GeneralAumSum wrote:
I wish we had a modern world map
It’s called Conflict of Nations.
22 Jun 2020, 16:50
„Rush for Europe” event postponed!
Attention, Generals!
We noticed an issue with our “Rush for Europe” event that is preventing players from joining several game rounds. Instead of opening the country chooser, a message is displayed informing the player that the map is already full, although this is not the case. This prevents several maps from starting right now.
We decided to postpone the event until this problem is resolved.
- Event rounds that already started are not affected, and players in those rounds will be able to continue to play.
- Players currently waiting for their game round to start, unfortunately will not be able to play the event this weekend. These games will shortly disappear from your “My Games” section.
Your Bytro Team
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
52 Replies
22 Jun 2020, 16:52
I can't play it because I'm on mobileDoctorDR1 wrote:
It’s called Conflict of Nations.GeneralAumSum wrote:
I wish we had a modern world map
22 Jun 2020, 16:53
I use mobile. I just opened a new game.
22 Jun 2020, 16:56
He means you can’t play CoN on mobile.DoctorDR1 wrote:
I use mobile. I just opened a new game.
22 Jun 2020, 18:22
I know. I meant CoN too.
23 Jun 2020, 16:10
guess we wont have Mediterranean this time 
its arms race
23 Jun 2020, 18:46
RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:RiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etc
U want a collision win, its easier. But still hard
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.
My country fell in like a day.
hi
23 Jun 2020, 18:47
People backstab in all sorts of events, it might just have been bad luck.Nn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0U want a collision win, its easier. But still hard
23 Jun 2020, 18:48
RiverWolf74 wrote:
People backstab in all sorts of events, it might just have been bad luck.Nn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0U want a collision win, its easier. But still hard
I had 3 backstabs and 3 undeclared wars (not by the backstabbers) ON THE SAME SAD DAY!
hi
23 Jun 2020, 18:57
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0U want a collision win, its easier. But still hard
My country fell in like a day.
23 Jun 2020, 19:02
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0U want a collision win, its easier. But still hard
hi
23 Jun 2020, 21:18
u should have had allies which would have blocked them. Like japan. I took papua new Guinea many times and got 2nd place. All my allies where Australia and I took care of the islandsNn gg wrote:
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcU want a collision win, its easier. But still hardRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0
23 Jun 2020, 21:43
GET SOME NAVY!!! The whole point fo the map is naval combat...if you had navy then the Asian countries wouldn’t have been able to attack you. If you don’t like navy try a land-locked nation, like north India, Texas, or Kansas.Nn gg wrote:
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcU want a collision win, its easier. But still hardRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0
24 Jun 2020, 01:54
didn’t even have a submarineRiverWolf74 wrote:
GET SOME NAVY!!! The whole point fo the map is naval combat...if you had navy then the Asian countries wouldn’t have been able to attack you. If you don’t like navy try a land-locked nation, like north India, Texas, or Kansas.Nn gg wrote:
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcU want a collision win, its easier. But still hardRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0
hi
24 Jun 2020, 10:38
That’s why you need navy in pacific conquest if you have a border with the ocean.Nn gg wrote:
didn’t even have a submarineRiverWolf74 wrote:
GET SOME NAVY!!! The whole point fo the map is naval combat...if you had navy then the Asian countries wouldn’t have been able to attack you. If you don’t like navy try a land-locked nation, like north India, Texas, or Kansas.Nn gg wrote:
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcU want a collision win, its easier. But still hardRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0
24 Jun 2020, 13:08
Papua New Guinea gets a lot of mac easily. And it’s in a good geographical locationRiverWolf74 wrote:
That’s why you need navy in pacific conquest if you have a border with the ocean.Nn gg wrote:
didn’t even have a submarineRiverWolf74 wrote:
GET SOME NAVY!!! The whole point fo the map is naval combat...if you had navy then the Asian countries wouldn’t have been able to attack you. If you don’t like navy try a land-locked nation, like north India, Texas, or Kansas.Nn gg wrote:
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcU want a collision win, its easier. But still hardRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0
24 Jun 2020, 14:33
My favourite nations in pacific conquest are Texas and Kansas, so you don't need to worry about a naval invasion early in the game. And they have excellent resource production. Texas only has 2 player neighbours (North Mexico and New Mexico) and Kansas only has 1 playable neighbour (Colorado) so you don't have to fear an invasion early in the game.GeneralAumSum wrote:
Papua New Guinea gets a lot of mac easily. And it’s in a good geographical locationRiverWolf74 wrote:
That’s why you need navy in pacific conquest if you have a border with the ocean.Nn gg wrote:
didn’t even have a submarineRiverWolf74 wrote:
GET SOME NAVY!!! The whole point fo the map is naval combat...if you had navy then the Asian countries wouldn’t have been able to attack you. If you don’t like navy try a land-locked nation, like north India, Texas, or Kansas.Nn gg wrote:
I took British Columbia if I remember correctly, somehow Tibet came over the sea and trashed me in the face. Nationalist China and communist China also trashed meGeneralAumSum wrote:
that always happens when u play a bad country. Play a good country like new Zealand. The best one for me is Papua new Guinea. I had tons of allies and only 1 backstabber when I played as Papua new Guinea. U see everyone wants to get the bad countries as they are easier to conquer and give lots of land when combinedNn gg wrote:
Please don’t remind me of pacific conquest... had loads of bad memories there... loads of backstabbing and undeclared wars.My country fell in like a day.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Then try tutorial pacific conquest they are always funNn gg wrote:
dude, I’ve tried before, not fun at all.It’s a 100 player game, so it’s technically:If u want a solo win:You vs 1 player vs 1 player vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 etcU want a collision win, its easier. But still hardRiverWolf74 wrote:
Try joining world at war they are much larger and longerNn gg wrote:
well, I’m starting to get tired of clash of nations, in 1.5 and 1.0
24 Jun 2020, 16:16
Papua New Guinea Is an island. Islands have good protection if there is navy guarding them. I always choose Papua New Guinea in PC.
24 Jun 2020, 16:27
well, u have luck then, I always get the trash countries (America)GeneralAumSum wrote:
Papua New Guinea Is an island. Islands have good protection if there is navy guarding them. I always choose Papua New Guinea in PC.
hi
24 Jun 2020, 16:44
I have played 5 Pacific games and all of them where Papua New GuineaNn gg wrote:
well, u have luck then, I always get the trash countries (America)GeneralAumSum wrote:
Papua New Guinea Is an island. Islands have good protection if there is navy guarding them. I always choose Papua New Guinea in PC.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
