Dear players,
here is a small poll for you. Which of these two generals do you know or even like better?
George S. Patton, US Army general
or
Bernard Montgomery, Field Marshal of the British Army
We would love to hear your opinions and see some discussions here!
Your Call of War Team
Please log in to post a reply.
Monty and Patton, together.Caesar wrote:
Who won in the campaing of the North Africa?
Eisenhower.Caesar wrote:
Who started the campaign of Italy?
Who caused it? Well, the Supreme Allied Commanders at D-Day of course.Caesar wrote:
Who caused the Chambois bag where thousands of Germans were trapped?
I can't even find anything on this.Caesar wrote:
Who won the offensive of Lorena?
Hahaha is that a joke? Patton was inferior to the majority of the German Generals, and the likes of Zhukov.Caesar wrote:
George Patton was better General, his strategy especially during the campaign of Italy served to the fall of the axis in the West.
But in this instance on this poll, well ffs, his strategy in Italy was a joke, and your argument is very very "funny"
Look the poll. They are asked between Montgomery and Patton.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha is that a joke? Patton was inferior to the majority of the German Generals, and the likes of Zhukov.But in this instance on this poll, well ffs, his strategy in Italy was a joke, and your argument is very very "funny"
Dude, Patton was superior to most German generals, except maybe Kesselring, Manstein and Rommel.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha is that a joke? Patton was inferior to the majority of the German Generals, and the likes of Zhukov.
and paulus?Pablo22510 wrote:
Dude, Patton was superior to most German generals, except maybe Kesselring, Manstein and Rommel.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha is that a joke? Patton was inferior to the majority of the German Generals, and the likes of Zhukov.
And Guirden, and RundstedtPablo22510 wrote:
Dude, Patton was superior to most German generals, except maybe Kesselring, Manstein and Rommel.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha is that a joke? Patton was inferior to the majority of the German Generals, and the likes of Zhukov.
There was no one called this.oceanhawk wrote:
Guirden
I dont speak German, but there is somebody called guderianQuasi-duck wrote:
There was no one called this.oceanhawk wrote:
Guirden
I know Guderian, but "Guirden" is nonsense.oceanhawk wrote:
I dont speak German, but there is somebody called guderian
Yeah, errr. Rundstedt wasn't that good. Granted, he defended Holland pretty well, but knowing how awfully planned Market Garden was, it wasn't too difficult. Guderian is a bit controversial. Some people think of him as a genius, equal to Rommel and Manstein, and others think that he was pretty bad.
All in all, I think that only Manstein, Rommel, Kesselring and Model (forgot about him) were better than Patton. Manstein because he revolutionised warfare, Rommel because he constantly beat back Patton at Tunis, and also changed warfare, Kesselring because he was able to hold Patton off in Italy, and Model because he was a pretty good general overall.
And FTR Manstein was better than Rommel, if the two if them were running the warPablo22510 wrote:
Yeah, errr. Rundstedt wasn't that good. Granted, he defended Holland pretty well, but knowing how awfully planned Market Garden was, it wasn't too difficult. Guderian is a bit controversial. Some people think of him as a genius, equal to Rommel and Manstein, and others think that he was pretty bad.All in all, I think that only Manstein, Rommel, Kesselring and Model (forgot about him) were better than Patton. Manstein because he revolutionised warfare, Rommel because he constantly beat back Patton at Tunis, and also changed warfare, Kesselring because he was able to hold Patton off in Italy, and Model because he was a pretty good general overall.
Id say we would be speaking German right now 
Manstein vs Rommel is arguable.oceanhawk wrote:
And FTR Manstein was better than Rommel, if the two if them were running the war
Pablo22510 wrote:
Manstein vs Rommel is arguable.oceanhawk wrote:
And FTR Manstein was better than Rommel, if the two if them were running the war
Not at all, Mantein was better..Pablo22510 wrote:
Manstein vs Rommel is arguable.oceanhawk wrote:
And FTR Manstein was better than Rommel, if the two if them were running the war
And like just google it there, the results on everypage almost say Manstien is better...
Now that doesnt say everything, but does say a lot...
If you google Nazis on the other side of the Moon a lot of things appear claiming that they do in fact live on the other side of the moon.oceanhawk wrote:
Not at all, Mantein was better..And like just google it there, the results on everypage almost say Manstien is better...
Now that doesnt say everything, but does say a lot...
They dont live on the other side of the moon...Pablo22510 wrote:
If you google Nazis on the other side of the Moon a lot of things appear claiming that they do in fact live on the other side of the moon.oceanhawk wrote:
Not at all, Mantein was better..And like just google it there, the results on everypage almost say Manstien is better...
Now that doesnt say everything, but does say a lot...
They prop could have made it there, if they focused on that task, but yea they didnt...
And I meant google, Rommel VS Manstien...
The point I was trying to make is that the Internet isn't the truth. If you Google Nazis on the other side of the Moon, you will get many webpages claiming that they do live on the other side of the Moon. And it obviously isn't true.oceanhawk wrote:
They dont live on the other side of the moon...They prop could have made it there, if they focused on that task, but yea they didnt...
And I meant google, Rommel VS Manstien...
Google Rommel VS Maintein, there are pages upon pages of historians stating that Manstein was a better general..Pablo22510 wrote:
The point I was trying to make is that the Internet isn't the truth. If you Google Nazis on the other side of the Moon, you will get many webpages claiming that they do live on the other side of the Moon. And it obviously isn't true.oceanhawk wrote:
They dont live on the other side of the moon...They prop could have made it there, if they focused on that task, but yea they didnt...
And I meant google, Rommel VS Manstien...
The Internet isnt the truth, but historians know a good bit of information, and guess where you can find them?
Here are just 4 random pages I took, when I googled Manstien VS Rommel...
Apparently, even guderian acknowledged that Mainstein was the best
https://www.quora.com/Who-was-a-better-general-Von-Manstein-Rommel-or-Guderian
http://historum.com/speculative-history/62356-mainstein-vs-rommel-who-better-general.html
Errr, none of those pages have confirmed historians. Find me a thesis.
I recall reading that Patton bitch slapped one of his soldiers and called him a coward because he was suffering from PTSD, or "Cowardice" As Patton put it. If anyone here would like to view Patton's exploits however WITH evidence and facts from ACTUAL historians watch these.
okay, but while you are at it, find me one historical source that shows Rommel to be better...Pablo22510 wrote:
Errr, none of those pages have confirmed historians. Find me a thesis.
Please log in to post a reply.
