Quasi-duck wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
Imagine a huge heli coming at you with rockets, gatlings, machine guns, etc. Plus carrying 20 soldiers inside.
Are you sure it is a full 20? All that extra gear may make it so that it has to carry less troops.
20 in what the chinook or the hind?
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists-Friedrich von Hayeoceanhawk wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
Imagine a huge heli coming at you with rockets, gatlings, machine guns, etc. Plus carrying 20 soldiers inside.
Are you sure it is a full 20? All that extra gear may make it so that it has to carry less troops.
20 in what the chinook or the hind?
Chinook.
The past is a foreign country.
oceanhawk wrote:
20 in what the chinook or the hind?
The Hind can only carry 8 troops, come on man basic aircraft knowledge here.
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
20 in what the chinook or the hind?
The Hind can only carry 8 troops, come on man basic aircraft knowledge here.
Gotta double check what your saying
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists-Friedrich von HayeAlso a Chinook can carry more than 20 troops...
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists-Friedrich von Hayeoceanhawk wrote:
Also a Chinook can carry more than 20 troops...
You sure? This is a variant armed to the teeth with extra weaponry that is generally fairly heavy, like, y'know, a .50 cal HMG.
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
Also a Chinook can carry more than 20 troops...
You sure? This is a variant armed to the teeth with extra weaponry that is generally fairly heavy, like, y'know, a .50 cal HMG.
o, you talking about ACH-47
Thought you were talking about standard CH-47
ACH-47 , also had grenade launchers.
To be honest, they weren't that big of a deal, they only tested a few as well
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists-Friedrich von Haye