Dear Generals,
the circumstances of war sometimes demand forming an alliance to face the enemy together. From now on it is possible to unite with your allies in a coalition. For the time of one game round you can raise your own flag and use the coalition chat to discuss plans. In the top left-hand corner you can find the button for creating a coalition.
Furthermore, you now have the option to support your allies by speeding up their production of buildings or raising morale of their troops and provinces. This new Gold feature was enabled thanks to your feedback and is independent of coalitions.
We hope you like the new features. Let us know your opinion in the forum!
Your Call of War Team
Please log in to post a reply.
"Not being able to win as a coalition eliminates the purpose of having one in the first place."
It's my understanding coalitions were created, primarily, in response to the overwhelming request for a private chat among allies.
If a coalition of 3 members hasn't defeated all other active players (so the coalition can retire the game) then it doesn't deserve to win.
If a coalition requires more than 3 members (resulting in the retire option not to be available) then it doesn't deserve to win.
It seems to me that coalitions should be temporary in nature rather than being equal to team warfare. As one coalition dissolves another will be formed. This is part of the diplomacy of the game. Sometimes sides will change as part of competing interests change. They will be most effective in the way they can allow a bloc of smaller nations to protect themselves against a much larger aggressor. It is my opinion that large nations should have no need of (no business, even) coalitions because it can lead to stagnation and games that go on for ever and ever.
if you want to be challenged, join the game with experienced players , something along the lines of the Player's league . and prepare to be beaten if you joinDiktatorius wrote:
Yes, it is for players who is far more experienced than others and seek a little challenge in games.Quasi-duck wrote:
With like, Malta?Diktatorius wrote:
Please make that all players can play with small countries. It would be harder and more fun.
You can find it here, in "finding co-players section
can say that i am in a map, where the coalition i formed we started with 3, but because another coaltion kinda tried to recruit all and those who didnt join were enemies. we ended up being 6 players against over 12. and still fighting those whose left of the other coalition. i would hate to turn against those 5 other players, cause we have been together quite some time now.sivad wrote:
It seems to me that coalitions should be temporary in nature rather than being equal to team warfare. As one coalition dissolves another will be formed. This is part of the diplomacy of the game. Sometimes sides will change as part of competing interests change. They will be most effective in the way they can allow a bloc of smaller nations to protect themselves against a much larger aggressor. It is my opinion that large nations should have no need of (no business, even) coalitions because it can lead to stagnation and games that go on for ever and ever.
would say that we are quite equal when coming to armies and land so there i would have seen it nice if we were able to win the map, if we just got rid of the last players/the other coalition. since it us or them.
Have them give their provinces with VP to the person with the most and youll end the game. 
easier said than done if it is a 100 map one is playingSir McSquiggles wrote:
Have them give their provinces with VP to the person with the most and youll end the game.
what if a coalition would need 80% of points to win. Thus coalition members wouldn't have to fight each other.
would rather say that if a coalition should be able to win they should get atleast 90% or everything. but as long as it is possible
Please log in to post a reply.
