Global Warming?

Good, I'm glad I got the polar bears across, @oceanhawk! They are the perfect representative of global warming.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Good, I'm glad I got the polar bears across, @oceanhawk! They are the perfect representative of global warming.

just the tought of polar bears in distress is enough..

like who ever the hell wants to dig up alaska for some oil.. gosh I wanna hit them in the face with a flag pole

Tell that to the politicians driving Hummers on the streets burning 10 liters per 1 km.

LOL and you know what Pablo thinks: he thinks that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy. He thinks that the temperatures are acctually falling and that the water levels are falling too. That was in school and I wanted to punch him so much, but I resisted my anger.

Why does he think that...?

Quasi-duck wrote:

Why does he think that...?

Dont punch pablo..

lol

push him down the kami haha @FilipALFA

oceanhawk wrote:

Dont punch pablo..

lol

push him down the kami haha @FilipALFA

Stay on topic.

--- Global Warming is real. On one hand, you have scientific proof. On the other hand, you have people who simply say they do not "believe" in Global Warming. Calling these people skeptics is to much as well, considering a skeptic has proof on their end to dispute with.

---The World is already screwed. From new documents that were leaked, Oil and Gas companies knew how all of this would screw up the world for a very, very long time

"Global warming itself is true, but perhaps the human factors are somewhat of a hoax. There's just too much conspiracy and skepticism going around that it's hard to tell what's even true and what isn't. Government agencies lie all the time, (including NASA, CIA, NSA, etc.), and others. At this point, best kind of research is done by independent scientists, universities, etc. If they can prove most of it was man-made, then the debate is over."

Nonsense.

Conspiracy? Do you mean the fools that go around with no proof at all, making up wild theories and nonsense?

Skeptics? Mostly the above calling themselves a different name, or paid Republican shills.

Enough research has been done. You simply are not looking at it.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/what-does-scientific-consensus-mean-618f93c4513b#.fn8qfxv6c

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11462-climate-change-a-guide-for-the-perplexed#.VP2QSPnF_To

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/

http://www.skepticalscience.com/

Just curious, but what if they made a Call of War map if the polar ice caps had melted?

FilipALFA wrote:

LOL and you know what Pablo thinks: he thinks that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy. He thinks that the temperatures are acctually falling and that the water levels are falling too. That was in school and I wanted to punch him so much, but I resisted my anger.

Simple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Simple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.

Besides, Ocean should know this anyway 'cos he went to an Irish school, pretty sure science is compulsory in all/most of them.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Besides, Ocean should know this anyway 'cos he went to an Irish school, pretty sure science is compulsory in all/most of them.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Compulsory over here too. But I'd rather leave the topic: my friends, both online and irl, are angry at me. So buh-bye

Quasi-duck wrote:

Serves you right.

Pablo22510 wrote:

In an open society, anyone can believe what they want.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

Serves you right.

Nah, it doesn't. In an open society, anyone can believe what they want.

You are free to believe whatever you like, no matter how wrong it is, and as long as those beliefs never triumph over fact, never enter into the courtroom nor the Congress, that they remain only within your heart, until the day they vanish from the face of this Earth.

--- Oh. And: http://phys.org/news/2005-08-ice-sea.html

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Sea-level-rise-due-to-floating-ice.html

(Don't forget all the ice on land that is melting as well.)

http://www.climatehotmap.org/global-warming-effects/sea-level.html

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevelclimate.html

CzarHellios wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

Serves you right.

Nah, it doesn't. In an open society, anyone can believe what they want.

I really hate when people say this. "It is a open society, I can believe in whatever I like!" - In an open and free society, we should presevere to eliminate ignorance, further knowledge, to grow and evolve.

You are free to believe whatever you like, no matter how wrong it is, and as long as those beliefs never triumph over fact, never enter into the courtroom nor the Congress, that they remain only within your heart, until the day they vanish from the face of this Earth.

--- Oh. And: http://phys.org/news/2005-08-ice-sea.html

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Sea-level-rise-due-to-floating-ice.html

(Don't forget all the ice on land that is melting as well.)

http://www.climatehotmap.org/global-warming-effects/sea-level.html

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevelclimate.html

However, I'm a weird kind of climate change skeptic. I presume most of you believe the solution is going renewable, right? Well I do, too. That way we can stop pollution, stop financing terrorists and become self-sufficient.

Pablo22510 wrote:

FilipALFA wrote:

LOL and you know what Pablo thinks: he thinks that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy. He thinks that the temperatures are acctually falling and that the water levels are falling too. That was in school and I wanted to punch him so much, but I resisted my anger.

@oceanhawk

Simple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Simple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.

Oh my God you're...... uh, wrong. Can't use other words. You're horribly wrong.

Besides, Ocean should know this anyway 'cos he went to an Irish school, pretty sure science is compulsory in all/most of them.

and I made a mess of the journal

hmmm.. this is getting intersting now haha