War Bonds - New Resource

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Eich Pfennig wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

also in your example, before wb non paying players would probably spend 5k gold MAX per round. compare that to the 10k gold the other guy bought and its a 1/20 ratio.

that means for every 1 gold non paying players used, your average golder would have 20.

with wb non paying players get 300k while golders get 800k, thats a 3/8 ratio or 1/2.666....

so, for every 1 gold for non-payers, golders have less than 3...

so tell me now which one is more fair?

THAT’S NOT HOW YOU COMPARE THEM YOU DUMBASS!!!If a free player uses their 300,000 war bonds, the golder will be able to use 300,000 of their war bonds to counter the free player’s actions, then they’ll still have 500,000 gold left to use on whatever.

NOT. FAIR.

bro just chill out omgi never said they were equal, i just said they have a better chance. notice now the golder has to spend more gold to have the advantage

Taffyta, I now understand why you lose so often and keep blaming golders.^{I now also understand why you think wbs make it better for you.}

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

^{Not why wbs are not solving your problem.}

^{The reason is ... you.}

^{You and your flawed reasoning, your flawed calculations, your... well, actually your flawed everything when it comes to understanding this game.}

Golders were and are not a problem.

Only extremely heavy golders.

What you fail to understand:

WBs do not level the playing field.

WBs now introduced mana magic into every game round.

WBs and their magic reduce the strategy aspect.

WBs obscure even extreme gold use.

Ergo: wbs increased your problem.

WBs simply do not help mediocre players at all. The funny thing is that one has to be a mediocre player to not understand that

good luck Von,

War Bonds are out of control.

-VIP- wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Eich Pfennig wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

also in your example, before wb non paying players would probably spend 5k gold MAX per round. compare that to the 10k gold the other guy bought and its a 1/20 ratio.

that means for every 1 gold non paying players used, your average golder would have 20.

with wb non paying players get 300k while golders get 800k, thats a 3/8 ratio or 1/2.666....

so, for every 1 gold for non-payers, golders have less than 3...

so tell me now which one is more fair?

THAT’S NOT HOW YOU COMPARE THEM YOU DUMBASS!!!If a free player uses their 300,000 war bonds, the golder will be able to use 300,000 of their war bonds to counter the free player’s actions, then they’ll still have 500,000 gold left to use on whatever.NOT. FAIR.

bro just chill out omgi never said they were equal, i just said they have a better chance. notice now the golder has to spend more gold to have the advantage

Taffyta, I now understand why you lose so often and keep blaming golders.^{I now also understand why you think wbs make it better for you.}

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

^{Not why wbs are not solving your problem.}

^{The reason is ... you.}

^{You and your flawed reasoning, your flawed calculations, your... well, actually your flawed everything when it comes to understanding this game.}

Golders were and are not a problem.

Only extremely heavy golders.

What you fail to understand:

WBs do not level the playing field.

WBs now introduced mana magic into every game round.

WBs and their magic reduce the strategy aspect.

WBs obscure even extreme gold use.

Ergo: wbs increased your problem.

WBs simply do not help mediocre players at all. The funny thing is that one has to be a mediocre player to not understand that

i do agree the strategic aspect has taken a turn or the worst and that War Bonds mask the players that used to be obvious gold users, buuut i KNOW you aint talking to Taffyta, The Master of Submarines, Romanian Princess, Technician Third Grade certified. Once seen her take out a whole platoon with one click of a button.. was a bloodbath, used to be known as 'Iron Muttonfudge' for there is no real way to defeat her in war.

good luck Von,

first that nazi guy and now him?

but my point still stands

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

^{Not why wbs are not solving your problem.}

^{The reason is ... you.}

^{You and your flawed reasoning, your flawed calculations, your... well, actually your flawed everything when it comes to understanding this game.}

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

What you fail to understand:

WBs do not level the playing field.

WBs now introduced mana magic into every game round.

WBs and their magic reduce the strategy aspect.

WBs obscure even extreme gold use.

and if you think theres no strategy with war bonds, your deluded.

“introduce magic into game” surely gold existed for the last 8 years?!?!?

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

WBs simply do not help mediocre players at all. The funny thing is that one has to be a mediocre player to not understand that

now: non spenders can use gold actions

so, wb do benefit non spenders. the funny thing is that i had enough braincells to figure that out

-VIP- wrote:

Once seen her take out a whole platoon with one click of a button.. was a bloodbath, used to be known as 'Iron Muttonfudge' for there is no real way to defeat her in war.

Yeah Taff! Give it to 'em!

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Eich Pfennig wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

also in your example, before wb non paying players would probably spend 5k gold MAX per round. compare that to the 10k gold the other guy bought and its a 1/20 ratio.

that means for every 1 gold non paying players used, your average golder would have 20.

with wb non paying players get 300k while golders get 800k, thats a 3/8 ratio or 1/2.666....

so, for every 1 gold for non-payers, golders have less than 3...

so tell me now which one is more fair?

THAT’S NOT HOW YOU COMPARE THEM YOU DUMBASS!!!If a free player uses their 300,000 war bonds, the golder will be able to use 300,000 of their war bonds to counter the free player’s actions, then they’ll still have 500,000 gold left to use on whatever.

NOT. FAIR.

bro just chill out omgi never said they were equal, i just said they have a better chance. notice now the golder has to spend more gold to have the advantage

Taffyta, I now understand why you lose so often and keep blaming golders.^{I now also understand why you think wbs make it better for you.}

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

^{Not why wbs are not solving your problem.}

^{The reason is ... you.}

^{You and your flawed reasoning, your flawed calculations, your... well, actually your flawed everything when it comes to understanding this game.}

Golders were and are not a problem.

Only extremely heavy golders.

What you fail to understand:

WBs do not level the playing field.

WBs now introduced mana magic into every game round.

WBs and their magic reduce the strategy aspect.

WBs obscure even extreme gold use.

Ergo: wbs increased your problem.

WBs simply do not help mediocre players at all. The funny thing is that one has to be a mediocre player to not understand that

That has happened to me on the regular.

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

lets hop into a waw and i will prove otherwise

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

^{You simply do not get it.}

^{Not how to play well in general.}

^{Not why wbs are not solving your problem.}

^{The reason is ... you.}

^{You and your flawed reasoning, your flawed calculations, your... well, actually your flawed everything when it comes to understanding this game.}

so player with 16 human k/d doesnt understand game?? okay.

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

What you fail to understand:

WBs do not level the playing field.

WBs now introduced mana magic into every game round.

WBs and their magic reduce the strategy aspect.

WBs obscure even extreme gold use.

never disputed any of those points lol

and if you think theres no strategy with war bonds, your deluded.

“introduce magic into game” surely gold existed for the last 8 years?!?!?

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

WBs simply do not help mediocre players at all. The funny thing is that one has to be a mediocre player to not understand that

before: non spenders cant use gold actionsnow: non spenders can use gold actions

so, wb do benefit non spenders. the funny thing is that i had enough braincells to figure that out

Obviously.

Only golders think that only heavy golders are problematic. For a free player every golder is problematic.

The other point i want to say is that nobody who knows the game cares about k/d, you get it easily if you want it, just spend gold and make overpowered armies. But keep on bragging if you want to make a fool out of yourself.

The War Bonds i get are helping me but since everyone gets the same and subscribers get double the end result is negative. I'm on the edge of quitting, that's why i'm so salty.

Wait what?

Komrade Khrushchev wrote:

croatian kid wrote:

i hope they increase amount of war bonds or give more ways to get them. i love giving golders there own medicine!

Love that too. Save 'em up, and spend 'em late!

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Eich Pfennig wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

I once got attacked by someone who had 200K GOLD (during the pre-WB era)

I have fought players willing to spend well over € 1000 to beat me. Someone spending 200k gold can hardly be called a heavy golder.

Torspo2 wrote:

Only golders think that only heavy golders are problematic. For a free player every golder is problematic.

The other point i want to say is that nobody who knows the game cares about k/d, you get it easily if you want it, just spend gold and make overpowered armies. But keep on bragging if you want to make a fool out of yourself.

The War Bonds i get are helping me but since everyone gets the same and subscribers get double the end result is negative. I'm on the edge of quitting, that's why i'm so salty.

First off: heavy golders are just a few

2ndly: average golders can be fought as described before

3rdly: k/d has nothing to do with gold if you know what you are doing

4th: OP armies can also be build without gold, but no army is OP with or without gold when you have no skill nor game knowledge.

I am basically still a halfwit, but killed plenty of skillless golders, even without premium

never had over 20k at once in 2.5 year playing , till now cuz there is nothing to spend it on anymore.

i think you are talking about the mobile users that got free gold evryday, like some sally's...

thats not the average person, thats just being bloated from advertising

-VIP- wrote:

never had over 20k at once in 2.5 year playing , till now cuz there is nothing to spend it on anymore.

i think you are talking about the mobile users that got free gold evryday, like some sally's...

thats not the average person, thats just being bloated from advertising

i have 36,000 golds

bosna best wrote:

I don’t think they help that much because I joined a game where a golder bought 280,000 war bonds and spammed them.

-VIP- wrote:

never had over 20k at once in 2.5 year playing , till now cuz there is nothing to spend it on anymore.

i think you are talking about the mobile users that got free gold evryday, like some sally's...

thats not the average person, thats just being bloated from advertising

So evidently WarBonds are allowing you to save up a stash of gold by giving you access the the convenience items you were using gold on previously.

Now, when you meet a player buying & using gold , you will have more gold to use against them if you choose to.

In other words: Its working exactly as its intended.