Attention, General!
With this update several minor map issues have been fixed, including spelling mistakes, connection issues and missing landmasses.
On the combat front, we addressed an issue where armies could halt their attack ticks in the midst of melee combat, leading to unfair advantages. Now all armies will diligently follow their assigned attack command.
Last but not least, some inconsistencies in the user interface were adjusted, such as image alignments or overflowing elements.
For a closer look at the changes please check out the detailed Release Notes and share your feedback with us right here on the Forums and on our Discord Server.
Best of luck General!
Your Bytro Team
Please log in to post a reply.
Nice! I see you updated the loading screen as well, nice job bytro!
Missing landmasses? whats this about?
The new loading screen is fire! Love it.
What did they do to it... I cant see anything new.The Mister Class wrote:
The new loading screen is fire! Love it.
it was changed in pcnoblebright wrote:
What did they do to it... I cant see anything new.The Mister Class wrote:
The new loading screen is fire! Love it.
Ik but what did they change?The Mister Class wrote:
it was changed in pcnoblebright wrote:
What did they do to it... I cant see anything new.The Mister Class wrote:
The new loading screen is fire! Love it.
Aesthetics.
They need Nuke art.
Yes. Yes, they do.
They could do with more art from the Far East TheatreCarking the 6th wrote:
They need Nuke art.
Spitfires and El Alamein and Stalingrad is great already but some pictures of the Coral Sea or jungle fighting in Burma or stuff would be pretty cool too
Pacific Theatre in WW2? Nah, wasn’t real. Japan just declared war on America, had a few ship battles, and then got nuked into surrender! Millions of Chinese? Never heard of them.
I wasn't actually thinking of China, but yeah maybe that too
But that said I'm glad they brought back the loading screen art
China was basically the main front the Pacific war for most of its duration, would make sense.
I thought it was the island-hopping campaign or the Pacific war.Carking the 6th wrote:
China was basically the main front the Pacific war for most of its duration, would make sense.
1937-1942 before that, with 20 million dead Chinese with 400k-750k dead Japanese. That’s larger than the 4 years against the US, which means most of Japan’s involvement in WW2 was against China, even if you consider the Pacific more important.
make a dunkirk or dresden one! (does that already exist?)
I don’t think either do, but I’d like to focus on other fronts, we already have lots of Germany and British stuff.
I'm going to focus on the fronts.Carking the 6th wrote:
I don’t think either do, but I’d like to focus on other fronts, we already have lots of Germany and British stuff.
Carking the 6th wrote:
China was basically the main front the Pacific war for most of its duration, would make sense.
The US high command distinguished between the China-Burma-India Theatre and the Pacific Theatre, which I think makes sense. There's a case to be made anyway. It's like lumping the Western and Eastern European, and North African Fronts together. They're connected but different.NEPTUNE the great wrote:
I thought it was the island-hopping campaign or the Pacific war.
I was thinking more in the Realm of European and Asia-Pacific Fronts. I see the European and Pacific Theatre lumped into one thing all the time. This is all a matter of semantics though.Lord Crayfish wrote:
Carking the 6th wrote:
China was basically the main front the Pacific war for most of its duration, would make sense.The US high command distinguished between the China-Burma-India Theatre and the Pacific Theatre, which I think makes sense. There's a case to be made anyway. It's like lumping the Western and Eastern European, and North African Fronts together. They're connected but different.NEPTUNE the great wrote:
I thought it was the island-hopping campaign or the Pacific war.
Please log in to post a reply.
