Global Warming?

Seriously do, Communism is a joke

the main reason

Competition is better than Monopoly

oceanhawk wrote:

Seriously do,

oceanhawk wrote:

Communism is a joke

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Seriously do,

Seriously though, it is though

oceanhawk wrote:

Communism is a joke

You are free to believe what you want, doesn't make you right.

No your right, what makes me right is the explanation, facts and reasons

oceanhawk wrote:

No your right, what makes me right is the explanation, facts and reasons

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

No your right, what makes me right is the explanation, facts and reasons

Go on then.

there is no incentive to do well, in a commie world. There is no innovation, no creativity and no hope

oceanhawk wrote:

there is no incentive to do well, in a commie world.

oceanhawk wrote:

There is no innovation

oceanhawk wrote:

no creativity

oceanhawk wrote:

no hope

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

there is no incentive to do well, in a commie world.

You'd be wrong, they get medals!

oceanhawk wrote:

There is no innovation

Soviets got to space first, as did their dogs.

oceanhawk wrote:

no creativity

Soviet innovations in WWII still affect today's technology, and the Soviets were building a laser tank well before the US and Britain got to it.

oceanhawk wrote:

no hope

Ehm, look at WWII alone....

Innovation, haha consumer goods, there is not drive, or creativity to start something new.

Again... USSR never had people thinking, what will make peoples lives better

People cant do what they want, communism sucks

oceanhawk wrote:

Medals isnt the same as a nice car, happy life and nice house

oceanhawk wrote:

Innovation, haha consumer goods, there is not drive, or creativity to start something new.

oceanhawk wrote:

Again... USSR never had people thinking, what will make peoples lives better

oceanhawk wrote:

People cant do what they want, communism sucks

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Medals isnt the same as a nice car, happy life and nice house

Your opinion, the Soviets loved them.

oceanhawk wrote:

Innovation, haha consumer goods, there is not drive, or creativity to start something new.

You do know that Soviets did not care for "consumer goods" because it was associated with bourgeois. Hell, even polite manners were petit-bourgeois.

oceanhawk wrote:

Again... USSR never had people thinking, what will make peoples lives better

Ehm, they did. Why do you think there was an agricultural revolution?

oceanhawk wrote:

People cant do what they want, communism sucks

Eh, that would be wrong, again. At least in the USSR there were no "whites only" places. Y'know, I'm pretty sure that the USSR was the only nation to have women on the frontlines fighting with the men because the government pushed for feminism or however you want to put it.

And use a real problem with conservative views ( I know you are having trouble finding one)

And in the USSR, people instead were sent to the gulag, for trying to get freedom, or food

Yes, the Soviets didnt care for medical breakthroughs, or even improvements in everyday life, like better coffee machines, or more efficient cars. I think I see one of the many flaws..

Gosh, communism, the bigest failure I have ever heard of,

Can you pls, actually present one issue with Conservative views. On fiscal matters pls. And if you want to toss in a clip, for evidence feel free.

They are still arguing about Communism and capitalism?

When they are going to realize that these two ideologies they have caused are: wars, famines, disasters, etc. are bad

Caesar wrote:

They are still arguing about Communism and capitalism?

When they are going to realize that these two ideologies they have caused are: wars, famines, disasters, etc. are bad

Thks communism..

Capitalism, in particular conservative views, prevent famine

oceanhawk wrote:

And in the USSR, people instead were sent to the gulag, for trying to get freedom, or food

oceanhawk wrote:

Yes, the Soviets didnt care for medical breakthroughs, or even improvements in everyday life, like better coffee machines, or more efficient cars. I think I see one of the many flaws..

The entries in this timeline fall into the following categories:

• Indigenous inventions, like airliners, AC transformers, radio receivers, TV, artificial satellites, ICBMs
• Products and objects that are uniquely Russian, like Saint Basil's Cathedral, Matryoshka dolls, Russian vodka
• Products and objects with superlative characteristics, like the Tsar Bomba, the AK-47, and Typhoon class submarine
• Scientific and medical discoveries, like the periodic law, vitamins, stem cells, and viruses

oceanhawk wrote:

Can you pls, actually present one issue with Conservative views.

oceanhawk wrote:

On fiscal matters pls

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Can you pls, actually present one issue with Conservative views.

Does not do much to help the poor.

Tell me where...

School vouchers, so poor familes dont have their children stick in the same rubbish public school loop

Or is it loans available, so people can start business

Or when Conservatives, grant people the option, to choice what to do with their money

or for opposing welfare, which encourages failure

Because the "price and rent controls" promoted by leftest parties, are doing great?

You tell me, right now exactly where, cos that is too vague.

oceanhawk wrote:

School vouchers, so poor familes dont have their children stick in the same rubbish public school loop

oceanhawk wrote:

Or is it loans available, so people can start business

oceanhawk wrote:

Or when Conservatives, grant people the option, to choice what to do with their money

oceanhawk wrote:

Because the "price and rent controls" promoted by leftest parties, are doing great?

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

School vouchers, so poor familes dont have their children stick in the same rubbish public school loop

It isn't free? Pity.

oceanhawk wrote:

Or is it loans available, so people can start business

You can only get those if the banks are sure you can pay it back.

oceanhawk wrote:

Or when Conservatives, grant people the option, to choice what to do with their money

What money? They have none, they are poor because of a lack of labour laws so they have to work for next to nothing to try and keep their jobs secure. I mean, they are unskilled because they didn't get a free education.

oceanhawk wrote:

Because the "price and rent controls" promoted by leftest parties, are doing great?

They haven't really been implemented, look at all the families being evicted in Ireland. Look at how expensive it is to stay in some American cities.

Hahaha, is that a joke? They aint unskilled, after they get that work. They aint poor after they get that work

You would rather they dont work, and stay on welfare ( paid by the factories) and not contribute to society.

If the people arent happy with their wages DONT WORK THERE!

Henry Ford, paid his workers well above the min wage, because he valued the workers, and he didnt want them to go to other companies and share the great ideas of ford's production line. Hence the wages went up, and up.

And are you saying, that a bunch of labour laws, would have helped china? Of course not, its an economic powerhouse cos its switching to capitalist ideas.

People get that money, if the money is available. And it isnt where there is huge taxes, on high income earners.

Banks will be happy to take more risk, if there is a good money flow, and there is when rich people are investing their income.

Price controls. are so stupid.

It just results in less houses being built, because of the incentive by builders being destroyed. Rather than have a competitve market, drive the price down. More and more stupid ideas, from the socialists in the world.

oceanhawk wrote:

Hahaha, is that a joke? They aint unskilled, after they get that work. They aint poor after they get that work

You would rather they dont work, and stay on welfare ( paid by the factories) and not contribute to society.

If the people arent happy with their wages DONT WORK THERE!

Henry Ford, paid his workers well above the min wage, because he valued the workers, and he didnt want them to go to other companies and share the great ideas of ford's production line. Hence the wages went up, and up.

And are you saying, that a bunch of labour laws, would have helped china? Of course not, its an economic powerhouse cos its switching to capitalist ideas.

People get that money, if the money is available. And it isnt where there is huge taxes, on high income earners.

Banks will be happy to take more risk, if there is a good money flow, and there is when rich people are investing their income.

Price controls. are so stupid.

It just results in less houses being built, because of the incentive by builders being destroyed. Rather than have a competitve market, drive the price down. More and more stupid ideas, from the socialists in the world.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Hahaha, is that a joke? They aint unskilled, after they get that work. They aint poor after they get that work

You would rather they dont work, and stay on welfare ( paid by the factories) and not contribute to society.

If the people arent happy with their wages DONT WORK THERE!

Henry Ford, paid his workers well above the min wage, because he valued the workers, and he didnt want them to go to other companies and share the great ideas of ford's production line. Hence the wages went up, and up.

And are you saying, that a bunch of labour laws, would have helped china? Of course not, its an economic powerhouse cos its switching to capitalist ideas.

People get that money, if the money is available. And it isnt where there is huge taxes, on high income earners.

Banks will be happy to take more risk, if there is a good money flow, and there is when rich people are investing their income.

Price controls. are so stupid.

It just results in less houses being built, because of the incentive by builders being destroyed. Rather than have a competitve market, drive the price down. More and more stupid ideas, from the socialists in the world.

Fresno, USA

15$minimum wage at its finest

oceanhawk wrote:

I agree..

15$minimum wage at its finest

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

I agree..

15$minimum wage at its finest

How the hell is that related to a high minimum wage?

Anyways,

On top of the point that there are many ghettos in the US, most other conservative countries have it way, way worse, not only when it comes to wealth, but civil rights as well. 90% of "conservative" countries make the US look liberal.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

I agree..

15$minimum wage at its finest

How the hell is that related to a high minimum wage?