Your most Desired Feature

Hey guys, so I know a lot of us have features or mechanics that we want to see in the game. So I wanted to hear some of them and discuss them between us. Every idea is valid so don't feel be afraid to post it. I hope to not see anyone bashing anyone else's idea this should all be in good fun. Anyways as you guys can probably guess due to my previous post I would really love to see super heavy tanks added in. What would you like to see in game and why do you think it should be added?

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

105 Replies

What planes I think should be added.

*CARGO PLANES*

I am working on researching German and Soviet planes! All of these facts are from http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/ww2-transport-aircraft.asp you should go to that website it has good facts about everything from the use of firearms to modern era!

American

lv.1-Douglas DC-2, Crew was any where from 3-14 and was used during the start of American involvement in WWII.

lv.2-Curtiss-Wright C-46 Commando,Had a crew of 4 it was basically a C-47 but bigger or smaller, I do not know much of this aircraft, it was used to drop troops though.

lv.3-Consolidated B-24 "Liberator", this was a bomber but some variants were outfitted to carry 20 soldiers. This was know as the C-87,C-87A,C-87B the A was for VIP and could hold 16 people and the A was a proposed gun ship, much like the AC-130.

lv.4-Douglas C-47, this could drop several airborne soldiers and other versions could hold a Willy jeep, other variants could hold many more soldiers, the C-53, this plane was smaller than the C-46 but, was an iconic symbol of WWII

lv.5-Boeing XB-15 "Grandpappy", Biggest Airplane made by America at that time, had a crew of 10 and to repair the wings a ground crew member would have to crawl inside the plane, they made tunnels for those people. They could hold more than a few Willy jeeps, they never actually went to war. (The tunnels were inside the plane's wings, these planes were MASSIVE!)

I would like to see another Secret unit, this unit would be called the "Helicopter" READ THE REST FIRST! So, it would be an ultra-fast unit that has a large range (Same as a Tactical bomber) it would have a large field of view too, it would be a scout helicopter, a Lvl.5 helicopter could be a jolly green giant from Korea and early Vietnam. I know the Germans were the first to use these as I have seen pictures of them, they were very weak and had almost no defense. Or something like a sniper tower you can build to watch over land, it would have an EXTREMELY large view distance and would be a defense/early warning thing.

I would like to see an option to surrender your army to another army, like you can surrender your army to a large enemy force and then they go to the closest PoW camp your enemy has, you have the ability to liberate them but you have to take the province first, then only MIlitia and Infantry can guard them, the PoWs will become infantry but have less stats as infantry (-2 from each infantry stat depending on the level(?))

PARATROOPERS

We need Paratroopers. At least in the blitz games. It happends to me all the time whenever I bomb an island I killl all the troops. Then when I disembark and there are allready people who stole that island from me as they were closer. I do really need paratroopers.

MARINES

Marines are also quite an important feature. They could fight against the enemy while acctually having some strength while disembaking. This would also help a lot.

HELICOPTERS?

I heard that there were helicopters in WW2 and I think that it would be cool to have a helicopter in Call of War also.

Submarines with rocket hatches

Some subarines have rocket hatches and that would be cool if we had like and carrier sub that carries rockets and then shoots them, only rockets above lvl1.

"May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't"
-George S. Patton
"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"
- Albert Einstein

FilipALFA wrote:

HELICOPTERS?

I heard that there were helicopters in WW2 and I think that it would be cool to have a helicopter in Call of War also.

Yup, German ones.

I wrote about that! IF you guys have any Soviet or German Cargo Planes please tell me so I can finish writing my thing.

Paratroopers. Just give me paratroopers and i'll be happy.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

FilipALFA wrote:

HELICOPTERS?

I heard that there were helicopters in WW2

There were definitely helicopters by the 50s, which is when the tech tree ends.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

I love the stealth options mentioned by Carl, exactly how he proposes them. More realistic, easy to implement (I think) because there is already a unit with these features and makes for some surprise tactics.

Other options I would like to see:

- Increased difficulty in managing economy. Even my 5 year old niece can do it with ease. Look at your neighbor coders at the next desk - supremacy - for inspiration. The stock market will actually see some use, too!

- more diplomatic options and repercussions of those options postive and negative, for instance ability to do a NAP diplomatically (if 2 players so desire...or not) via an ingame feature

- medals/achievements for all to see (again, look at supremacy)

- wider range of statistics (...supremacy again, only even more of them)

- No, I dont want foundries, farms and whatnot that are available in the 1001 clash of clans and other 'build improvements in city, wait, fight, repeat ad infinitum' games out there. This game is unique - I would like it to stay that way.

- More/better options to create a game, such as game is full (important for alliance matches for instance), or different filter options (think peace period, player level etc).

- Have a yearly tournament. You know you want to, it brings in loads of cash for Bytro after all

While it seems from my post I think S1914 is a better game - it isnt. I just would like to see the best options from there being ported here:).

Im sure Im forgetting lots of major and minor stuff, but hope this will be read and appreciated by the devs:)

*CARGO PLANES*

Soviet

Most of the planes the Soviets used were copies or were American planes.

German

Lv.1-Dornier Do 24, Used during the start of the German "Blitzkrieg" and it could hold quite a few soldiers.

Lv.2-Arado Ar 232, used in 1941 through the end of the war, more than capable of ferrying troops. It had a crew of 4, it had some pretty impressive weaponry.

Ugh, too sick to continue! Sorry, will update this later!

JCS Darragh wrote:

Most of the planes the Soviets used were copies or were American planes.
Ehm, no. They were converted bombers, just like the Brits used. Do your research.

JCS Darragh wrote:

German

Lv.1-Dornier Do 24, Used during the start of the German "Blitzkrieg" and it could hold quite a few soldiers.

Lv.2-Arado Ar 232, used in 1941 through the end of the war, more than capable of ferrying troops. It had a crew of 4, it had some pretty impressive weaponry.

Ehm, JU-52?

I would like to see some sort of paratrooper (air) unit or amphibious (marine) unit added to the game.

I would agree, The Marines could have some sort of fighting capability while disembarking to fight off the enemy, they could also board ships and do many other things. Paratroopers, well, to be frank, many people want different things to deal with Airborne units, I would prefer them to be infantry but require more resources to use and can do more damage (When dug in, which I want that to be a feature)

JCS Darragh wrote:

can do more damage
This makes no sense! Why does everyone suggest it?! Para cannot carry heavy weaponry and if they do have gliders that bring a few tanks, they are light tanks that get wrecked by 50. cals. They should be weaker than standard infantry.

JCS Darragh wrote:

they could also board ships
Wow! Hadn't thought of that. Nice idea.

Quasi-duck wrote:

JCS Darragh wrote:

can do more damage
This makes no sense! Why does everyone suggest it?! Para cannot carry heavy weaponry and if they do have gliders that bring a few tanks, they are light tanks that get wrecked by 50. cals. They should be weaker than standard infantry.
They have the same weaponry as infantry, only better trained.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

They have the same weaponry as infantry, only better trained.
They don't. They lack heavy weapons.

Quasi-duck wrote:

They don't. They lack heavy weapons.
If by heavy weapons you mean artillery, they also had them. And they're better trained.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

If by heavy weapons you mean artillery, they also had them.
Not as much as standard infantry. They also lacked trucks, most gear when dropped was often damaged or lost.

Pablo22510 wrote:

And they're better trained.
Not necessarily. Some German paratroopers learned how to use their 'chutes on their first jump at the Bulge.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

If by heavy weapons you mean artillery, they also had them.
Not as much as standard infantry. They also lacked trucks, most gear when dropped was often damaged or lost.

Pablo22510 wrote:

And they're better trained.
Not necessarily. Some German paratroopers learned how to use their 'chutes on their first jump at the Bulge.
If they're so bad, explain their successes at Crete and Normandy.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

If they're so bad, explain their successes at Crete and Normandy.
Crete was a Pyrrhic victory. On top of this the Commonwealth forces had an awful time. In fact, they only had a few tanks but one got put out of commission because it got stuck in a ditch. Also, Crete cost so many men that the German High Command never used the paratroopers as paratroopers until the Bulge because Crete went so bad.

Normandy, well, come on. Some of the troops there were children, what do you expect?

Quasi-duck wrote:

Crete was a Pyrrhic victory. On top of this the Commonwealth forces had an awful time. In fact, they only had a few tanks but one got put out of commission because it got stuck in a ditch. Also, Crete cost so many men that the German High Command never used the paratroopers as paratroopers until the Bulge because Crete went so bad.

Normandy, well, come on. Some of the troops there were children, what do you expect?

Crete was a Pyrrhic victory, yes, bu they still bloody took it.

Normandy was not only defended by kids. Many Eastern Front vets were also there.

The past is a foreign country.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Discussions
Quick Launch