submarines + aircraft carriers

If we have seperate stacks 10 submarines + 10 submarines + 10 submarines ....

and a few aircraft carriers including ınterceptors

when we see enemy battleships+cruisers+destroyers stack on sea ( most player use this type stack )

send all submarines 10-10-10-10 to enemy ships and hold close aircraft carriers to submarines against enemy naval bombers

ıt seems we dont need other ships ? what do you think ? high level submarines and aircraft carriers can do it ?

9 Replies

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both do massive damage to air units

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers
you can add a few battleships to the stack for that, they can defend against air. they are also useful in case you meet destroyers Or cruisers because they are reasonably strong against subs.

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers
you can add a few battleships to the stack for that, they can defend against air. they are also useful in case you meet destroyers Or cruisers because they are reasonably strong against subs.
how battleships will defend submarines against air while submarines attacking to enemy ships ?? and battleships dont have high anti air value

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers
you can add a few battleships to the stack for that, they can defend against air. they are also useful in case you meet destroyers Or cruisers because they are reasonably strong against subs.
how battleships will defend submarines against air while submarines attacking to enemy ships ?? and battleships dont have high anti air value
They have relatively high anti air value, so that a battleship will destroy a naval bomber before the naval bomber destroys the battleship.

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers
you can add a few battleships to the stack for that, they can defend against air. they are also useful in case you meet destroyers Or cruisers because they are reasonably strong against subs.
how battleships will defend submarines against air while submarines attacking to enemy ships ?? and battleships dont have high anti air value
They have relatively high anti air value, so that a battleship will destroy a naval bomber before the naval bomber destroys the battleship.
I looked from allies doctrine naval bombers has 27 attack value battleship has 4 anti air value

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers
you can add a few battleships to the stack for that, they can defend against air. they are also useful in case you meet destroyers Or cruisers because they are reasonably strong against subs.
how battleships will defend submarines against air while submarines attacking to enemy ships ?? and battleships dont have high anti air value
They have relatively high anti air value, so that a battleship will destroy a naval bomber before the naval bomber destroys the battleship.
I looked from allies doctrine naval bombers has 27 attack value battleship has 4 anti air value
what level was the naval bomber and battleship? Also look at normal CoW 1.0 so it is not changed in any way.

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

Undaunted wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

they can but you don’t need the aircraft carriers cause battleships and cruisers both food massive damage to air units
aircraft carriers to carry ınterceptors ınterceptors to defend submarines against enemy naval bombers ıf enemy hasnt any plane then dont need to carriers
you can add a few battleships to the stack for that, they can defend against air. they are also useful in case you meet destroyers Or cruisers because they are reasonably strong against subs.
how battleships will defend submarines against air while submarines attacking to enemy ships ?? and battleships dont have high anti air value
yes, only cruiser deal high defence damage to air units
hi

BBs have low AA relative to their cost and firepower.

CCs or CVs are your choices for AA-platforms.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Discussions
Quick Launch