Best General of WW2?

So saw who was the best army thread etc and think well for an army to be effective they need a good leader for their units...

So in your opinion and why, who was the best General of WW2 (includes & Feldmarschals)

Personally: Konstantin Rokossovsky

Why: This guy played a major role in nearly all of the Soviet Offences and Defences on the Eastern front from Moskva, Stalingrad, Kursk, Smolensk and Warszaw this guy general had the technical ability to stop and attack the germans.

He had the bravery to tell Stalin what had to be done to get the victory and in all occasions he was correct and Stalin called him a saviour. Apart from that the Polish General was a massive conductor for the Soviet Armies and won countless battles and massively outthinked his German Counterparts


Джаред Михайлович Ніколюк 9

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

129 Replies

oceanhawk wrote:

The wehrmacht didnt ...
You do know that the Wehrmacht is all German forces, right? Besides, they totally did. Standard operating procedure in USSR was, by the Germans, to kill any Russian officers.

oceanhawk wrote:

Seem the soviets when through a lot of work to get them...
POW's? Yeah, the Germans do retreat pretty fast so it is hard to catch the,.

oceanhawk wrote:

how come paying back the USA was so hard for the soviets?
It wasn't.....

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

The wehrmacht didnt ...
You do know that the Wehrmacht is all German forces, right? Besides, they totally did. Standard operating procedure in USSR was, by the Germans, to kill any Russian officers.

oceanhawk wrote:

Seem the soviets when through a lot of work to get them...
POW's? Yeah, the Germans do retreat pretty fast so it is hard to catch the,.

oceanhawk wrote:

how come paying back the USA was so hard for the soviets?
It wasn't.....
Ugghh.. you no very little on German armed forces...

wehrmacht is the Heer.. kreigemarine and Luftwaffe

The SS is not part of the wehrmacht

Put it in Bold to help...

No the scientists...

No you said that the soviets were in the mess because of them needing to pay the Americans...

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Soviet union was there in 1950 cos of the USA..
The USSR had Italy join them? Hm, I didn't know that.

oceanhawk wrote:

must be some ambushes if the Germans lost 450k soldiers

and the allies lost of 300k men..

Yeah, I agree with you, the German army was doggone awful.

oceanhawk wrote:

Soviet union isnt here today cos of the Soviet union
Yeah, if they hadn't spent most of their literal gold faithfully and gratefully paying back the US and British for the Lend-Lease program like they promised, they wouldn't have been in that mess. Talk about loyal to a fault!

This better be good..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

The wehrmacht didnt ...
You do know that the Wehrmacht is all German forces, right? Besides, they totally did. Standard operating procedure in USSR was, by the Germans, to kill any Russian officers.

oceanhawk wrote:

Seem the soviets when through a lot of work to get them...
POW's? Yeah, the Germans do retreat pretty fast so it is hard to catch the,.

oceanhawk wrote:

how come paying back the USA was so hard for the soviets?
It wasn't.....
Ugghh.. you no very little on German armed forces...

wehrmacht is the Heer.. kreigemarine and Luftwaffe

The SS is not part of the wehrmacht

Put it in Bold to help...

No the scientists...

No you said that the soviets were in the mess because of them needing to pay the Americans...

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Soviet union was there in 1950 cos of the USA..
The USSR had Italy join them? Hm, I didn't know that.

oceanhawk wrote:

must be some ambushes if the Germans lost 450k soldiers

and the allies lost of 300k men..

Yeah, I agree with you, the German army was doggone awful.

oceanhawk wrote:

Soviet union isnt here today cos of the Soviet union
Yeah, if they hadn't spent most of their literal gold faithfully and gratefully paying back the US and British for the Lend-Lease program like they promised, they wouldn't have been in that mess. Talk about loyal to a fault!
This better be good..
Haha you are such a silly fellow.

[spoiler]

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

The wehrmacht didnt ...
You do know that the Wehrmacht is all German forces, right? Besides, they totally did. Standard operating procedure in USSR was, by the Germans, to kill any Russian officers.

oceanhawk wrote:

Seem the soviets when through a lot of work to get them...
POW's? Yeah, the Germans do retreat pretty fast so it is hard to catch the,.

oceanhawk wrote:

how come paying back the USA was so hard for the soviets?
It wasn't.....
Ugghh.. you no very little on German armed forces...wehrmacht is the Heer.. kreigemarine and Luftwaffe

The SS is not part of the wehrmacht

Put it in Bold to help...

No the scientists...

No you said that the soviets were in the mess because of them needing to pay the Americans...

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Soviet union was there in 1950 cos of the USA..
The USSR had Italy join them? Hm, I didn't know that.

oceanhawk wrote:

must be some ambushes if the Germans lost 450k soldiers

and the allies lost of 300k men..

Yeah, I agree with you, the German army was doggone awful.

oceanhawk wrote:

Soviet union isnt here today cos of the Soviet union
Yeah, if they hadn't spent most of their literal gold faithfully and gratefully paying back the US and British for the Lend-Lease program like they promised, they wouldn't have been in that mess. Talk about loyal to a fault!
This better be good..v
Haha you are such a silly fellow.

do you not have a response for being proven wrong?


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

do you not have a response for being proven wrong?
I wasn't.

You really do not know much do you?

Americans - Slaughtering Civilians and Soldiers of the German army were killed in late 1944 and early 1944.

Soviet Union - Raped and massacred thousands of Poles, Ukrainians, Germans and other central european civilians...

Only country which can show honour for its fighting is the British...

Other than that CIVLIANS DIE IN WAR get over it.


Джаред Михайлович Ніколюк 9

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

do you not have a response for being proven wrong?
I wasn't.
yes you were.. you said the SS Was part of the wehrmarkt

which it is not...


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

wehrmarkt
I never said that the SS was part of a market.....

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

wehrmarkt
I never said that the SS was part of a market.....
Dont think I said you did.. but I wouldnt be surprised if you did think that...

you said the SS was part of the wehrmacht


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

you said the SS was part of the wehrmacht
And you said they were part of a market.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

you said the SS was part of the wehrmacht
And you said they were part of a market.
can you pls give me some evidence...

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

can you pls give me some evidence...
Look back, you said the wehrmarkt (German shopping chain, I don't know?) and I quoted it too.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

can you pls give me some evidence...
Look back, you said the wehrmarkt (German shopping chain, I don't know?) and I quoted it too
nah.. show me the evidence..

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

nah.. show me the evidence..
Look back. I have better things to do like, I dunno, hang around bookies or shopping centers.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

nah.. show me the evidence..
Look back. I have better things to do like, I dunno, hang around bookies or shopping centers.
yea... no didnt see it..

maybe you mistake the wehrmacht for something else?

thats the German armed forces.. (doesnt include SS)


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

yea... no didnt see it..
Probably changed it.

Anyways, you're wrong, but you refuse to accept it, so I will do, uh, nothing? I dunno. At least this was a good point racket @Maximilien

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

yea... no didnt see it..
Probably changed it.

Anyways, you're wrong, but you refuse to accept it, so I will do, uh, nothing? I dunno. At least this was a good point racket @Maximilien

I dont know what your on about

you think the wehrmacht is a shopping center?


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

you think the wehrmacht is a shopping center?
Look back.......

Quasi-duck wrote:

Since when is killing POW's and civilians, committing genocide and more honourable?
*cough cough Rommel*
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

*cough cough Rommel*
Ah yes, the German general elevated to heroic status simply because he did not commit war crimes. What a great idol......

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch