??TheZhukov wrote:
I'm not a genius but i know the rudiments pretty well
20 Apr 2023, 03:31
Share your favorite stacks!
Ever had those moments where you make a killer stack and you feel so good about it? I just did. Day 9 in World at War, and I know that no one else will rule the seas with this stack around 
And take a peek at the stats:
A perfect all-around naval stack.
Anyways, feel free to share your favorites here as well. I'll be posting more stacks here whenever I get really good ones.
P.S. Advice for Naval players: Allied and Pan Asian doctrines are great!
โA battle fought without determination is a battle lost.โ - Josip Broz Tito
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
156 Replies
20 Apr 2023, 03:32
Rachellreist wrote:
why would you build rrg with you already have plenty of arty. Also at is pretty useless if you have medium or heavy tank already.
Now I know you're trolling
You build RRG when your opponent has strong arty (so your arty would suffer), and they have good air cover (so your bombers would suffer). This is when a lot of games turn to RRG. It usually doesn't start with RRG, it escalates to RRG.
And what is that about AT being useless, are you high? If your opponent is building heavy tanks, you go all in on anti-tank units. Attack bombers, artillery, and your last line of defense are AT guns or tank destroyers. These defensive units will keep the tanks off of your artillery so the artillery can keep shooting, not getting run over.
You never throw tanks into tanks, or arty into arty, that's like bashing a rock into a rock. Think rock/paper/scissors.
20 Apr 2023, 03:33
But rrg is crap air defense
20 Apr 2023, 03:33
Tanks are terrible substitutes for ATs, except maybe TDs in certain situations. The best AT substitute is AA. I'd argue that AA makes AT essentially unnecessary in most good stacks.
20 Apr 2023, 03:33
If you read the post, youโd see a primary strategy is to add AA, since they donโt slow the stack down.Rachellreist wrote:
But rrg is crap air defense
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
20 Apr 2023, 03:34
Someone earlier said aa slows down the stackCarking the 6th wrote:
If you read the post, youโd see a primary strategy is to add AA, since they donโt slow the stack down.Rachellreist wrote:
But rrg is crap air defense
20 Apr 2023, 03:35
lots of people sayjubjub bird wrote:
Tanks are terrible substitutes for ATs, except maybe TDs in certain situations. The best AT substitute is AA. I'd argue that AA makes AT essentially unnecessary in most good stacks.
at is crap unit
20 Apr 2023, 03:37
They say to keep rrg separate form your main stackTheZhukov wrote:
Militia are good for defense in dangerous situationsRRG are like long range heavy artillery, very hard to beat
Very good against big stacks
So they can attack from a distance
20 Apr 2023, 03:49
Not for RRG, they are so slow they donโt slow down.Rachellreist wrote:
Someone earlier said aa slows down the stackCarking the 6th wrote:
If you read the post, youโd see a primary strategy is to add AA, since they donโt slow the stack down.Rachellreist wrote:
But rrg is crap air defense
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
20 Apr 2023, 04:29
Very true, especially at higher levels, especially Axis doctrine.jubjub bird wrote:
Tanks are terrible substitutes for ATs, except maybe TDs in certain situations. The best AT substitute is AA. I'd argue that AA makes AT essentially unnecessary in most good stacks.
What a lot of people do is look at their starting AA unit, and try to use is to fight infantry on day 1, and it's terrible. Level 1 AA fighting infantry, the worst possible matchup. So they think "AA sucks" and they never build one again.
What they fail to realize is that high-level AA is an amazing unit, when used properly. Which is to defend against airplanes and heavy armor. But those units don't appear on day 1, so they never try it, and since they don't look at the actual stats of units at different levels, they have no clue about AA or good unit usage generally
20 Apr 2023, 04:39
The same can be said for any unit.z00mz00m wrote:
Very true, especially at higher levels, especially Axis doctrine.jubjub bird wrote:
Tanks are terrible substitutes for ATs, except maybe TDs in certain situations. The best AT substitute is AA. I'd argue that AA makes AT essentially unnecessary in most good stacks.What a lot of people do is look at their starting AA unit, and try to use is to fight infantry on day 1, and it's terrible. Level 1 AA fighting infantry, the worst possible matchup. So they think "AA sucks" and they never build one again.
What they fail to realize is that high-level AA is an amazing unit, when used properly. Which is to defend against airplanes and heavy armor. But those units don't appear on day 1, so they never try it, and since they don't look at the actual stats of units at different levels, they have no clue about AA or good unit usage generally
There are lots of players that simply donโt understand things like stealth units, terrain bonuses, upgrading, and the benefits of ranged combat.
โA battle fought without determination is a battle lost.โ - Josip Broz Tito
20 Apr 2023, 04:40
@Rachellreist. Apparently you fail the test
โA battle fought without determination is a battle lost.โ - Josip Broz Tito
20 Apr 2023, 13:37
Yup. You could say that the worst AA advocate is that it is in the initial unit stacks.z00mz00m wrote:
What a lot of people do is look at their starting AA unit, and try to use is to fight infantry on day 1, and it's terrible. Level 1 AA fighting infantry, the worst possible matchup. So they think "AA sucks" and they never build one again.jubjub bird wrote:
20 Apr 2023, 16:31
my iq is at least 80Brando Dilla wrote:
@Rachellreist. Apparently you fail the test
20 Apr 2023, 21:13
80! Thatโs so high! OMG!Rachellreist wrote:
my iq is at least 80Brando Dilla wrote:
@Rachellreist. Apparently you fail the test
็ฅๅทฑ็ฅๅฝผ๏ผ็พๆไธๆฎ
20 Apr 2023, 21:55
Sooooo high I never could have expected thisโฆ 80โฆDestructo the Great wrote:
80! Thatโs so high! OMG!Rachellreist wrote:
my iq is at least 80Brando Dilla wrote:
@Rachellreist. Apparently you fail the test
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
20 Apr 2023, 23:49
@Destructo the Great @Carking the 6th Apparently you fail the test
โA battle fought without determination is a battle lost.โ - Josip Broz Tito
21 Apr 2023, 05:00
The stack of 20/22 of my remaining brain cells! They died!Brando Dilla wrote:
@Destructo the Great @Carking the 6th Apparently you fail the test
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
21 Apr 2023, 07:47
Shut up, Brando. There's really no reason to keep shouting to us to stay on topic, interesting viewpoints are developing and do you really want to stop that?? The subject in itself is uninteresting (there ARE no favorite stacks, they are task-based), if you're irritated about that take the thread from your watch list. Many threads derail, I remember a recent thread about playing France HWW into a heated debate about overstacking iirc; what is wrong with this one and saying it every 10 seconds, even connecting the issue to people's intelligence??Brando Dilla wrote:
@Destructo the Great @Carking the 6th Apparently you fail the test
So basically, FU and STFU, you're not a mod here and it seems you're the only one who takes offense in this. Get lost.
So, what is your favorite method of growing tulips?
21 Apr 2023, 08:30
They need to grow more Panjimian tulips.
The President
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
