Karl v Nova0213 Chess

Karl von Krass wrote:

Game #1: https://lichess.org/h5MGi9N7/black#0

Game #2: https://lichess.org/5n7T5AXl/white#0

This is atomic chess and i barely know anything about how to do anuthing.

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

candy Crush.

whowh wrote:

Claudio von Panjim wrote:

candy Crush.

Ultimate strategy and tactics game right there.

Karl von Krass wrote:

I have the Stockfish10's Agreement, i am in an advantage.

https://lichess.org/iJYUxx90/black#30

This is a more accurate view of Claudio's playstyle.

(Also shows how i should not play)

I just can't believe how Karl did the last blunder

Karl von Krass wrote:

https://lichess.org/iJYUxx90/black#30

This is a more accurate view of Claudio's playstyle.

(Also shows how i should not play)

7 nge7 is a blunder because you gave up an important square for no reason . Also, you could counter with qf6 (as the ai suggested) It’s good because if claudio traded queens u get free g knight development if not he would “waste” a move in development . The game would be a bit better for u if he did or didnt trade queens as you have 2 knights and a queen developed (by playing ne7) or just playing d6 and being ready to develop ur light square bishop.

Edit : 7 nge7 is also a blunder because you would trap your queen defending that pawn after castling .

yes i had analysed the Game, I totally forgot my entire opening theory in Sicilian defence. Nge6 was a blunder i blame my insufficient knowledge on Sicilian theory on.

Yesterday's First Game: https://lichess.org/ZNhjQaRs/white#0

Yesterday's Second Game: https://lichess.org/ASxIyGCB/white#0

Yesterday's Third Game: https://lichess.org/SSGHowAs/black#0

Yesterday's Fourth Game: https://lichess.org/lyKKNaxB/white#0

1st: Did you forget how to checkmate?

2nd: Bad

3rd: Awful on both sides

4th: Not nice

All of the blunders are painful!

whowh wrote:

All of the blunders are painful!

K.Rokossovski wrote:

whowh wrote:

All of the blunders are painful!

Like trying to conquer Asia with militia supported by interceptors to take out the forts... which succeeded because the enemy was defending with aircraft convoys...

K.Rokossovski wrote:

whowh wrote:

Like trying to conquer Asia with militia supported by interceptors to take out the forts... which succeeded because the enemy was defending with aircraft convoys...

Yesterday's Game #1: https://lichess.org/1d1GvalV/white#0

yesterday's Game #2: https://lichess.org/YnU3xLq4/black#0

Yesterday's Game #3: https://lichess.org/hvMJYnlE/white#0

Game #1: i had Decided to imitate the moves Nova used to defeat me as white in Atomic chess, so i wanted to play e3, instead i played e4. She played e7, i played d3 a blunder, I tried to play Atomic chess as standard, she playef Qf6, a move i anticipated and blundered again with f3, I was trying to block my Variant ending without blocking my black square bishop. I know She tries to hang onto her Queen till the last moment in Atmoc chess as this piece can lead to check mate by itself and dosent actually need to be Capturing. I blundered by playing Bishop G4 to Threaten her Queen, she developed her knight as Advised by AI , i did a mistake of capturing her Queen, She Captured my pawn and boom goes my Queen. I then began developing my right flank to get a checkmate with my rook, i did the blunder of checking her King with my knight, and she did the blunder of moving her King, i Captured the adjacent pawn and won.

Game #2: this time i blundered by keeping my pieces to close to each other, when i shouldve done as AI advised me to develop My pieces instead moving my pawns 2x in a row and Allowing Nova to develop and get A checkmate on me.

Game #3: this game i used my queen to Destroy 3 Pieces of Nova, And i failed to capitalise on such a weak position, Instead of Trying to block her using Atomic chess i still used Standard chess tactics which caused me to lose.

Wow

me finding this and forgetting what it was.

me seeing it and regretting.

WHAT WAS I!?!?!?

Claudio NVKP wrote:

me finding this and forgetting what it was.

me seeing it and regretting.

WHAT WAS I!?!?!?

Karl von Krass wrote:

If there is any condolences, my chess became worse.

Claudio NVKP wrote:

Karl von Krass wrote:

If there is any condolences, my chess became worse.

Well, Claudio NVKP became good, but he forgot most of chess in the process.