
25 Jul 2016, 20:54


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Let's have some banter, people!
Please log in to post a reply.


Those things are at the epicentre of so much friendly fire.oceanhawk wrote:
What you mean?Lord Asher wrote:
Those things are at the epicentre of so much friendly fire.oceanhawk wrote:
Like getting so much friendly fire, or giving out friendly fire?

The ANT-20 is pretty cool. It was a pre-WW2 Russian aircraft that was basically a flying office building.


pretty cool, is that 8 propellers?GreatbigHippo wrote:
The ANT-20 is pretty cool. It was a pre-WW2 Russian aircraft that was basically a flying office building.

Giving out a lot, though mostly on the basis the pilots are trigger-happy.oceanhawk wrote:
What you mean?Lord Asher wrote:
Those things are at the epicentre of so much friendly fire.oceanhawk wrote:
Like getting so much friendly fire, or giving out friendly fire?
6.oceanhawk wrote:
pretty cool, is that 8 propellers?GreatbigHippo wrote:
The ANT-20 is pretty cool. It was a pre-WW2 Russian aircraft that was basically a flying office building.
Ahh, well cant deny they are pretty lethal...Lord Asher wrote:
Giving out a lot, though mostly on the basis the pilots are trigger-happy.oceanhawk wrote:
What you mean?Like getting so much friendly fire, or giving out friendly fire?Lord Asher wrote:
Those things are at the epicentre of so much friendly fire.oceanhawk wrote:
They recently did the first highway landing in like 15years or something, cant rememebr the details, but a few of them in the Baltics, maybe it was Estonia conducted a landing on a highway there
hasnt been done in like a good few years..
just shows how much of a beast they were..
Shame that they want to get rid of them for that sack of junk/ F-35

The USAF hates them and has wanted to get rid of them since they came in.oceanhawk wrote:
Shame that they want to get rid of them for that sack of junk/ F-35
Well, I guess we'll have to go back to our F-15s. *sighs*Quasi-duck wrote:
The USAF hates them and has wanted to get rid of them since they came in.
Maybe when the Spanish economy does better, we'll have to get a domestically-designed plane.
Don't Spanish submarines run on alcohol?
I'm just waiting for the new British equipment for 2020, though I think it's ugly.
Really? Gosh, nobody has ever heard that beforeQuasi-duck wrote:
The USAF hates them and has wanted to get rid of them since they came in.oceanhawk wrote:
Shame that they want to get rid of them for that sack of junk/ F-35
The Air force, is in a bad place.. Navy needs to scrap these plans and go back to 18s, and Airforce needs to revive the High-Low mix
Marines, Meh they one of the main reasons the F-35 is the dog pile of crap it is

You know, the kind of friendly fire that gives out hugs and world peace and makes children run in joyoceanhawk wrote:
Like getting so much friendly fire, or giving out friendly fire?
ahh I seeEllio_98 wrote:
You know, the kind of friendly fire that gives out hugs and world peace and makes children run in joyoceanhawk wrote:
Like getting so much friendly fire, or giving out friendly fire?

Hahahahahahahaha, nearly. Diesel.GreatbigHippo wrote:
Don't Spanish submarines run on alcohol?
Lol, just use nothing but 18's and 10'soceanhawk wrote:
The Air force, is in a bad place.. Navy needs to scrap these plans and go back to 18s, and Airforce needs to revive the High-Low mix

The F-35 is so over-funded thanks to corruption in the US, it is too big to fail. You've all been saying that the US is going to lose power in the skies, but you all seem to have forgotten the bigger fact that the US plans on exporting this hunk of junk. It is going to be like the F-104 Starfighter but worse.oceanhawk wrote:
the F-35 is the dog pile of crap it is
Are you sure? According to this the S-80 class has 3 bio-ethanol engines.Pablo22510 wrote:
Hahahahahahahaha, nearly. Diesel.GreatbigHippo wrote:
Don't Spanish submarines run on alcohol?
That's it. Ethanol. Soz.GreatbigHippo wrote:
Are you sure? According to this the S-80 class has 3 bio-ethanol engines.
Haha, that aint low high mix silly...Quasi-duck wrote:
Lol, just use nothing but 18's and 10'soceanhawk wrote:
The Air force, is in a bad place.. Navy needs to scrap these plans and go back to 18s, and Airforce needs to revive the High-Low mix
The F-35 is so over-funded thanks to corruption in the US, it is too big to fail. You've all been saying that the US is going to lose power in the skies, but you all seem to have forgotten the bigger fact that the US plans on exporting this hunk of junk. It is going to be like the F-104 Starfighter but worse.oceanhawk wrote:
the F-35 is the dog pile of crap it is
Need to have something like F-15 +F-16
The f-15, big beast of the skies, this is the quality of the airforce.. Even look at it.. twin engines, and the F-16 Has one..
F-16 Was meant to be the low, the quantity.. to do stuff like bombing insurgents.. And remember I told you, most of the bombing missions in Iraq, are actually being done by B-1s..
Need to scrap the f-35, and invest in the F-18 and the F-15
Like, who da fk decided to make a jet for all 3 branches?
And the worst part is, they want to retire the A-10 for the F-35...
Putin is laughing at America now... just counting the days till F-35 enter full service... But even still he getting annoyed, cos of all the delays..

Please log in to post a reply.