.
"In my humble opinion, on the subject matter, topic and content discussed beforehand; I would like to humbly propose, convey my idea on the subject and remark; this, with the help of the afforementioned post" - Karl von Krass
"The Golden Spire is looking for members, Anyone with good sense of game mechanics and a discord account can apply"
Secretary of Nova0213

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

RBoi200 wrote:

Spite_Is_Right wrote:

whowh wrote:

@Spite_Is_Right your k/d scares me. 6.49 seems very hard to get.
It's actually the highest I've seen other than Gustav The Great who is the number one ranked player. His was around 7.5 last time I looked.
What about this lol
Yeah, that's pretty crazy. I'm guessing that's a new account that hasn't played much yet though. Maintaining it over 120k kills like Gustav has is incredible. I'm still just a baby compared to that guy, I don't even have all my blueprints.
Lmao guys cant belive u got fooled he obviously used inspect
β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
Back to Discussions
Quick Launch