Karl v Nova0213 Chess

I must say, You are thinly veiled, i can metaphorically see through you.

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

Hahaha, You think I lost? I resigned, you were not worth playing with me, you are the Picasso of chess, and I am van Gogh, maybe farm heroes will do for you?

Tgufyru wrote:

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

Hahaha, You think I lost? I resigned, you were not worth playing with me, you are the Picasso of chess, and I am van Gogh, maybe farm heroes will do for you?

you high or smthng , from the opening I could tell you are no higher than 1200 in chess.com. That opening is trash, literally nobody plays it except for beginners.

whowh wrote:

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

I looked at the game, not good

Agreed here.

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

Tgufyru wrote:

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

Hahaha, You think I lost? I resigned, you were not worth playing with me, you are the Picasso of chess, and I am van Gogh, maybe farm heroes will do for you?

you high or smthng , from the opening I could tell you are no higher than 1200 in chess.com. That opening is trash, literally nobody plays it except for beginners.

I don't use software's to play chess, I just wanted to be easy on karl. But he still lost.

rarely anybody uses an engine to play chess . still if you wanted to be easy on him, you would play some sensible opening like scotch gambit, two knights defence, bishop’s opening etc

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

whowh wrote:

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

I looked at the game, not good

Agreed here.

Both are not at all good at chess. They cannot win against Gotham or Magnus.

Resigning when i have the advantage isnt Exactly sensible Isnt it??

Karl von Krass wrote:

I have the Stockfish10's Agreement, i am in an advantage.

Tgufyru wrote:

Karl von Krass wrote:

I have the Stockfish10's Agreement, i am in an advantage.

engine doesn’t matter in the opening , only in the middle and endgame where it shows the difference. You dont have a major advantage, it’s just a slight positional advantage, still playable for both sides.

I like chess, but for the life of me, you guys are on a different level.

Karl von Krass wrote:

Resigning when i have the advantage isnt Exactly sensible Isnt it??

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

Karl von Krass wrote:

Resigning when i have the advantage isnt Exactly sensible Isnt it??

You know, I've been talking about resigning since the start, just did it when the time came. That's it, nothing more than that, you aren't capable of playing me or any grandmasters, you better start practising farm heroes of candy Crush.

Claudio, no offense, but you're not even close to a grandmaster. I suck at chess. However, I do know enough to know that you are not a grandmaster.

i can say it's ALMOST an insult. You do know This is not how one ethically Communicates with a person? @Claudio von Panjim.

I was playing like a 1300 that game. I know that and do not deny, also "idk how to play sicilian so i copy him" opening is the perfect description of what you were doing. A copy cat opening but white wasted tempo on a useless move giving black the drive.

Claudio, is your wall related to this?

BrutusTrump wrote:

Claudio, is your wall related to this?

BrutusTrump wrote:

Claudio, is your wall related to this?

BrutusTrump wrote:

Claudio, no offense, but you're not even close to a grandmaster. I suck at chess. However, I do know enough to know that you are not a grandmaster.

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

BrutusTrump wrote:

Claudio, no offense, but you're not even close to a grandmaster. I suck at chess. However, I do know enough to know that you are not a grandmaster.

I never said I am a grandmaster, said he isn't capable of playing me, or any grandmasters, or im's

Game #1: https://lichess.org/h5MGi9N7/black#0

Game #2: https://lichess.org/5n7T5AXl/white#0

This is atomic chess and i barely know anything about how to do anuthing.