Yeah the graphic are annoying...it takes a while to get used to...DoctorDR1 wrote:
I don't really like the CoN graphics. If they made it like CoW, I would like it more.
Call of War vs Conflict of Nations
Which do you like more?Lets vote
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
77 Replies
Let's face it, Supremacy 1914, Call of War, Conflict of Nations, and the weird colonial exploration thing that nobody plays, they are all basically the same game.
You can't make a WW3 game feel more realistic and memorable because no one has any clue what that would actually be like. With WW2 we've got all the facts
Also IMO the game engine we use with the roads / intersections / towns suits mid-20th century warfare more than the other periods. You can't try to simulate asymmetrical warfare in a system that's based on conventional movement.
Whenever feasible, one should always try to eat the rude.
The one time I tried CoN, about 18 months ago, I had Austria. I was asked to select a flag. The three flags I tried were too large and I was not allowed to go further in the game- so I just abandoned the game. I wish they had a flag pre-selected as in CoW as to avoid this problem ... 
I know I can't select a flag either...gusv wrote:
The one time I tried CoN, about 18 months ago, I had Austria. I was asked to select a flag. The three flags I tried were too large and I was not allowed to go further in the game- so I just abandoned the game. I wish they had a flag pre-selected as in CoW as to avoid this problem ...
.I just wait to join someone else coalition. It is quite annoying.
In CoW I completely stopped doing coalitions. It's just too restricting.
I have spent some gold in CoW ... I would not want to join a game (CoN) if I have to spend more than what I already do in CoW ...RiverWolf74 wrote:
And in CoN gold matters a lot...and it can affect the game much more than it does in CoW

RiverWolf74 wrote:
I just tried another game of CoN as Chuktowa (East Russia) in the rising tides map. Itβs actually sorta fun but annexing a city costs a lot! And itβs really hard to get a good amount of units...plus there is always a resource shortage.
Resource shortage confirmed...in modern evolution of Conflict strategy it is seemingly a Naval cost that gets difficult for more adequate market management. Resource shortages are mostly a problem, due to Navy in my opinion, a Naval force in Conflict can be devastating to a formidable defence.
gusv wrote:
The one time I tried CoN, about 18 months ago, I had Austria. I was asked to select a flag. The three flags I tried were too large and I was not allowed to go further in the game- so I just abandoned the game. I wish they had a flag pre-selected as in CoW as to avoid this problem ...
Copy and paste the flag or pic file you want to Paint pro...downsize this to be about the size that you want displayed, usually about %80 - %90 resize...
I might assume that you knew this already so if you are just annoyed about this file transfer then ok... ![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1Qy62Mp4wk
yeah for the flag i just took a screenhot of a tiny white area of my screen and it worked
CoW is better cuz:
1. CoN Graphics is not nice
2. On safari no buttons work once logging
3. Slow reacting(slower than CoW) everything
which Is better? 1914 supremacy, CoW, or CoN?
They are basically the same game with different graphics and units and buildings.
Graphics are bad, but i played CoN on safari and it worked for me. the reacting is slightly slowerNn gg wrote:
CoW is better cuz:1. CoN Graphics is not nice
2. On safari no buttons work once logging
3. Slow reacting(slower than CoW) everything
yes, graphics are bad. On safari, nothing works once I log in.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Graphics are bad, but i played CoN on safari and it worked for me. the reacting is slightly slowerNn gg wrote:
CoW is better cuz:1. CoN Graphics is not nice
2. On safari no buttons work once logging in
3. Slow reacting(slower than CoW) everything
idk works for me. you have to use a PC by e way cause CoN doesnt work on mobileNn gg wrote:
yes, graphics are bad. On safari, nothing works once I log in.RiverWolf74 wrote:
Graphics are bad, but i played CoN on safari and it worked for me. the reacting is slightly slowerNn gg wrote:
CoW is better cuz:1. CoN Graphics is not nice
2. On safari no buttons work once logging in
3. Slow reacting(slower than CoW) everything
hey I just realised CON is not by Bryto, donβt expect it to be that good.
what CoN is by bytroNn gg wrote:
hey I just realised CON is not by Bryto, donβt expect it to be that good.
thatβs what I thought too. Itβs by dorado
RiverWolf74 wrote:
what CoN is by bytroNn gg wrote:
hey I just realised CON is not by Bryto, donβt expect it to be that good.
well bytro must have partnered with dorado games or dorado is breaking copyright law as CoN also has a forum and is pretty much the sane design as call of war . and CoN isnt that bad it is definely better than new world empires or supremey 1914Nn gg wrote:
thatβs what I thought too. Itβs by doradoRiverWolf74 wrote:
what CoN is by bytroNn gg wrote:
hey I just realised CON is not by Bryto, donβt expect it to be that good.
maybe they asked bryto labs to design?
I will make a new poll pls wait, I made the previous one time out
yeah bytro partnered with dorado games. if you search bytro then you will find CoN
supremacy 1914 is quite good, supremancy1 is also goodRiverWolf74 wrote:
well bytro must have partnered with dorado games or dorado is breaking copyright law as CoN also has a forum and is pretty much the sane design as call of war . and CoN isnt that bad it is definely better than new world empires or supremey 1914Nn gg wrote:
thatβs what I thought too. Itβs by doradoRiverWolf74 wrote:
what CoN is by bytroNn gg wrote:
hey I just realised CON is not by Bryto, donβt expect it to be that good.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.