Something's in the air tonight

16 Sept 2015, 13:03

Generals,

our research teams have been making quite some progress: the second new weapon system has also been uncovered. The Self-propelled Anti Air might turn out to be a crucial point in your strategic outline! These units offer:

They belong to the “hard” armor class.
They move with high speed.
In order to keep a good balance, they have decreased defense and attack values.

The Headquarter has also been working on improvements, the following issues have been cleared:

The forum stability has been increased to assure uninterrupted availability.
Every Anti Air ground unit in patrol range of an Aircraft will now cause full damage instead of the previous down scaled damage.

After thorough considerations and evaluation of your feedback, we have been tipping the scale of balance once more. Some units, like the Cruiser, have been undergoing a slight redefinition to raise their attractiveness. The Submarine on the other was perceived as too strong by the community, which made us review this unit as well. The following adjustments have been done to improve your gaming experience:

The oil costs for Tactical Bombers have been increased.
For Naval Bombers, the oil costs have been lowered.
The oil costs for most naval units have been increased.
Submarine damage has been lowered a bit.
The Anti Air capabilities of Cruisers have been heavily increased.
The Anti Air capabilities of Battleships have been lowered.
Convoyed units now have a bit of Submarine defense
The Submarine defense of Battleships has been slightly increased.
The damage of Strategic Bombers against ground units & buildings has been slightly increased.
The range of Strategic Bombers has been increased by 10%.
Naval bombers now have a bigger radius which they can uncover.
Decreased Anti Air values of Infantry,Militia, Mot. Infantry and Mech. Infantry.
The manpower costs of Ships have been lowered.
The manpower costs of Planes have been raised.
Self-propelled Artillery has now an increased range.

A comprehensive list will be posted in the forums.

The Call of War HQ

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

87 Replies

19 Sept 2015, 20:18

Maybe he means the Koran?

The past is a foreign country.

19 Sept 2015, 20:20

Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Pz.Korpz wrote:
Muslim books
You mean Arabic, right? Muslim isn't a language.

Actually I was saying I also read the qu'ran as well as The Bible and History books not that Muslim is a language...I have English translated versions as well as German versions of The King James Bible

It is because of men like Stalin,&Hitler , that there is a place called Hell.

19 Sept 2015, 20:22

Pablo22510 wrote:
Maybe he means the Koran?

Written in Arabic. That is why nigh on every Muslim speaks Arabic. So they can read the Koran. There is translations but you must be able to read the original language.

Pz.Korpz wrote:
sending men into space.

This is wrong. They used the V2 rocket tech for space travel. As far as I know, the only rockets Nazi's put people in were the ME 163 and BA 349.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

19 Sept 2015, 20:23

Pz.Korpz wrote:
Actually I was saying I also read the qu'ran

Ah, okay. i thought you were on about books written in Arabic, not the Koran.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

19 Sept 2015, 20:23

Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Written in Arabic.

I know everything of what you said, but I said it's a 'Muslim' book because it's of Islam.

The past is a foreign country.

19 Sept 2015, 20:25

No I can't read arabic only English and German and trying to learn Spanish now...

It is because of men like Stalin,&Hitler , that there is a place called Hell.

19 Sept 2015, 20:28

Pz.Korpz wrote:
trying to learn Spanish now...

Lol, I could teach you

The past is a foreign country.

19 Sept 2015, 20:28

Pz.Korpz wrote:
learn Spanish now

Same. Do you know that burrito means little donkey? I love that word, burrito. A burro is a donkey if I remember correctly.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

19 Sept 2015, 20:30

Correct!

The past is a foreign country.

19 Sept 2015, 20:35

This thread is hilarious.

By "you must not like reading", I meant that you didn't even read the second part of my post.

19 Sept 2015, 20:36

Sí.

Yes.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

19 Sept 2015, 20:39

salbalkus wrote:
I meant that you didn't even read the second part of my post.

Then why didnt you say that instead?

Check out these Video Tutorial Guides! CLICK HERE
Check out these Video Tutorial Guides! CLICK HERE

19 Sept 2015, 20:40

Sir McSquiggles wrote:
salbalkus wrote:
I meant that you didn't even read the second part of my post.
Then why didnt you say that instead?

Cause I like being a sarcastic #$%&

20 Sept 2015, 20:29

I don't get why people say rockets aren't realistic of this timeline. I'm pretty sure I read that hundreds to thousands of V2 rockets were launched by Germany as revenge for the strategic bombings

"A knight cannot save the world. They call certain methods of fighting good and others evil, acting as if there were some nobility to the battlefield."
"Honor? Glory? There's no point in speaking to a killer who indulges in such nonsense."
"It's a crime we call victory, paid for by the pain of the defeated"

20 Sept 2015, 20:34

Probably because people are silly sausages.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

20 Sept 2015, 20:40

v1 rockets:

"At its peak, more than one hundred V-1s a day were fired at south-east England, 9,521 in total, decreasing in number as sites were overrun until October 1944, when the last V-1 site in range of Britain was overrun by Allied forces. After this, the V-1s were directed at the port of Antwerp and other targets in Belgium, with 2,448 V-1s being launched. The attacks stopped when the last launch site was overrun on 29 March 1945"

v2 rockets:

"Beginning in September 1944, over 3,000 V-2s were launched by the German Wehrmacht against Allied targets during the war, firstly London and later Antwerp and Liège."

20 Sept 2015, 22:54

Yes, in my book on World War II by DK:

" Three types of V-Bombs (revenge weapons) were used during World War Two. The V-1 flying bomb, the V-2 rocket, and the V-3 long-range, of which only 2 were created and used (referring to the V-3).

Development work on the V-1 and V-2 was centred in the Peedmunde on Germany's Baltic coast. It was subjected to heavy bombing by the RAF in early 1943, putting back the development program. The V-1 had a preset guidance system and a maximum range of 125 miles (200 km). It flew at a top speed of 250 mph (620 kph) and had a 1,875-lb (850-kg) warhead. The Germans launched their first V-1 offensive against Britain on June 13th, 1944. Initially it was successful causing many to evacuate London. The British then installed antiaircraft guns along the south coast and these, combined with fighters, meant that fewer rockets got through. The Allies also overran the V-1 launch sites in France following the invasion of Normandy in June 1944. A longer-range version was then developed to be launched from the Netherlands, but many continued to be shot down.

By this time the V-2 was in service. This was a very fast and different proposition to the V-1. Flying at speeds of 2,500 mph (4,000 kph), it could not be shot down. It also included a mobile launcher, which could withdraw from the site of the launch within 30 minutes of firing. The first two V-2s were fired at London and Paris on September 8th. A steady stream were then fired from the Netherlands, the final rockets being launched at London on March 28th, 1945."

20 Sept 2015, 23:18

Let's keep those posts for when Hoffman plucks his head up from his nitpick den

20 Sept 2015, 23:25

aDudeWhoDoesThings wrote:
Hoffman plucks his head up from his nitpick den

Yes, lets. Let's hope no one else decides to pull a Hofmann(note the spelling difference)

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!