You mean "pan-asian" not imperial right?
What is the BEST Doctrine in your Opinion.
What is you favorite and best Doctrine out of all of them?
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
23 Replies
I prefer allies as the research time reduction and production time gives it my vote.
Of course they are slower than most but IF you can last long enough in a game, -2 day for getting the nuke is just great is disarming Jumbo stacks that have little AA defence (I know most people don't use it or like it). It infantry may suck except commandos, it tanks may lack speed of true blitzkrieg, but late game it becomes a powerhouse if used right.
I want my lawyer
Yea the prod time for allies is just scary in the late game.over4night wrote:
I prefer allies as the research time reduction and production time gives it my vote.Of course they are slower than most but IF you can last long enough in a game, -2 day for getting the nuke is just great is disarming Jumbo stacks that have little AA defence (I know most people don't use it or like it). It infantry may suck except commandos, it tanks may lack speed of true blitzkrieg, but late game it becomes a powerhouse if used right.
Reduced research time also helps a lot when it gets to the point where researches takes a full day or more to finish.
Pan-Asian's still my favorite tho
Meanwhile atomic bomber over Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Rest in peace
I want my lawyer
Pan-Asian Interceptors with +20% ms, -1/-2 availability, +15% range and +15% dmg vs planes: don't try it
True, would not do it against a active pan-asian player with a air force, but worth a shot.
I want my lawyer
If they had my Italian units, ii would go with that instead. Because I know for a fact i would win easily.
Since the last update allies become my favorite, before it was the weakest and hated it, but now OMG that strategic bomber range is god, im feeling like a mad villain destroying everything.
well Italian performance on WW2 was really really bad.Captain Chip wrote:
If they had my Italian units, ii would go with that instead. Because I know for a fact i would win easily.
Zitto according to most it was good. They were just well equipped and not reinforced by their dumb ally. Also YOU ARE TALKING TO AN ITALIAN!
How Germany lost WW1 & WW2 in a nutshellCaptain Chip wrote:
not reinforced by their dumb ally
I prefer Axis because it gives me a strong advantage in the early game of having stronger units than everyone else. You can build stacks of Motorized infantry and Medium tanks since they get +15% damage and +10% hitpoints respectively on top of the 15% damage and hitpoints they already have. Attack bombers also have +30% damage against tanks and infantry which help late-game against armoured units. Yeah, the cost is a bit much but after awhile you don't even notice.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana
KNOW THE RULES!
Call of War Game Rules
Call of War Forum Rules
Terms of Service
attacker 101
Call of War Player
EN Server | Bytro Labs Gmbh
Itally can't even take greece, their navy and air force were good but no exceptional, their land forces were terrible, their leadership incompetent, their equipment was low in quality and quantity, their logistics were terrible, their industry couldn't keep up with the needs of the army. Etc, etc.Captain Chip wrote:
Zitto according to most it was good. They were just well equipped and not reinforced by their dumb ally. Also YOU ARE TALKING TO AN ITALIAN!
So I chose communist as mine and ill get to why in a second now I know this thread only asked for my favorite, but I want to list all of them by the ones I like most. First is Communist as you know second is Axis third Pan-Asian and forth would be allies. So I decided communist was my favorite because the artillery is amazing, the lowest cost out of all the other artillery in the game, and that decrease in production time is great. Also, their heavy tanks are extraordinary and generally speaking I feel it's incredibly underrated the lower cost for units is especially useful early game and becomes less so later on though it still holds significance in my opinion. I play Comintern a lot, so I would know as in comparison to axis or the other doctrines. This lower cost allows for more resources to go towards industrial developments, I find myself having a better economy as Comintern a lot earlier than with other doctrines the ability to produce a large amount of troops in my opinion negates the damage deficit in comparison to the other doctrines the amount of infantry you can produce is insane and easily out matches the allies ability to do so due to your lower cost. When you aren't growing fast, having this doctrine makes all the difference as well. Anyway that's my favorite, I'm aware a lot of people consider it the worst, so yeah.
OH you are wrong dead wrong! Example of the greatest unit in the entire army: Alpine Corps.Danieliyoverde123 wrote:
Itally can't even take greece, their navy and air force were good but no exceptional, their land forces were terrible, their leadership incompetent, their equipment was low in quality and quantity, their logistics were terrible, their industry couldn't keep up with the needs of the army. Etc, etc.Captain Chip wrote:
Zitto according to most it was good. They were just well equipped and not reinforced by their dumb ally. Also YOU ARE TALKING TO AN ITALIAN!
Also inside I am doing this:

Why do you think Italy won those two wars. We were smart to realize it. Plus the Germans were really dumb. They didnt even let the generals use tactics that would win the war.Z. Sakki wrote:
How Germany lost WW1 & WW2 in a nutshellCaptain Chip wrote:
not reinforced by their dumb ally
Well not smart enough to realize I was talking about Italy as being the burden which costed Germany both World Wars lol. The "dumb ally" who "hadn't reinforced" Germany in the slightest.Captain Chip wrote:
Why do you think Italy won those two wars. We were smart to realize it. Plus the Germans were really dumb. They didnt even let the generals use tactics that would win the war.Z. Sakki wrote:
How Germany lost WW1 & WW2 in a nutshellCaptain Chip wrote:
not reinforced by their dumb ally
And Italy was on the losing side of WW2. She was a victor at the first tho... but only because she treacherously backstabbed Germany lololol
She won the war! We joined Allies! WE WON THE BLOODY DAMN WAR!
"Italy was well equipped" loooooooooool surely you have to be trolling
Chris kamara
Believe me. A big part of their motivation to join was to expand with the same mentality of the Roman Empire in Northern Africa and the Mediterranean. They were overall successful! We won the war. We had the Italian Panther that was in some cases better than the German ones. We had the P-40 which was nicknamed the Italian T-34 becuase it was just as good! Germasn said the T-34 was the best tank in the world so this would be the same case for the Italian one.
You forgot to mention that the reason italy was successful was because of germany. you got your ass kicked in greece and north africa until the Germans took over the balkans and sent help. and in north africa rommel saved your ass.
and also the The p40 only 100 were made. if it was the "Italian t34" you would think they would make more.
also you know why? italy only made 100 p40s cuz it had no industry italy was heavily lacking industry. italy was by far the worst preforming nation in ww2 by far it. doesn't matter how many excuse you make. as once wise man said facts don't care about your feelings
Chris kamara
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.