American commentators are most likely biased, so an unreliable source.oceanhawk wrote:
Yea no, it doesnt work. It is stupid, unfair on poor people and rich peoplethis short clip, by one of the greatest economists, sets the stage
Global Warming?
Well, recently I came across a few people saying Global warming is a lot of BS, or something like that. I am not very informed on this topic, and well Im happy to admit that.
I think we are not being told some things, regarding the "Global warming idea" , and I know that the polar ice caps bloddy well grew, but to those who were saying, its a hoax. Can you explain to me why?, I aint trying to debate, I have no clue just want to hear what you are saying, thks
whoever else has something, I should know, pls post
Thks guys 

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
372 Replies
He has a noble prize for economics, this is a reliable source#Quasi-duck wrote:
American commentators are most likely biased, so an unreliable source.oceanhawk wrote:
Yea no, it doesnt work. It is stupid, unfair on poor people and rich peoplethis short clip, by one of the greatest economists, sets the stage
your counterargument is nonsense,
try again

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Brainwashed!oceanhawk wrote:
He has a noble prize for economics, this is a reliable source#
I never counter-argued, just said your source is probably biased.oceanhawk wrote:
your counterargument is nonsense,
Thats a load of SHI11TQuasi-duck wrote:
Brainwashed!oceanhawk wrote:
He has a noble prize for economics, this is a reliable source#I never counter-argued, just said your source is probably biased.oceanhawk wrote:
your counterargument is nonsense,
It isnt biased, its fact
That is something you leftest, struggle to understand. FACT
go back to nightmares, we live in reality where we make dreams reality. Because they work
Communism sucks, you haven't made a case why it is good or why Conservative fiscal views suck
so to end it off, Conservatism is still better

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
You said it! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH I WIN!oceanhawk wrote:
Conservative fiscal views suck
Quasi-duck wrote:
You said it! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH I WIN!oceanhawk wrote:
Communism sucks, you haven't made a case why it is goodor why Conservative fiscal views suck
oceanhawk wrote:
Thats a load of SHI11TQuasi-duck wrote:
Brainwashed!oceanhawk wrote:
He has a noble prize for economics, this is a reliable source#I never counter-argued, just said your source is probably biased.oceanhawk wrote:
your counterargument is nonsense,It isnt biased, its fact
That is something you leftest, struggle to understand. FACT
go back to nightmares, we live in reality where we make dreams reality. Because they work
Communism sucks, you haven't made a case why it is good
or why Conservative fiscal views suck
so to end it off, Conservatism is still better

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Quote the full thingy, and I win 

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Nope! You specifically said "Conservative fiscal views suck".oceanhawk wrote:
Quote the full thingy, and I win
and you agreed that communism suckQuasi-duck wrote:
Nope! You specifically said "Conservative fiscal views suck".oceanhawk wrote:
Quote the full thingy, and I win
Quote the full thingy, and I win

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Quote it, I can quote you.oceanhawk wrote:
you agreed that communism suck
Not really.oceanhawk wrote:
Quote the full thingy, and I win
Anyways, I think we all know this is just going to go around and around. So I'm not going to continue, especially since you already said CONSERVATIVE FISCAL VIEWS SUCK AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
if you move around a few words, yea..Quasi-duck wrote:
Quote it, I can quote you.oceanhawk wrote:
you agreed that communism suckNot really.oceanhawk wrote:
Quote the full thingy, and I winAnyways, I think we all know this is just going to go around and around. So I'm not going to continue, especially since you already said CONSERVATIVE FISCAL VIEWS SUCK AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
otherwise, havent actually said it

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
In the end of the day, you have no Reason, Support or Evidence that Communism is good. It sucks. It is stupid, and is the a lie.
You just refuse to accept you are wrong.

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
I'd remove that!oceanhawk wrote:
It is John Michael, and is the a lie.
Or do you?oceanhawk wrote:
You just refuse to accept you are wrong.
what?Quasi-duck wrote:
I'd remove that!oceanhawk wrote:
It is John Michael, and is the a lie.
Or do you?oceanhawk wrote:
You just refuse to accept you are wrong.
no its you, that are wrong

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Or is it you!?oceanhawk wrote:
what?no its you, that are wrong
Nah cos I have a reason, you dontQuasi-duck wrote:
Or is it you!?oceanhawk wrote:
what?no its you, that are wrong


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Or do I have a reason, and you don't!?oceanhawk wrote:
Nah cos I have a reason, you dont
I'm not questioning the effectiveness of the medicine. I'm questioning the availability.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha, best medicine and doctors in the world come from USA, UK, Austria,Sure wasnt it an American machine that was keeping some soviet leader, alive during the last few days of his life?GreatbigHippo wrote:
My point is that the methods used to count the deaths caused by Stalin are flawed, and I'm using those same methods. This statement is flawed.oceanhawk wrote:
Go on, lets hear this then...GreatbigHippo wrote:
If I count deaths caused by the capitalist world the same way the west counts deaths caused by communism, there have been more than 500,000,000 deaths worldwide as a direct result of capitalism.oceanhawk wrote:
Killing 20million citizens, well done StalinI'm not even counting wars.Mostly deaths due to peoples inability to pay for food or medicine in capitalist countries over the last 50 years.Quasi-duck wrote:
WWI and WWII alone is pretty bad. Then the Brits in India and the like.oceanhawk wrote:
Go on, lets hear this then...
you are a balls
You guys just keep getting mad at each other, this argument is going nowhere. stop pls 
ahem.. here's the quote:
"We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light."
It was pretty available, see in the free market, there is lots of competition, and lower costs to produce. So if companies want to do well, they innovate the market and compete with other competitorsGreatbigHippo wrote:
I'm not questioning the effectiveness of the medicine. I'm questioning the availability.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha, best medicine and doctors in the world come from USA, UK, Austria,Sure wasnt it an American machine that was keeping some soviet leader, alive during the last few days of his life?GreatbigHippo wrote:
My point is that the methods used to count the deaths caused by Stalin are flawed, and I'm using those same methods. This statement is flawed.oceanhawk wrote:
Go on, lets hear this then...GreatbigHippo wrote:
If I count deaths caused by the capitalist world the same way the west counts deaths caused by communism, there have been more than 500,000,000 deaths worldwide as a direct result of capitalism.oceanhawk wrote:
Killing 20million citizens, well done StalinI'm not even counting wars.Mostly deaths due to peoples inability to pay for food or medicine in capitalist countries over the last 50 years.Quasi-duck wrote:
WWI and WWII alone is pretty bad. Then the Brits in India and the like.oceanhawk wrote:
Go on, lets hear this then...

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye