Nuclear bombers and range

5 Jun 2016, 13:57

So I have been thinking about this for quite some time now. But Why are Max nuclear bombers range so small?

Like a B-52 when it first rolled out, had a combat range of 8,800 miles!. The nuclear bombers maxed have a range of 560miles (900k) a lot smaller than the b-52s. Now obviously the game is set in this period, However b-36 peacemakers, had ranges of 10,000 miles, If I am correct. They came into service in about 1949 or maybe its 1950.

Now here is the funny part. The level 3 bomber, is a B-47 Stratojet. But guess what, although in game it says it has a range of 560 miles, really it has a range of 3,870 Miles.

So It seems the ranges have been nerfed, so I was thinking, why not unnerf them?

Just this has been bothering me for some time, and this week the forums seemed a little quieter than usually..

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

10 Replies

5 Jun 2016, 14:44

Its good as it is now .

5 Jun 2016, 15:03

HunHarcos wrote:
Its good as it is now .

it could be a little bigger do,

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

5 Jun 2016, 15:19

The radius of the atom bombs are acceptable and should not be changed.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

5 Jun 2016, 17:18

Caesar wrote:
The radius of the atom bombs are acceptable and should not be changed.

Im not talking about the radius of the Atomic bombs..

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

5 Jun 2016, 18:34 (edited)

oceanhawk wrote:
Im not talking about the radius of the Atomic bombs..

oceanhawk wrote:
But Why are Max nuclear bombers range so small?

The range of atomic bombs is according to the atomic bomb in 1945, Ocean.

5 Jun 2016, 19:42

why are you quoting messages without adding content to them?

Pax Romana Communications Officer

5 Jun 2016, 19:53

StrangeTalent wrote:
why are you quoting messages without adding content to them?

Hello Strange.

Ocean said "Im not talking about the radius of the Atomic bombs.." This is not true.

Then, I "quoted" this: ·But Why are Max nuclear bombers range so small?"

5 Jun 2016, 20:15

Caesar wrote:
StrangeTalent wrote:
why are you quoting messages without adding content to them?
Hello Strange.
Ocean said "Im not talking about the radius of the Atomic bombs.." This is not true.
Then, I "quoted" this: ·But Why are Max nuclear bombers range so small?"

Okay, well the Atomic Radius, is the blast radius. How much boom goes all over the place. That is not mentioned anywhere. And that is not at all what I am talking about. I am talking about the range of the nuclear bombers..

A level 3 nuke bomber here ( B--47) has a range of 560miles.

When really, a B-47 with a combat load, has a range of 3870 miles...

I am taking about the bomber range, not the blast radius.

The blast radius, I dont think has ever been mentioned here on the forums

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

5 Jun 2016, 20:22

oceanhawk wrote:
A level 3 nuke bomber here ( B--47) has a range of 560miles.
When really, a B-47 with a combat load, has a range of 3870 miles..

This would need an update.

5 Jun 2016, 20:30

Caesar wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
A level 3 nuke bomber here ( B--47) has a range of 560miles.
When really, a B-47 with a combat load, has a range of 3870 miles..
This would need an update.

I dont follow?

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Discussions