Which one would win?
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Attention, General!
Clad in heavy armor, a new opponent approaches! Based on the historical Churchill Crocodile, this fearsome foe excels at storming fortified positions and fighting unarmored opponents.
This tank can take a beating and still push forward. Its front-mounted flamethrower disregards the protective embrace of fortifications and unleashes devastating hellfire upon unarmored foes and buildings. This makes the Flame Tank the ultimate weapon for breaching enemy defensive lines.
But be careful when deploying your Flame Tank, it is weak against heavy armored units and air attacks. So make sure to give the newest addition to your arsenal adequate protection!

The Churchill Crocodile variant will be available for allied doctrine players. All non-allied doctrines will have access to captured variants. Do not worry, they are just as lethal as the original and come with the same capabilities and stats!
New Deployment Mechanic
The Flame Tank also comes with a new deployment mechanic. It can not be researched and produced like a traditional unit, but instead will be deployed via new Unit Cards from your inventory. Unit Cards will be available as a reward for advancing through Operations. Besides the new Flame Tank, participating in Operations will also reward you with other units already existing in Call of War. For balancing reasons, deployment of units from Unit Cards come with a set of rules:

Please log in to post a reply.
Which one would win?
They both suck against eachother because they hardpoint infantry.Carking the 6th wrote:
Which one would win?
Like literally 75% of units… still. One would win…
Imagine its a tie and they both dieCarking the 6th wrote:
Like literally 75% of units… still. One would win…
I would die as well
Hey, I like more British UnitsFox-Company wrote:
Water Tank when it meets Fire Tank: (Why are they both British too)
Dxcalc.comCarking the 6th wrote:
Like literally 75% of units… still. One would win…
Horse Infantry!
Once we find the stats… I’ll give them to him.Zaktty wrote:
Hey, I like more British UnitsFox-Company wrote:
Water Tank when it meets Fire Tank: (Why are they both British too)Dxcalc.comCarking the 6th wrote:
Like literally 75% of units… still. One would win…
wHy Is ThIs ThReAd StIlL aLiVe
The unrelenting dedication of forum users to turn threads way off-topic for no particular reason, that's why._Pyth0n_ wrote:
wHy Is ThIs ThReAd StIlL aLiVe
Yeah, lets kill it._Pyth0n_ wrote:
wHy Is ThIs ThReAd StIlL aLiVe
Kill it with fire.
This update gonna be fire.
Also, can we consider how these units were only really used by Britain in the war? These are such minor units! Come on Bytro, we know you are better than this!
Come on Bytro,, please just ignore this post.Talvisota wrote:
Also, can we consider how these units were only really used by Britain in the war? These are such minor units! Come on Bytro, we know you are better than this!
As Talvisota (a British person) tries to undo years of work introducing more commonwealth units.
Mate every time I try to agree with you, you contradict. Bro what am I meant to say at this pointZaktty wrote:
Come on Bytro,, please just ignore this post.Talvisota wrote:
Also, can we consider how these units were only really used by Britain in the war? These are such minor units! Come on Bytro, we know you are better than this!As Talvisota (a British person) tries to undo years of work introducing more commonwealth units.
Nothing, you must pay for your heresy.Talvisota wrote:
Mate every time I try to agree with you, you contradict. Bro what am I meant to say at this pointZaktty wrote:
Come on Bytro,, please just ignore this post.As Talvisota (a British person) tries to undo years of work introducing more commonwealth units.Talvisota wrote:
Also, can we consider how these units were only really used by Britain in the war? These are such minor units! Come on Bytro, we know you are better than this!
Eh we built like half your stuff you don’t get any representation
I went to his wall and said sorry, he seemed chill with it, what do you want me to do?Zaktty wrote:
Nothing, you must pay for your heresy.Talvisota wrote:
Mate every time I try to agree with you, you contradict. Bro what am I meant to say at this pointZaktty wrote:
Come on Bytro,, please just ignore this post.As Talvisota (a British person) tries to undo years of work introducing more commonwealth units.Talvisota wrote:
Also, can we consider how these units were only really used by Britain in the war? These are such minor units! Come on Bytro, we know you are better than this!
ZAKTTY, YOU ARE RUINING THE ANGLO ALLIANCE ON THE FORUM, THERE ARE FEW OF US!
Technically speaking, we are all anglophones.Talvisota wrote:
I went to his wall and said sorry, he seemed chill with it, what do you want me to do?Zaktty wrote:
Nothing, you must pay for your heresy.Talvisota wrote:
Mate every time I try to agree with you, you contradict. Bro what am I meant to say at this pointZaktty wrote:
Come on Bytro,, please just ignore this post.As Talvisota (a British person) tries to undo years of work introducing more commonwealth units.Talvisota wrote:
Also, can we consider how these units were only really used by Britain in the war? These are such minor units! Come on Bytro, we know you are better than this!ZAKTTY, YOU ARE RUINING THE ANGLO ALLIANCE ON THE FORUM, THERE ARE FEW OF US!
Please log in to post a reply.