Well, recently I came across a few people saying Global warming is a lot of BS, or something like that. I am not very informed on this topic, and well Im happy to admit that.
I think we are not being told some things, regarding the "Global warming idea" , and I know that the polar ice caps bloddy well grew, but to those who were saying, its a hoax. Can you explain to me why?, I aint trying to debate, I have no clue just want to hear what you are saying, thks
whoever else has something, I should know, pls post
Thks guys
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
372 Replies
12 Jun 2016, 13:28
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
No, he is Chinese
What is his name?
oceanhawk wrote:
Do you really think, everybody id equal in North Korea? Screw that
I guess NK isn't communist then, only in name.
oceanhawk wrote:
Everybody is equal in an Anarchist society.
Nah, no government means no forces to hold back the criminals. You think that'll work well?
oceanhawk wrote:
And everybody is equal in a conservative society
Wow, really? Like America in the 50's?
I will look it up in a sec
Nah NK just a communist state
I dont like anarchism, but it is fair. Everybody has the chance to be wealthy. Everybody has the chance to be poor. Everybody has the chance to do what they want. Now, really I actually hate Anarchism.
I believe that the government has a duty to protect all its citizens, from poverty, criminals and foreign threats. However I believe the best way to achieve this, is through conservative ideals.
Freedom=fairness is my point. And Im not talking about social issues here, cos in that case Libertarian is the best.
But from a fiscal view, conservatism and libertarianism allow everybody to be equal..
Tell me, seriously do have you ever actually double thought about communism, its soo stupid. There is no incentive to improve soceity, it runs on fat greed. The Government is an overhead of society. The private sector do things best.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
12 Jun 2016, 13:29
oceanhawk wrote:
Can't watch that, I am watching "We Were Soldiers".
12 Jun 2016, 13:32
oceanhawk wrote:
Freedom=fairness is my point. And Im not talking about social issues here, cos in that case Libertarian is the best.
But from a fiscal view, conservatism and libertarianism allow everybody to be equal..
You think it is fair that the kid from the poor family has less chances than the rich kid does because the poor kid has worse schooling?
oceanhawk wrote:
I dont like anarchism, but it is fair. Everybody has the chance to be wealthy. Everybody has the chance to be poor. Everybody has the chance to do what they want. Now, really I actually hate Anarchism.
I believe that the government has a duty to protect all its citizens, from poverty, criminals and foreign threats. However I believe the best way to achieve this, is through conservative ideals.
Then don't suggest anarchism. Governments generally keep people safe, unless it is, say, a corrupt, capitalist nation like Nazi Germany.
12 Jun 2016, 13:33
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
Can't watch that, I am watching "We Were Soldiers".
then go ahead, tell me why you are on the forums.. lol
that movie is too good to be interrupted, however if you are really hanging here in the forums, go watch that clip.
Are are you scared of the truth? cos right now, I think you are. You are too scared
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
12 Jun 2016, 13:37
oceanhawk wrote:
then go ahead, tell me why you are on the forums.. lol
that movie is too good to be interrupted, however if you are really hanging here in the forums, go watch that clip.
Are are you scared of the truth? cos right now, I think you are. You are too scared
I don't have to put on headphones to type, now do I? I have a TV and laptop in my room, so I can do this, not watch a video though.
12 Jun 2016, 13:44
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
Freedom=fairness is my point. And Im not talking about social issues here, cos in that case Libertarian is the best.
But from a fiscal view, conservatism and libertarianism allow everybody to be equal..
You think it is fair that the kid from the poor family has less chances than the rich kid does because the poor kid has worse schooling?
oceanhawk wrote:
I dont like anarchism, but it is fair. Everybody has the chance to be wealthy. Everybody has the chance to be poor. Everybody has the chance to do what they want. Now, really I actually hate Anarchism.
I believe that the government has a duty to protect all its citizens, from poverty, criminals and foreign threats. However I believe the best way to achieve this, is through conservative ideals.
Then don't suggest anarchism. Governments generally keep people safe, unless it is, say, a corrupt, capitalist nation like Nazi Germany.
Firstly if the government didnt attack private schools like it does, their costs would lower. However even with the the tax breaks because the government isnt now provide public schools. The costs still could be high.
So firstly the costs would fall
Secondly, more competition between private schools, improves the facilities and quality of education at the schools. From firsrt hand expierence of the private schools and public schools here in Dublin. I can tell you know, that the Privates schools are a lot better, and I wish everybody could go there.
But even still, some parents still couldn't afford to get their children into a good school. Hence the Conservative program, of vouchers. School vouchers for low income familes. The government gives vouchers to poor parents, so they can get their children into a good school, where they wont get stuck in the same loop they themselves are in.
Now it is true, that a lot of libertarians, wouldn't support this, but either way I am not a libertarian, and mainly due to this reason
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
12 Jun 2016, 13:44
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
then go ahead, tell me why you are on the forums.. lol
that movie is too good to be interrupted, however if you are really hanging here in the forums, go watch that clip.
Are are you scared of the truth? cos right now, I think you are. You are too scared
I don't have to put on headphones to type, now do I? I have a TV and laptop in my room, so I can do this, not watch a video though.
Yes but you are not focused on the film
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
12 Jun 2016, 13:48
This thread is a discussion about global warming, it is not necessary to deflect the thread.
About the Global Warning:
Do you think that you we need to take new measures?
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius. "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
12 Jun 2016, 13:48
oceanhawk wrote:
Firstly if the government didnt attack private schools like it does, their costs would lower. However even with the the tax breaks because the government isnt now provide public schools. The costs still could be high.
So firstly the costs would fall
Secondly, more competition between private schools, improves the facilities and quality of education at the schools. From firsrt hand expierence of the private schools and public schools here in Dublin. I can tell you know, that the Privates schools are a lot better, and I wish everybody could go there.
But even still, some parents still couldn't afford to get their children into a good school. Hence the Conservative program, of vouchers. School vouchers for low income familes. The government gives vouchers to poor parents, so they can get their children into a good school, where they wont get stuck in the same loop they themselves are in.
Now it is true, that a lot of libertarians, wouldn't support this, but either way I am not a libertarian, and mainly due to this reason
That sounds awful.
Do you not remember the history of Ireland? You know what made this nation great? Free public schools! Free primary and secondary level educations! That is what brought Ireland to what it was a few years ago, and can soon be again.
12 Jun 2016, 13:49
Quasi-duck wrote:
Do you not remember the history of Ireland? You know what made this nation great? Free public schools! Free primary and secondary level educations! That is what brought Ireland to what it was a few years ago, and can soon be again.
What it has to do with global warming?
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius. "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
12 Jun 2016, 18:13
Quasi-duck wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
Firstly if the government didnt attack private schools like it does, their costs would lower. However even with the the tax breaks because the government isnt now provide public schools. The costs still could be high.
So firstly the costs would fall
Secondly, more competition between private schools, improves the facilities and quality of education at the schools. From firsrt hand expierence of the private schools and public schools here in Dublin. I can tell you know, that the Privates schools are a lot better, and I wish everybody could go there.
But even still, some parents still couldn't afford to get their children into a good school. Hence the Conservative program, of vouchers. School vouchers for low income familes. The government gives vouchers to poor parents, so they can get their children into a good school, where they wont get stuck in the same loop they themselves are in.
Now it is true, that a lot of libertarians, wouldn't support this, but either way I am not a libertarian, and mainly due to this reason
That sounds awful.
Do you not remember the history of Ireland? You know what made this nation great? Free public schools! Free primary and secondary level educations! That is what brought Ireland to what it was a few years ago, and can soon be again.
I dont want to kill public schools, I want to move more kids to the private schools. It is better, not just for academics, but for sports and just a better sense of community there. Ever read that "Ross O'carrol Kelly book?
Seriously do, do you know the main reason Private schools are better
actually in general, why private enterprise is better?
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
12 Jun 2016, 18:21
oceanhawk wrote:
I dont want to kill public schools, I want to move more kids to the private schools. It is better, not just for academics, but for sports and just a better sense of community there. Ever read that "Ross O'carrol Kelly book?
Seriously do, do you know the main reason Private schools are better
actually in general, why private enterprise is better?
This is a thread about global warming, respected thread.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius. "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
12 Jun 2016, 18:42
This is total related, this political discussion is heating up the Earth!
12 Jun 2016, 19:21
@Quasi-duck is right, we are discussing ideas, that effect the politcal stance, and economic views of earth.
Plus I made this thread, and dont mind it
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
This is total related, this political discussion is heating up the Earth!
No.
Since this topic has been diverted, I'll leave, this thread.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius. "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
12 Jun 2016, 20:42
Caesar wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
This is total related, this political discussion is heating up the Earth!
No.
Since this topic has been diverted, I'll leave, this thread.
Cool. Unlike the Earth! Er, sort of...
12 Jun 2016, 20:44
Quasi-duck wrote:
Cool. Unlike the Earth! Er, sort of...
No.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius. "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
🔒This thread is locked. No new replies can be posted.