Not if the rule is modified to be for "public" NAP's....then this honor rule could be more easily enforceable by in-game players' self governance (kind of like what Redd Baron has proposed, elsewhere).wildL SPQR wrote:
Impossible to enforceMaximilianvs wrote:
Run me in.Maximilianvs in game and forum.
Note: I have an idea to make a change in the rules. What about if we introduce a maximum of 1 or 2 NAPS at the same time? so this limitation game will be more war and less political.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3

RPU Website Manager