Well, recently I came across a few people saying Global warming is a lot of BS, or something like that. I am not very informed on this topic, and well Im happy to admit that.
I think we are not being told some things, regarding the "Global warming idea" , and I know that the polar ice caps bloddy well grew, but to those who were saying, its a hoax. Can you explain to me why?, I aint trying to debate, I have no clue just want to hear what you are saying, thks
whoever else has something, I should know, pls post
Thks guys 
So is this:Quasi-duck wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
Yeah, but that isn't Beijing, is it?
No way. China is a very important and powerful country. It will substitue Russia in the eternal USA vs Russia tensions.oceanhawk wrote:
China is a mess, such a joke of a country
Hot water expands too an occupies more volume than ice. SCIENCED BEACHPablo22510 wrote:
@oceanhawkFilipALFA wrote:
LOL and you know what Pablo thinks: he thinks that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy. He thinks that the temperatures are acctually falling and that the water levels are falling too. That was in school and I wanted to punch him so much, but I resisted my anger.Simple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.
Although I was agreeing with you earlier.FilipALFA wrote:
Hot water expands too an occupies more volume than ice. SCIENCED BEACHPablo22510 wrote:
@oceanhawkSimple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.FilipALFA wrote:
LOL and you know what Pablo thinks: he thinks that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy. He thinks that the temperatures are acctually falling and that the water levels are falling too. That was in school and I wanted to punch him so much, but I resisted my anger.
There is very little "hot" water around the place. Water is one of the worst conductors of heat, and hence warmt nor cold travel through the water. So there isnt hot water here
Pablo actually made a good point, and now Im like.. woo its a conspiracy all over again?
First off, ice cubes occupy the same space as the same amount of water, they just displace the water just as much the same amount of water would increase the volume of the water in a cup. If ice occupied more space than the water that was frozen to make the ice, where did the molecules go? Have you never put water in a ice tray and then freeze it? It's always the same level as the water you put in.oceanhawk wrote:
Although I was agreeing with you earlier.FilipALFA wrote:
Hot water expands too an occupies more volume than ice. SCIENCED BEACHPablo22510 wrote:
@oceanhawkSimple fact. Ice occupies more volume than water. That's why if you put water in a glass bottle and then put the bottle in the freezer, it'll end up cracking, due to the ice. Soooo, if ice melts, it'll change to water, which occupies less space sooooo water levels go down. Proved using science.FilipALFA wrote:
LOL and you know what Pablo thinks: he thinks that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy. He thinks that the temperatures are acctually falling and that the water levels are falling too. That was in school and I wanted to punch him so much, but I resisted my anger.There is very little "hot" water around the place. Water is one of the worst conductors of heat, and hence warmt nor cold travel through the water. So there isnt hot water here
Pablo actually made a good point, and now Im like.. woo its a conspiracy all over again?
Secondly, do you really think the 96% of the world's top scientists who have studied this for their whole lifetime overlooked the this miniscule fact?
Thirdly, it's proven that oceans are already rising, we are already building massive sea walls on cities and entire nations(Netherlands) to prevent flooding. How do you explain that?
And finally, here are some actual reasons WHY the oceans are rising due to ice melting,
1. The polar ice caps are made of freshwater, which when melted in saltwater, will make the water level rise because saltwater is denser then freshwater. (yes, this is true, and doesn't violate any theorems, test it for yourself, or just look up on the internet you lazy wanker)
2. A lot of these frozen ice caps sit on land, like Greenland, or Antarctica.
3. Less ice caps = more sun rays absorbed by oceans because the lack of ice to reflect it from the surface, cause it to heat up and expand (like Filipo said)
Please, please, just don't. I mean Pablo's a** hole is allready jelous of all that sh*t that he is typeing and that is coming out of his mouth. Don't turn into him. @Jacey521 is right and I wil support and vote him if he'd run for president.oceanhawk wrote:
woo its a conspiracy all over again?
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.FilipALFA wrote:
Please, please, just don't. I mean Pablo's a** hole is allready jelous of all that sh*t that he is typeing and that is coming out of his mouth. Don't turn into him. @Jacey521 is right and I wil support and vote him if he'd run for president.oceanhawk wrote:
woo its a conspiracy all over again?
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
Well, the USSR wasn't exactly alone.GreatbigHippo wrote:
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
The USSR and it's puppet states, who were dependent on the USSR, vs dozens of economically powerful and developed countries. Sure, there were other independent communist countries, but communists aren't really known for working together. It's incredible the USSR lasted as long as it did.Pablo22510 wrote:
Well, the USSR wasn't exactly alone.GreatbigHippo wrote:
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
Yeah, but it's their bloody fault their economies were weaker than the West's.GreatbigHippo wrote:
The USSR and it's puppet states, who were dependent on the USSR, vs dozens of economically powerful and developed countries. Sure, there were other independent communist countries, but communists aren't really known for working together. It's incredible the USSR lasted as long as it did.Pablo22510 wrote:
Well, the USSR wasn't exactly alone.GreatbigHippo wrote:
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
How is it their fault when the west tried for 70 years to destroy their economy? That sounds like the west's fault to me.Pablo22510 wrote:
Yeah, but it's their bloody fault their economies were weaker than the West's.GreatbigHippo wrote:
The USSR and it's puppet states, who were dependent on the USSR, vs dozens of economically powerful and developed countries. Sure, there were other independent communist countries, but communists aren't really known for working together. It's incredible the USSR lasted as long as it did.Pablo22510 wrote:
Well, the USSR wasn't exactly alone.GreatbigHippo wrote:
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
Oh, and the USSR didn't try and do the opposite?GreatbigHippo wrote:
How is it their fault when the west tried for 70 years to destroy their economy? That sounds like the west's fault to me.Pablo22510 wrote:
Yeah, but it's their bloody fault their economies were weaker than the West's.GreatbigHippo wrote:
The USSR and it's puppet states, who were dependent on the USSR, vs dozens of economically powerful and developed countries. Sure, there were other independent communist countries, but communists aren't really known for working together. It's incredible the USSR lasted as long as it did.Pablo22510 wrote:
Well, the USSR wasn't exactly alone.GreatbigHippo wrote:
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
Why couldnt the communist states, destroy the capitalist Economy's?GreatbigHippo wrote:
How is it their fault when the west tried for 70 years to destroy their economy? That sounds like the west's fault to me.Pablo22510 wrote:
Yeah, but it's their bloody fault their economies were weaker than the West's.GreatbigHippo wrote:
The USSR and it's puppet states, who were dependent on the USSR, vs dozens of economically powerful and developed countries. Sure, there were other independent communist countries, but communists aren't really known for working together. It's incredible the USSR lasted as long as it did.Pablo22510 wrote:
Well, the USSR wasn't exactly alone.GreatbigHippo wrote:
No, it fell apart because the entire capitalist world worked for over half a century to destroy it. The fact that it survived as long as it did shows it had a very strong economy for it's situation.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, it fell apart 'cos it's economy couldn't compete with ours.Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
Haha, how would the west "disagreeing" with the poor/ nonsense ideas ( from an economical standpoint, as well as everyother) make it fall?Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.
Nobody wanted to starve, hence communism fell
It is falling in VeVenezuela as we speak..
The USSR was one nation* against the entire world. I would not expect them to be able to destroy all of the capitalist economies.
*The USSR had a similar structure to the united states in that it was made up of several "sub-nations"
I hope your Spanish is good enough. It isn't very hard to grasp the meaning, anyway. @Quasi-duck @GreatbigHippo This is what socialism does.
The majority of Russians actually miss the old Soviet Union.oceanhawk wrote:
Haha, how would the west "disagreeing" with the poor/ nonsense ideas ( from an economical standpoint, as well as everyother) make it fall?Quasi-duck wrote:
Can't, the USSR fell apart because the "free" West disagreed with the opinions of the people there on how they wanted to rule their country.Pablo22510 wrote:
Filip, if you want to insult people for expressing their opinion, go back to the USSR.Nobody wanted to starve, hence communism fell
It is falling in VeVenezuela as we speak..
http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/08/chapter-3-russia-public-backs-putin-crimeas-secession/
Hahaha, yea right.GreatbigHippo wrote:
The majority of Russians actually miss the old Soviet Union.oceanhawk wrote:
Haha, how would the west "disagreeing" with the poor/ nonsense ideas ( from an economical standpoint, as well as everyother) make it fall?Nobody wanted to starve, hence communism fellQuasi-duck wrote:
It is falling in VeVenezuela as we speak..
http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/08/chapter-3-russia-public-backs-putin-crimeas-secession/
Name one country where conservative ideals have failed..
A real country as well pls..
