Sweden vs Germany?

I am playing as Sweden in the 10-player even map. It is day 4, hour 22ish, and I am thinking about invading Germany (also controls Czechoslovakia, Holland, and most of Denmark). I also control Finland. Here is my army:

23 lvl1 infantry

2 lvl1 armored cars

3 lvl1 AA batteries

3 lvl1 interceptors

This is his army (we're allies, and I might backstab him):

18 lvl1 infantry

2 lvl1 armored cars

2 lvl1 AA batteries

We both have 4% tech (as of day 3, probably changed), and I have 8% military to his 6%.

Also, my ally the Soviet Union has:

1 lvl1 militia

19 lvl1 infantry

3 lvl1 armored cars

3 lvl1 AA batteries

Britain is officially my ally (he gave me share map, and I gave him peace), but I am pushing them around. I made him a deal: share map for 10,000 food.

Here are my resources:

234 food +9/hr

9755 goods +557/hr

13186 manpower +172/hr

11231 metal +497/hr

5042 oil +213/hr

1503 rare materials +144/hr

30094 +2032/hr

Should I attack??? Please answer the poll and leave an explanation.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

14 Replies

No chance that the players controlling Germany or UK will read this?

:00008172:


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Numbers are not everything..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

I say yes! Numbers may not mean anything, but you have overwhelming odds in your favor. Only problem might be food.

Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton

WayneBo wrote:

No chance that the players controlling Germany or UK will read this?
No chance.

I'm also producing 1 interceptor and 5 light tanks.

No. Don't backstab an ally.

purplepizza117 wrote:

No. Don't backstab an ally.
purplepizza117, I disagree. (I did read the thread "Those Backstabbing Allies") I will invade them because I can enter their territory.

Have they been a fulfilling ally to you? Have you talked to them about strategic discussions before? If not, they aren't really a true ally to you. Therefore the label was wrong, and you should invade them. But if they have been even a somewhat satisfactory ally don't attack him.

purplepizza117 wrote:

Have they been a fulfilling ally to you? Have you talked to them about strategic discussions before? If not, they aren't really a true ally to you. Therefore the label was wrong, and you should invade them. But if they have been even a somewhat satisfactory ally don't attack him.
Sounds like the right thing to do, but I don't know which category they are in.

NYCSBoy13 wrote:

Sounds like the right thing to do, but I don't know which category they are in.
I am just holding you up, I know, but what have they done for you? Have you done anything for them? If not, I say go for it!

Are you really debating this?

Just attack the guy, end of story numbers are not the biggest factor in this game,

just attack and enjoy it :)


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Here's what you do:

Secretly move your army to all of his production centers-without conflict, because you're allies.

Then declare war and they should suddenly start shooting.

Capture his production and starve his army of reinforcements or supplies.

And then you win.

omnisxiii2 wrote:

Here's what you do:

Secretly move your army to all of his production centers-without conflict, because you're allies.

Then declare war and they should suddenly start shooting.

Capture his production and starve his army of reinforcements or supplies.

And then you win.

Correct, I think that is generally the idea.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Discussions
Quick Launch