I will one day, I’ll probably make it a playthrough or something. But for the next while or so, I’ll be hoarding.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Attention, General!
Clad in heavy armor, a new opponent approaches! Based on the historical Churchill Crocodile, this fearsome foe excels at storming fortified positions and fighting unarmored opponents.
This tank can take a beating and still push forward. Its front-mounted flamethrower disregards the protective embrace of fortifications and unleashes devastating hellfire upon unarmored foes and buildings. This makes the Flame Tank the ultimate weapon for breaching enemy defensive lines.
But be careful when deploying your Flame Tank, it is weak against heavy armored units and air attacks. So make sure to give the newest addition to your arsenal adequate protection!

The Churchill Crocodile variant will be available for allied doctrine players. All non-allied doctrines will have access to captured variants. Do not worry, they are just as lethal as the original and come with the same capabilities and stats!
New Deployment Mechanic
The Flame Tank also comes with a new deployment mechanic. It can not be researched and produced like a traditional unit, but instead will be deployed via new Unit Cards from your inventory. Unit Cards will be available as a reward for advancing through Operations. Besides the new Flame Tank, participating in Operations will also reward you with other units already existing in Call of War. For balancing reasons, deployment of units from Unit Cards come with a set of rules:

Please log in to post a reply.
I will one day, I’ll probably make it a playthrough or something. But for the next while or so, I’ll be hoarding.
35 kills in one day with the flammenpanzer
They definitely need to add an achievement for that thing. That might drive hoarders to produce them...
It’s easy for killsjubjub bird wrote:
They definitely need to add an achievement for that thing. That might drive hoarders to produce them...
I'm just saying that any form of axis/soviet 'marines' were in no way as historically significant as allied/japanese.Carking the 6th wrote:
I think Italian/German ones invaded Malta, right? Also Denmark and Norway?Wikipedia even says the Germans have a force:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seebataillon
So it should be doable. For the Soviets…
The Naval Infantry conducted over 114 landings, most of which were carried out by platoons and companies. In general, however, Naval Infantry served as regular infantry, without any amphibious training. They conducted four major operations: two during the Battle of the Kerch Peninsula, one during the Caucasus Campaign and one as part of the Landing at Moonsund, in the Baltic.
Axis ones invaded Norway though, I think they are important. Sure Soviets didn’t, but still, it’s alt history lol.
Of course. We now just have to wait for Flame Tank doctrine variants.
Ye a buncha units IRL were only used by one side. I think a buncha Pan-Asian tech was either experimental or barely used in the actual war but are represented as functioning units in CoW. Same theory should apply to marines.Carking the 6th wrote:
Axis ones invaded Norway though, I think they are important. Sure Soviets didn’t, but still, it’s alt history lol.
They can't make those until they are producible. Imagine an Allied FT, barely any benefits: no production buff (can't be produced), no research buff (can't be researched) and unclear if FTs can be upgraded or not. Meanwhile, they have their -10% speed debuff, which makes it pretty bad. They could, I suppose, alter it so FTs have like faster mobilization speed for Allies but they'd have to update doctrine balancing. Comintern would be weaker with no spammable capability, Axis would actually have an advantage, since its the same cost to deploy 1 FT, regardless of doctrine (if doctrine differences were implemented, I mean), so Axis FTs would be significantly better than Comintern FTs. Pan-Asian FTs only suffer from reduced HP ig, so it doesn't really change much for that doctrine.Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:
Of course. We now just have to wait for Flame Tank doctrine variants.
With the possible exception of Nazi Germany, whom I can't recall off the top of my head, every military represented had marines._Pyth0n_ wrote:
Ye a buncha units IRL were only used by one side. I think a buncha Pan-Asian tech was either experimental or barely used in the actual war but are represented as functioning units in CoW. Same theory should apply to marines.Carking the 6th wrote:
Axis ones invaded Norway though, I think they are important. Sure Soviets didn’t, but still, it’s alt history lol.
The Japanese had the IJN Special Landing Forces, who participated in the Battle of Shanghai among other campaigns.
The US had the US Marines and the British had the Royal Marines ... no comment needed.
The Soviets did indeed have Marine Infantry, and in fact that picture the World Herald uses (This one) is of Soviet Naval Infantry raising the flag after capturing Port Arthur from the Japanese in 1945.
An arms race is important for a war obviously.
Mb mb didn't know, but if in the case there wasn't a certain IRL representation of any units, then CoW shud take the liberty and use some experimental tech or something to fill that void.Lord Crayfish wrote:
With the possible exception of Nazi Germany, whom I can't recall off the top of my head, every military represented had marines.The Japanese had the IJN Special Landing Forces, who participated in the Battle of Shanghai among other campaigns._Pyth0n_ wrote:
Ye a buncha units IRL were only used by one side. I think a buncha Pan-Asian tech was either experimental or barely used in the actual war but are represented as functioning units in CoW. Same theory should apply to marines.Carking the 6th wrote:
Axis ones invaded Norway though, I think they are important. Sure Soviets didn’t, but still, it’s alt history lol.The US had the US Marines and the British had the Royal Marines ... no comment needed.
The Soviets did indeed have Marine Infantry, and in fact that picture the World Herald uses (This one) is of Soviet Naval Infantry raising the flag after capturing Port Arthur from the Japanese in 1945.
So the newspaper still has the same pics from 3 year ago. wowLord Crayfish wrote:
With the possible exception of Nazi Germany, whom I can't recall off the top of my head, every military represented had marines.The Japanese had the IJN Special Landing Forces, who participated in the Battle of Shanghai among other campaigns._Pyth0n_ wrote:
Ye a buncha units IRL were only used by one side. I think a buncha Pan-Asian tech was either experimental or barely used in the actual war but are represented as functioning units in CoW. Same theory should apply to marines.Carking the 6th wrote:
Axis ones invaded Norway though, I think they are important. Sure Soviets didn’t, but still, it’s alt history lol.The US had the US Marines and the British had the Royal Marines ... no comment needed.
The Soviets did indeed have Marine Infantry, and in fact that picture the World Herald uses (This one) is of Soviet Naval Infantry raising the flag after capturing Port Arthur from the Japanese in 1945.
a lvl 2 flame tank can see my lvl 3 militia? i might retire after this round.... i cant keep up
It can what? No it can’t!-VIP- wrote:
a lvl 2 flame tank can see my lvl 3 militia? i might retire after this round.... i cant keep up
looked like it, it was the only thing there.
but idontknow, dont listen to me, i have no idea what im talking about, i only sleep here...
Aww poor little Monke should get some sleep…-VIP- wrote:
looked like it, it was the only thing there.but idontknow, dont listen to me, i have no idea what im talking about, i only sleep here...
yes, ill take a sleep. and i wont make a deal about it ether like sam did
going agenst 5 lvl 2 flame tanks now is a bad time for the empire.
that along with some peoples gold use i cant keep up and it aint fun anymore
All you can do is survive… it could be worse.
Survive what?
Please log in to post a reply.