Legalization of marijuana in the U.S

As I'm sure a lot of you already know legal marijuana is a trendy topic in the social media and news outlets of the U.S. More and more states are leaning towards some form of legalization rather that be medical or full blown recreational. More than half of the population of the U.S supports legalization of marijuana and it's not just the general public. Many political officials also voice their support for legalization. What are your views on marijuana? Are you a smoker? do you support or oppose legalization?

Personally I am a avid supporter of marijuana, I've smoked since my early teens and haven't stopped. The CEO of the company I work for acutally supports marijuana so drug tests aren't an issue for me thankfully. Anyways as I said I fully support legalization and I am active in the local community helping to spread the word and educate people on marijuana. I also help a local group in getting signatures and votes to send to the proper officials in a attempt to speed up the legalization process. Over here in Texas we're actually waiting on the newest bill to move to the next level.

Anyways I look forward to reading you're replys, Let's see them! :D :D :D :D

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

87 Replies

To legalize recreational marijuana would just be enforcing a double standard. I oppose it.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

To legalize recreational marijuana would just be enforcing a double standard. I oppose it.
How? I think we should legalize all recreational drugs.

Quasi-duck wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

To legalize recreational marijuana would just be enforcing a double standard. I oppose it.
How? I think we should legalize all recreational drugs.
Like meth and crack?

The US government funds anti-drug campaigns. To legalize a drug while you are trying to prevent drug use is a double standard.

Whether or not a certain recreational drug is bad for you, it is designed to take advantage of you. A few foolish mistakes can make somebody slave to an addiction, whether they know it or not. It's better to prevent people from being able to make those mistakes in the first place. I do realize there are cases where people take recreational drugs and do not become addicted, but they are meant to create addictions and take advantage of them, which is wrong. I believe that any substance that creates addictions should be strictly regulated, unless it is a vital necessity for life.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Like meth and crack?

Whether or not a certain recreational drug is bad for you, it is designed to take advantage of you. A few foolish mistakes can make somebody slave to an addiction, whether they know it or not. It's better to prevent people from being able to make those mistakes in the first place. I do realize there are cases where people take recreational drugs and do not become addicted, but they are meant to create addictions and take advantage of them, which is wrong. I believe that any substance that creates addictions should be strictly regulated, unless it is a vital necessity for life.

People already do it, so does it really matter?

Quasi-duck wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Like meth and crack?

Whether or not a certain recreational drug is bad for you, it is designed to take advantage of you. A few foolish mistakes can make somebody slave to an addiction, whether they know it or not. It's better to prevent people from being able to make those mistakes in the first place. I do realize there are cases where people take recreational drugs and do not become addicted, but they are meant to create addictions and take advantage of them, which is wrong. I believe that any substance that creates addictions should be strictly regulated, unless it is a vital necessity for life.

People already do it, so does it really matter?
This isn't to stop people who are currently doing it from doing it. They're going to do it no matter what. This is to stop more people from doing it.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

This isn't to stop people who are currently doing it from doing it. They're going to do it no matter what. This is to stop more people from doing it.
Why is that bad though? Free-choice and all that. Like with smoking.

Quasi-duck wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

This isn't to stop people who are currently doing it from doing it. They're going to do it no matter what. This is to stop more people from doing it.
Why is that bad though? Free-choice and all that. Like with smoking.
But it's not free choice once the addiction develops! Do you think it's right for somebody to be forced to buy the same drug his entire life because of a stupid decision he made when he was ~17? Legalizing marijuana would be legalizing an industry designed to take advantage of people.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

But it's not free choice once the addiction develops! Do you think it's right for somebody to be forced to buy the same drug his entire life because of a stupid decision he made when he was ~17? Legalizing marijuana would be legalizing an industry designed to take advantage of people.
They made the choice. They could also go to rehab.

I am a for legalising all recreational drugs. You stop the mafias from making money, the government gets money out of it, and people consume less. You'll say: "What? People consume less when they're legal? It makes no sense?" Well, it's true. When Nixon made marijuana (I think it was marijuana, anyway) illegal, marijuana consumption skyrocketed.

The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

I am a for legalising all recreational drugs. You stop the mafias from making money, the government gets money out of it, and people consume less. You'll say: "What? People consume less when they're legal? It makes no sense?" Well, it's true. When Nixon made marijuana (I think it was marijuana, anyway) illegal, marijuana consumption skyrocketed.
The damage is already done. I see your point of view, but not making it illegal in the first place would have helped. Making legal now would just increase consumption in the short (and possibly long) term.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

The damage is already done. I see your point of view, but not making it illegal in the first place would have helped. Making legal now would just increase consumption in the short (and possibly long) term.
No, no and no. Look at Holland.
The past is a foreign country.

Indeed, 'we' have less drug problems then in the states, becรกuse its (semi) legal.

Though I understand Hippos POV regarding addiction and all and agree somewhat, Id like to go deeper on that.

Should we ban alcohol then? Its just another (hard)drug, only difference its socially accepted. And I can tell you that compared to alcohol, weed is quite harmless from a medical perspective.

Should we ban coffee then? In some drugs you would be amazed how many ingredients are similar or even the same.

Should we ban chocolate? fat food? the list goes on and on. Where does it stop?

I admit some drugs should be banned, because in my view and knowledge they are pure evil to the body (Im looking at you heroine). Most other drugs are, just like with alcohol, fairly mild when used responsibly (for instance xtc, weed, hash, even coke).

Pablo22510 wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

The damage is already done. I see your point of view, but not making it illegal in the first place would have helped. Making legal now would just increase consumption in the short (and possibly long) term.
No, no and no. Look at Holland.
As I understand it certain drugs are banned even there.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

This topic should be consulted to the population of the United States in a referendum.


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Caesar wrote:

This topic should be consulted to the population of the United States in a referendum.
Including those who are addicted and won't be able to accurately decide what they need?

Some things are too important to be simply left to the people. I'm not sure if this is one of them yet.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Including those who are addicted and won't be able to accurately decide what they need?

Some things are too important to be simply left to the people. I'm not sure if this is one of them yet.

Drugs should not be allowed, but in the case of marijuana should be consulted.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Caesar wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Including those who are addicted and won't be able to accurately decide what they need?

Some things are too important to be simply left to the people. I'm not sure if this is one of them yet.

Drugs should not be allowed, but in the case of marijuana should be consulted.
Indeed. Maybe if marijuana is legal they should make tobacco illegal, since it is much more harmful?
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Indeed. Maybe if marijuana is legal they should make tobacco illegal, since it is much more harmful?
Tobacco companies give a portion of their benefit to the State, so the State benefits. In addition, people know that smoking kills.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Some things are too important to be simply left to the people. I'm not sure if this is one of them yet.
Then what about democracy man? The thing America is built on? It's only a bit of pot anyway.

America is not a democracy. America is a republic. There is a huge difference.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch