Tony Blair, I heard he's up for war crimes.
Best Prime Minister of the UK?
Who do you think is the best PM ever of the UK? I'd say Churchill. I'll add PMs to the poll as people say them.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
115 Replies
Which is interesting. Blair, for war crimes? The world's gone crazy. We're putting our own on trial instead of going for the enemy. Sure, the invasion of Iraq might have had a part in creating ISIS, but noone knew that at the time. That isn't war crimes.Quasi-duck wrote:
Tony Blair, I heard he's up for war crimes.
So, who do you vote for?
Killed 'em all. Anyway, did you not hear of British troops "torturing" people for info? Though as far as I know the torture was hessian sacks on their heads and being shouted at, maybe with duct tape put on them.Pablo22510 wrote:
We're putting our own on trial instead of going for the enemy.
Blair! It's the season of the witch, y'know?Pablo22510 wrote:
So, who do you vote for?
Yeah, well people who feel torture is 'bad' even if we're getting vital info from terrorists should watch the decapitation of John Foley.Quasi-duck wrote:
Killed 'em all. Anyway, did you not hear of British troops "torturing" people for info? Though as far as I know the torture was hessian sacks on their heads and being shouted at, maybe with duct tape put on them.Pablo22510 wrote:
We're putting our own on trial instead of going for the enemy.Blair! It's the season of the witch, y'know?Pablo22510 wrote:
So, who do you vote for?
Ok, Blair added.
They weren't really terrorists quite often, just suspects. I don't think it is as bad as Gitmo though.
Article about the war crimes or whatever. Haven't read it myself.
Don't say that here, you can get banned for that. Click the report button on this post, then read the writing at the bottom.Pablo22510 wrote:
Yeah, I guess. Still in favour of torture, though.
Saying that Blair can't be tried for war crimes. Max, 'misconduct in public office'.Quasi-duck wrote:
Article about the war crimes or whatever. Haven't read it myself.
Lol. Sounds like he groped a secretary or something.Pablo22510 wrote:
Saying that Blair can't be tried for war crimes. Max, 'misconduct in public office'.
I don't believe there should of EVER been western involvement in the middle east, I also believe Bush & Blair had a major part to play on how the middle east is as of now.
Voted for Churchill, Blair is nothing compared to him.
You know you can suggest another PM, right?Not A Communist wrote:
I don't believe there should of EVER been western involvement in the middle east, I also believe Bush & Blair had a major part to play on how the middle east is as of now.Voted for Churchill, Blair is nothing compared to him.
Thatcher, arguable the greatest Conservative leader not just in the UK
Iron lady ate socialists!

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Oh yeah, the wicked witch. Crippled British coal mining.oceanhawk wrote:
Thatcher, arguable the greatest Conservative leader not just in the UKIron lady ate socialists!
Breaking unions, helping the poor. Increasing incomes and winning the warQuasi-duck wrote:
Oh yeah, the wicked witch. Crippled British coal mining.oceanhawk wrote:
Thatcher, arguable the greatest Conservative leader not just in the UKIron lady ate socialists!

(Haha Im a poet and I didnt know it)

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Whatever. She wasn't popular with her own citizens, which ain't good.oceanhawk wrote:
Breaking unions, helping the poor. Increasing incomes and winning the war
That is just a sentence that rhymes. It isn't even in any form.oceanhawk wrote:
(Haha Im a poet and I didnt know it)
Yes well unlike socialists, she did good rather than do bad things that sounded good...Quasi-duck wrote:
Whatever. She wasn't popular with her own citizens, which ain't good.oceanhawk wrote:
Breaking unions, helping the poor. Increasing incomes and winning the warThat is just a sentence that rhymes. It isn't even in any form.oceanhawk wrote:
(Haha Im a poet and I didnt know it)
How are you not getting that quote

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
I'm not going to argue with someone as prejudiced as you and can't tell a poem from a rhyme. Just because it rhymes doesn't mean it is a poem.oceanhawk wrote:
Yes well unlike socialists, she did good rather than do bad things that sounded good...How are you not getting that quote
Okay, yea it aint a poem, but how on earth are you not getting that quote! Read it in a Light funny German accent.. That might help. Maybe a little crazy or lunny to the accent as wellQuasi-duck wrote:
I'm not going to argue with someone as prejudiced as you and can't tell a poem from a rhyme. Just because it rhymes doesn't mean it is a poem.oceanhawk wrote:
Yes well unlike socialists, she did good rather than do bad things that sounded good...How are you not getting that quote
Not gonna argue, cos you aint got an argument 

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Two things:oceanhawk wrote:
Okay, yea it aint a poem, but how on earth are you not getting that quote! Read it in a Light funny German accent.. That might help. Maybe a little crazy or lunny to the accent as wellNot gonna argue, cos you aint got an argument
1. It is just a dumb sentence.
2. There is no such word as "lunny". If you meant "loony", well, that is offensive to people with mental disorders, you bigot.
Goodness gracious, Quasi. Calm down.Quasi-duck wrote:
Two things:oceanhawk wrote:
Okay, yea it aint a poem, but how on earth are you not getting that quote! Read it in a Light funny German accent.. That might help. Maybe a little crazy or lunny to the accent as wellNot gonna argue, cos you aint got an argument
1. It is just a dumb sentence.
2. There is no such word as "lunny". If you meant "loony", well, that is offensive to people with mental disorders, you bigot.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.